Friday, August 10, 2007

Women earn more, and why this is a good thing.

Welcome back!

According to the Outstanding gentlemen at

"The New York Times reports that in Los Angeles, Dallas, and New York City, the gender wage gap among people in their 20's favors women.

For women in Dallas it is as extreme as 120%!

'Young women in New York and several of the nation’s other largest cities who work full time have forged ahead of men in wages, according to an analysis of recent census data.

The shift has occurred in New York since 2000 and even earlier in Los Angeles, Dallas and a few other cities.'"

Be sure to read the article in full.

My take:

It's no secret that, in a Matriarchy, women will be favored over men in many aspects of life, and work is no exception.

Although big name politicians such as Sillary Clintion and the Aging feminasties at NOW decry the "wage gap", it is becoming increasingly clear that there is no such thing [a]. On top of this, we now have, courtesy of the New York Times, proof that women are being paid MORE than men, equality be damned.


Now that we know what we know, what do we do about it?

For one thing, we take the advice of the Immortal Mark Rudov and STOP TREATING THESE WOMEN WITH KID GLOVES.

Stop it, stop it, stop it, STOP IT!

The reality is that women are independent human beings who are responsible and accountable for their own decisions. They make their own choices, and therefore they bear the full responsibility for those choices.

You, as a man, have NO obligation to women beyond basic, common sense courtesy that is bestowed upon human beings worthy of such courtesy.

No paying for dates, no spending all your hard earned money on her, no "saving" her from the consequences of her own choices, good or bad.

Today's woman is deceived, so let her be deceived. Live your life to the fullest, and work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.

Once the truth of this is internalized, you will find freedom such as you have never known before.

It is not a man's burden to:

1) Protect or serve women

2) Work harder than women to maintain house, home, country or corporation. Woman has proved capable and willing to shoulder the burdens that men used to bear alone, so let her do her job.

3) Sacrifice himself, his legitimate needs and desires, for the sake of women. Men and women are human beings, created by God (Blessed be He) with equal worth. His needs, wants and desires are just as legitimate as any woman's, so long as they do not violate the Universal Law.

At this stage in history, women have decided to ignore their innate biological and spiritual strengths and weaknesses. They have chosen the way that is hard and arduous.

Therefore gentlemen, let them carry on with their work.

Focus on yourself, your needs, your hopes, your dreams, your loved ones, and your family, if that is your Karma. If a woman wants to form a family with you, let her choose freely, and let her be worthy of YOUR standards.

In essence, Women are able to stand on their own two feet, and they no longer need saving. The age of Chivalry is dead and buried, and may he eternally rest in peace!



Hawaiian Libertarian said...

Based on the ratio of women to men attending and graduating from college, we're gonna see more and more statistics of women surpassing men in the real world wages...while the femininsts will continue to disseminate the "Wage Gap" lie to sucker women and manginas into supporting their cause to further implement feminazi socialism.

Kumogakure said...


But everyone knows that women, by and large, are not interested in putting in the gawd awful hours it takes to run an economy the size of ours.

Not to mention, as I've posted about, and the NYT article states at the end, women want a man equal or higher in acheivement than themselves. This is their nature, and that will not change.

In the end, our unnatural way of doing things will fail.

It's our job as MRAs to try our best to warn those who can be saved.

LtRand said...

Actually, from a trend I've seen, I think we can start to expect a growing number of women, pressed my circumstances of reality, start to "marry down". Better for us, I believe.

Remember, how was it that women were able to push so hard publically in the 20's-70's? Because they didn't have jobs to contend with their activism. It is my view that the reverse will be true, we'll have a large community of men with nothing better to do, and that's when we'll be able to push the hardest to take back what is rightfully ours. But in the meantime, many will have no problem pushing a vacuum a few hours a day and then working on their favorite car project/video game, ect while she slaves away in a cube. We know how to be self content.

Kumogakure said...


Well said!

When there are large numbers of frustrated, angry men out there, expect change to come by revolution.

Circumstances similar to these helped to bring the traditional "warrior" class type into power, Japan and the Samurai at the end of the Heian period being a good approximate example.

All in all, things are looking up for the fellas.

You just can't keep a few good men down forever!

tba said...

the females will STILL find something to complain about. They will probably start bitching about how we men aren't taking seriously our responsibility to make MORE money than women--of course, with the irony being that they've been complaining FOREVER about how women only make X percentage to a man's dollar.

When this inconsistency is pointed out, they will summon the female trump card "It's my perogative to change my mind." I'm sorry, but if women can't stick to a point and understand the consequences I don't see why they should be permitted to vote.

Kumogakure said...


Women bitching endlessly about something???

Say it ain't so!

I agree that if women are not interested in being fully adult human beings, and accepting both the freedoms and the responsibilities that these entail, then they do not deserve to be full fledged citizens.

Like minors, they should be under the custody of a ward who will then look out of their best interests.