Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Kumogakure School... A Day in the Life Part I.



Welcome back to Kumogakure School.

Now that I've finished writing about the destruction of the Rights of Men at the hands of the Supreme Court of the United States, and about the 2000+ year old origins of feminism and communism, I desire to take some time and focus on the heart.

MGTOW is not some dimestore philosophy that someone concocted and posted online.

MGTOW is a way of life, and a lifechanging one at that, for those who have the courage to follow it.

I believe it is now appropriate for me to share with all of you what MGTOW has done for me, why I know that it is true, natural and harmonious with the Universal Law, and why Men in our present age should adopt it until the Rights of Men are once again acknowledged, respected, and encoded with the force of law and custom.

When Men begin living correctly, and begin applying the ideals of MGTOW in their own lives, Heaven grants them rewards beyond their wildest dreams.

Why?

Because, as Sun Tzu writes:

1. Sun Tzu said: The good fighters of old first put
themselves beyond the possibility of defeat, and then
waited for an opportunity of defeating the enemy.


2. To secure ourselves against defeat lies in our
own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy
is provided by the enemy himself
...


Removing yourself from the place of physical or spiritual danger is paramount. If someone invited you to a gunfight, and you only had a knife, would you show up?

Of course not. So it is with MGTOW.

By simply avoiding marriage, cohabitation, or unnecessary entanglements with women, the wise man sidesteps the power and tyranny of the Matriarchal state. The prudent man lives well, lives free, and waits until the time when a very large stake can be driven through the black heart of the feminist establishment.

As The Art of War tells us:

If he is secure at all points, be prepared for him.
If he is in superior strength, evade him
...


... If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to
irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant...


And so shall we do. Feminists, and other followers of doomed elitest movements, will remove themselves from existence, as their entire way of life violates the Universal Law.

The meek will truly inherit the earth, in time. So in the meantime, it is correct and prudent for men to adopt, and truly live, the MGTOW lifestyle.

Now, some of us will seek to marry.

For the record, I believe personally that marriage, monogamous or polygamous, is the best way of organizing a society.

On top of this, I think that it is better, speaking only for myself, to be married than to be single.

As an example, abstinence from sexual activity is the only sure way to be 100% safe from sexually transmitted disease. Although the man achieves an avoidance rate of 100%, complete avoidance of women can be harmful to some, for men differ in personality and temperament. Some men excel at celibacy, while others struggle mightily.

However, if a man has intercourse with a woman with the proper protection, he can greatly reduce the chance of infection, and at the same time, experience the pleasures of sexual union.

So then, while it is better in this day and age, thanks to feminism, to remain single and unattached, it is also possible, and in some cases, necessary, for a man to marry. The key is to take steps to mitigate the risks of entering into Holy Wedlock.

How can this be done?

Simple. We take Sun Tzu's advice and evade the feminized Western Woman entirely. Women who are infected with the feminist virus should be content to live out their days in solitude, since after all, a woman needs a man like "a fish needs a bicycle."

The man that has chosen to go his own way should respect the wishes of these women, and give them all the space they need. It would be rude, after all, to intrude upon the lives of such persons.

Let them go thier own way, as wasting precious energy upon them is pointless.

Since the vast majority of Western Women, who are infected with feminism, should be eliminated from consideration as possible wives and mothers, the enlightened man should seek greener pastures, as I have done.

Here are some links to get you started:

Russian Women
Russian Women for Western Men
Russian women speak
Outcast Superstar's Bachelor links page
Single Abroad
Japan Today Friends

In addition, a great way to meet single, foreign, and non feminist-infected women is to go to the nearest major University with a large foreign student population and volunteer to tutor English to them; or seek out foreign students to aid you with your own foreign language studies, if you are a foreign language learner. For example, I met my young wife (more about her later) while we were both attending University. I was originally her English tutor.

Trust me on this, your local College is the best kept secret in the quest to wine, dine, and marry the foreign woman of your dreams.

Why foreign women?

The answer is that, while there are always risks associated with marriage (especially if you are unfortunate enough to be living in the Matriarchy), a good friend of mine has proven, numerically, that marriage to an American (or Western) woman is a much greater risk than marriage to a woman from a culture outside of the West. Unfortunately, the original post that he refers to is lost, but most of it is still relevant to our discussion.

As my friend, who wishes to remain anonymous, wrote:



... This is an update on a previous post of mine:
http://forums.forbes.com/forbes/board/message?board.id=respond_marry_career_woman&message.id=8396

On that thread I made the following findings:

Married men, based on the assumptions made in my previous analysis, had a present value of wages at $686.074.54, not including cost of living, rent, car payments, etc.

Divorced men, based on the assumptions made in my previous analysis, had a present value of wages at $599,863.89.

These numbers resulted in a net loss of $86,210.65.

Then I says to myself, "Self? What would the portfolio risk of married vs divorced men be?"

So, I did some more number crunching.

Lets pretend that the $686,075 and the $599,864 numbers are possible investment outcomes.

And lets assume that the probabilities of marriage (.68) vs divorce (.32) are the probabilities of the investment choice outcome.

(For more detail on how I got .68 vs .32, please see:...(link)

And the numbers!

Expected return:

.68*686075= 466,531
.32*599864= 191,956

466,531+191,956= E(r) 658,487.

Variance:
.68(686,075-658,487^2) + .32(599,864-658,487^2)

Variance= 517,546,466 + 1,099,729,961 = 1,617,276,427.

Standard Dev = Square root of 1,617,276,427.

Standard Dev = $40,215.00

In dollars, the risk is $40,215.00.

As a percentage,

40215/(686075+599864) = 3% Standard Deviation.

Now then! Lets compare this to the risk of an American Man marrying a foreign woman.

Please note the following info... :

"According to data supplied by the U.S. Census Bureau, there were
2,395,000 marriages in the U.S. in the 12 months ending June, 1997 (and
1,154,000 divorces in the same period). The 4,000 to 6,000 marriages
involving international services represent, then, a tiny portion (.021
percent) of the women who marry U.S. men.

It is interesting to note that, based largely on data provided by the
agencies themselves (along with the Commission on Filipinos Overseas
report cited above), marriages arranged through these services would
appear to have a much lower divorce rate than the nation as a whole,
fully 80 percent of these marriages having lasted over the years for
which reports are available."

If this is the case, then our divorce probability with respect to a foreign woman is:

100 marriages less 80 successful marriages = 20 divorces.

Lets assume also that in these 20 divorces, women will initiate them at the same rate as American women. (Please see my initial post for more info on American women initiating divorces.)

.2 * .75 = .15 probability of divorce initiated by foreign wives.

So lets run the numbers for Foreign bride marriages!

Expected return:

.85*686075= 583164
.15*599864= 89980

583164 + 89980= E(r) 673144.

Variance:
.85(686,075-673144^2) + .15(599,864-673144^2)

Variance= 142,129,146 + 805,493,760 = 947,622,906.

Standard Dev = Square root of 947,622,906.

Standard Dev = $30783.00

In dollars, the risk is $30783.00.

As a percentage,

30783/(686075+599864) = 2.39% Standard Deviation.

So! As you can see, 3% - 2.39% = .61%

There is .61% more risk involved in marrying American women.

In light of these numbers, prudent financial managers would reject the American women portfolio, and choose the Foreign women portfolio.

And of course, those who don't marry at all have 0% Standard Deviation, or, No Risk. So the most prudent financial manager would choose not to marry at all, based on the current conditions.


Based on the data, we can see how foreign women are clearly superior to the vast majority of Western Women in terms of divorce risk avoidance.

But far more importantly, as I will explain next time, life with a non-feminized wife is a thousand times sweeter than many American men could dare to dream.

Kumo out.

2 comments:

Outcast Superstar said...

Wow! I'm going to have to add this to my collection. You can find this one in the MGTOW, Philosopy of Life, and Spirituality section of Happy Bachelors Forum

Kirigakure said...

Twas nothin!

Just keeping it real.