Sunday, November 29, 2009

Forecasting the End of Feminism

What's good?

Hope you all had a great Thanksgiving holiday!

Most readers know that I am optimistic about the future of Men's rights, and I believe that Political Feminism will be put out of its misery in the near future.

So let's talk about why I think the femmes are doomed.

Let's go!!

Radar: First they ignore you.

Not too long ago, a valued reader asked me why I was so optimistic about the future of Men's Rights. How could I be so confident, he wondered, that the power of political feminism is beginning to wane?

Firstly, I want to make it clear that political feminists still have a lot of clout, and that terrible injustices are happening to men and boys day in and day out. That is the reality. And we shouldn't forget that change happens very slowly; political feminism will do everything it can to prolong its unnatural life. Political feminism, in other words, is still armed and extremely dangerous.

In making statements about the future of feminism, I evaluate the ideology in the same way I evaluate the future prospects of an investment. I am looking for trends; small and subtle happenings that could lead to huge manifestations at some point in the future.

I forecast the ebb and flow of political feminist dominance using a variety of tools. One method I use, because I believe that feminism is an expression of psychic forces and human will, is the law of In and Yo (more commonly known as Yin and Yang).

Yin Yang Pictures, Images and Photos

As I mentioned in a previous post, I belong to a certain school of knowledge that prepares one for a wide range of combat and survival scenarios. When one is engaged in a military operation, forecasting the winds of fortune becomes a valuable skill.

One method to try to determine the outcome of an engagement in advance is the art of forecasting using In and Yo.

The law of In and Yo is fairly simple. The universe is cyclical in nature. All things ebb and flow. There is a waxing and a waning cycle that applies to all things.

The stock market rises and falls. Nations rise and fall. The moon waxes and wanes. People are born and then they die.

Nothing rests indefinitely, and everything is in constant motion.

Nothing in the natural world lasts forever, and, by extension, no ideology lasts forever either.

This is a simplified explanation of the law of In and Yo. With this knowledge, one can look for signs and cues and determine where we are at in any particular cycle, and one can also look for clues for expansion or contraction.

If one determines that feminism is in its ascending phase, then it is wise to get out of the way unless one wants to be crushed underfoot.

If one determines that feminism is entering into its descending phase, then one can help the process along by intense criticism and activism. In other words, we as Men's Rights Activists can help hasten its fall as the inescapable force of gravity takes hold of our favorite hate movement.

I believe there is enough evidence out there to suggest that political feminism is in decline.

One must also remember the 80/20 rule: 80 percent of outputs are caused by 20 percent of inputs. As Mr. Koch explains here, small, seemingly random events, such as, for example, a man in the UK writing a blog post critical of political feminism, could cause massive waves. Add a court decision here, a breakthrough study there, an economic crisis on top of that, and all of a sudden, the ship of political feminism could face the perfect storm that could potentially tear the vessel apart and run it aground.

There are Universal Laws that can be observed and applied to real life events and situations. If one is looking for clues as to the future trends affecting an event, a nation, or an ideology, one can determine whether or not it is waxing or waning. One can also determine if it is wise to confront the ideology directly, or attack it subtly. Sometimes it is better to keep oneself out of harms way, and other times, bold and direct opposition is the best course of action.

It should also be pointed out that movements and ideologies that violate Universal Laws will not long survive, as they go against the Universal grain. It takes massive amounts of energy and capital to overcome resistance and advance the unnatural social organization that political feminist public policy demands, and I believe it is beginning to run out of steam as various forms of drag begin to take hold. As more men (and women) free themselves from the Fematrix, the political, economic, and social will to continue on with our Matriarchal public policy will dissolve along with it.

And, as a wee bit of evidence to support my ramblings, allow me to share this recent Radar alert:

"First they ignore you, ..."

Two weeks ago,'s short-lived1 publication "Double X" published an article by Kathryn Joyce entitled "'Men's Rights' Groups Have Become Frighteningly Effective."2

This was not's finest hour. One thing this article could never be accused of is objective reporting.

On Nov. 5th, the very same day the Double X article appeared,'s Broadsheet published an article by Judy Berman entitled "'Men's rights' groups go mainstream"3 that adds no new information, and simply seems to be an effort to repeat the Double X article to Salon's readers...

... Mahatma Gandhi is reputed to have said: "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." The joint Slate/Salon attack pieces are a good indication that we're well past stage 1.

Congratulation to all RADAR supporters and allies for getting us this far. Let's keep it up!

Respect to RADAR, Glen Sacks, and countless other MRAs who are on the front lines in the battle against Political Feminism.

Let's take a moment to look at the Double X article:

"Men's Rights" Groups Have Become Frighteningly Effective

They’re changing custody rights and domestic violence laws.

By: Kathryn Joyce

At the end of October, National Domestic Violence Awareness Month, members of the men’s movement group RADAR (Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting [2]) gathered on the steps of Congress to lobby against what they say are the suppressed truths about domestic violence: that false allegations are rampant, that a feminist-run court system fraudulently separates innocent fathers from children, that battered women’s shelters are running a racket that funnels federal dollars to feminists, that domestic-violence laws give cover to cagey mail-order brides seeking Green Cards, and finally, that men are victims of an unrecognized epidemic of violence at the hands of abusive wives.

“It’s now reached the point,” reads a statement from RADAR, “that domestic violence laws represent the largest roll-back in Americans’ civil rights since the Jim Crow era!”

RADAR’s rhetoric may seem overblown, but lately the group and its many partners have been racking up very real accomplishments. In 2008, the organization claimed to have blocked passage of four federal domestic-violence bills, among them an expansion of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) to international scope and a grant to support lawyers in pro bono domestic-violence work. Members of this coalition have gotten themselves onto drafting committees for VAWA’s 2011 reauthorization. Local groups in West Virginia and California have also had important successes, criminalizing false claims of domestic violence in custody cases, and winning rulings that women-only shelters are discriminatory.

Ahh yes. You can feel the fear. The political feminists are worried, and for good reason. Their deceitful, harmful, and hurtful movement is going to be dumped like so much trash, and THEY KNOW IT.

The times, they are a changin'. And, in this next paragraph from Double X, we have a prime example of why feminism is toast... their entire movement is based upon lies, falsehoods, and propaganda:

... In this, critics like Australian sociologist Michael Flood say that men’s rights movements reflect the tactics of domestic abusers themselves, minimizing existing violence, calling it mutual, and discrediting victims. MRA groups downplay national abuse rates, just as abusers downplay their personal battery; they wage campaigns dismissing most allegations as false, as abusers claim partners are lying about being hit; and they depict the violence as mutual—part of an epidemic of wife-on-husband abuse—as individual batterers rationalize their behavior by saying that the violence was reciprocal. Additionally, MRA groups’ predictions of future violence by fed-up men wronged by the family-law system seem an obvious additional correlation, with the threat of violence seemingly intended to intimidate a community, like a fearful spouse, into compliance...

Good ol Michael Flood.

It turns out that I have already debunked his entire line of reasoning, and exposed his thesis as fundamentally flawed [a][b][c][d]. As usual, feminist rhetoric is trumped by correct reasoning and irrefutable evidence.

In any event... political feminism is a dead hag walking. It simply cannot stand up to any objective scrutiny, and its only a matter of time before it collapses upon itself like a ton of bricks. And believe you me... the feminists know this to be true.


The art of forecasting is an inexact science. My timing could be wrong, or something might happen to totally alter my prediction.

However, I see that the trends are lining up to sink the ship of political feminism. And, as they say in the world of finance, "the trend is your friend... until it ends."

So, until further notice, I will continue to assert that the best days of political feminism are behind it. Going forward, they are going to face ever mounting scrutiny and analysis.

Unfortunately for political feminism... an ideology based on deception and lies simply cannot take the heat. And I believe the day is coming when feminist public policy will be overthrown.

I, for one, can't wait for that day.


Wednesday, November 25, 2009

National Inflation Association presents: The Dollar Bubble.

The US Dollar/ US Treasury bubble...

The Final Frontier.

Check tha footage.

Time grows short. I highly recommend that you, Dear Reader, throw your financial survival plan into high gear...

End Transmission.

Sunday, November 22, 2009

Man tries to sell $1100 one ounce gold coin...

An interesting video.

Check it out:

There's a lot I could say about this video, but I'm going to keep it simple.

While some folks might be worried about if this coin was stolen or filled with Tungsten, the fact of the matter is that most people have no idea what real money is, or how economics or finance really works.

It's a sad state of affairs. A century or more ago, people knew what money was, and why having a precious metals standard was so important.

See the following:

Coin's Financial School

Coin at School in Finance

These two pamphlets were popular and widely read. Abhorrence to paper money was especially strong to these earlier generations.

And then... in the early twentieth century, the very nature of American government and society began to shift.

We saw the Federal Reserve come into being. We saw personal income taxes imposed upon the average citizen. We saw gold confiscation, wars, and inflation. The States were stripped of their Congressional representation, and the number of representatives that are directly accountable to the American public every two years were capped at a wholly inadequate proportion.

In short, the political and economic guarantors of the people's liberty were abolished in these pivotal years. America was transformed from Constitutional Republic, concerned with mostly domestic matters, to world beating empire hellbent on policing the world.

It's much easier to control 300 million people when they only have U.S. House representation of .00000145% (435/300,000,000).

It's much easier to control the populace when one can bypass the interests of 50 sovereign State governments and corrupt 100 members of the Senate directly.

It's a lot easier to control the people economically when the power to create and control valueless fiat money and credit rests in the hands of a very small number of Federal Reserve committee members.

It's certainly easy to control the masses when nine black robed justices have the sole power of defining what the Constitution means for 300 million people.

I imagine it would be extremely easy to dominate the serfs when there exists no office of the Tribune to actively defend the people from their government.

But most importantly, it is child's play to rule over the people when they have no working knowledge of finance, economics, politics or power.

The people, as a whole, have little to no understanding about these things. And, as I said in an earlier post, We the People, at this stage, have no concept of what true freedom is actually like, in any sphere, social, political, economic, or spiritual. Feminism is just a manifestation of a broader ignorance of reality.

When will the People finally understand what these things actually mean? And how long can the present corruption continue when the People finally awaken to the truth?

These are interesting questions. And I firmly believe that we are going to find out the answers in the very near future.


Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Congressional Reform is Way Overdue!


I wanted to bring two interesting websites to your attention:

Repeal the 17th Amendment


Both sites make the case for sorely needed Congressional reform. The fact of the matter is that our system is broken, and the Republic no longer exists.

Indeed, as the website Criminal correctly argues, America abandoned Constitutional Republicanism in favor of a socialist state way back in the day.

Throw in Keynesianism and Political Feminism into the mix, and the inescapable conclusion is that Americans have no idea what real freedom even feels like. Almost every right the people of this nation THINK they have has been stripped away, and the Legislative Branch has been especially effective at snuffing out the Natural Rights of the people (i.e. VAWA), nine times out of ten.

When you have a moment, please visit these sites and ponder what they have to say. Congress, in my opinion, is a failed body, and needs radical and mindbending reform if it is to function as the Legislative branch of a Constitutional Republic.

Give it some thought. Until next time...

Gyokko Out.

Sunday, November 8, 2009

This is Your Brain...

Greetings and welcome to another installment of Jeweled Tiger School!!

I am your host, Gyokko the Kidd.

Without further ado, lets get 'er done!


Here lately, I have emphasized the need to become more critical, more self aware, and more self determined. In other words, it is high time that Men Go Their Own Way, delete feminist and other self-defeating programming from their memory banks and society at large, and actually become the Masters of their own destiny.

As I have laid out in other postings, the process of creation and realization of key goals and objectives is out there. Certain enterprising individuals and groups are actively using these principles to win the game of life, and so must you.

Here's a little something about me:

Some of you might have already figured out that I belong to a certain organization. Every so often, I change the name of this blog to reflect certain branches of knowledge that this group teaches.

But for those who haven't noticed, click here to find out more about the Path that I follow. Please note that the content of this blog in no way represents the organization referenced above. My opinions are strictly my own.

Contained within the schools of knowledge that I have studied for over a decade is a principle known as Sanmitsu [1][2]. This is one of the ways in which certain Japanese warriors in dark costumes took care of business.

Thought energy, word energy, and physical energy (effort) come together in harmony, and the energies are amplified because the three waves of energy do not contradict one another. With self directed focus, commitment, and intention, the non physical is made manifest. This is one of the primary reasons why these certain individuals were widely feared in ancient Japan, and why their fame (and their art) has survived to modern times. Click here for more information.

Forgive me for digressing, but I am sharing all this with you, Dear Reader, for a number of important reasons.

1) By knowing my philosophical background, it will be easier for you to follow my thought process, and where I am coming from. You will also know why I emphasize certain principles more than others.

2) By understanding that the above mentioned principle of Sanmitsu has been tested over a vast time period and under extreme conditions, you can be confident that it is anything but "pie in the sky" wishful thinking. The principle works, and I would like to see enlightened men use it in their own lives, instead of constantly falling victim to it.

How do you think the feminists, socialists, and money men succeeded in undermining Western Civilization? Through Committed Thoughts, Well Chosen Words, and Countless Deeds over the course of centuries.

3) To encourage you to take control of your conscious and subconscious mental processes. As the Christians say, life is constant Spiritual Warfare. Those of us fighting the Fempire are really fighting a battle of the Spirit. We are constantly being programmed by family, friends, institutions, religions, corporations, and governments to feel, think, and behave in a certain way.

It would be one thing if the messages out there were empowering, enlightening, and beneficial for humankind. Unfortunately, the reality is that 80% of the programming available is wrong, flawed, and designed to control and subdue you. The instructions given are usually NOT in your best interests.

Feminism is a prime example of a philosophy built upon lies and deceit. It is an ideology that silences dissent and produces a host of negative outcomes, simply because 80% of the people buy into it. They Think feminism, Speak feminism, and Act according to feminist dogma.

Your duty, as an enlightened person who knows the facts about feminism, is to completely purge it from your mental processes, and to help others purge femi-fascism from their memory banks.

The various levels of mind are key to this whole struggle. Everything in this Universe literally depends on it. We have free will, and we must choose, very carefully, what we ultimately believe in because...

What we believe is what we will ultimately end up with.

See here for more info on the Biology of Belief.

Single Parents and the Brain.

From the Wall Street Journal:

This Is Your Brain Without Dad

... Conventional wisdom holds that two parents are better than one. Scientists are now finding that growing up without a father actually changes the way your brain develops.

German biologist Anna Katharina Braun and others are conducting research on animals that are typically raised by two parents, in the hopes of better understanding the impact on humans of being raised by a single parent. Dr. Braun's work focuses on degus, small rodents related to guinea pigs and chinchillas, because mother and father degus naturally raise their babies together.
[LAB] Matt Collins

When deprived of their father, the degu pups exhibit both short- and long-term changes in nerve-cell growth in different regions of the brain. Dr. Braun, director of the Institute of Biology at Otto von Guericke University in Magdeburg, and her colleagues are also looking at how these physical changes affect offspring behavior.

Their preliminary analysis indicates that fatherless degu pups exhibit more aggressive and impulsive behavior than pups raised by two parents...

... Dr. Braun and her colleagues found that in the two-parent families, the degu mothers and fathers cared for their pups in similar ways, including sleeping next to or crouching over them, licking and grooming them, and playing with them. The fathers even exhibited a "nursing-type" position.

When the mother was a single parent, the frequency of her interactions with her pups didn't change much, which means that those pups experienced significantly less touching and interaction than those with two parents.

The researchers then looked at the neurons—cells that send and receive messages between the brain and the body—of some pups at day 21, around the time they were weaned from their mothers, and others at day 90, which is considered adulthood for the species.

Neurons have branches, known as dendrites, that conduct electrical signals received from other nerve cells to the body, or trunk, of the neuron. The leaves of the dendrites are protrusions called dendritic spines that receive messages and serve as the contact between neurons.

Dr. Braun's group found that at 21 days, the fatherless animals had less dense dendritic spines compared to animals raised by both parents, though they "caught up" by day 90. However, the length of some types of dendrites was significantly shorter in some parts of the brain, even in adulthood, in fatherless animals.

"It just shows that parents are leaving footprints on the brain of their kids," says Dr. Braun, 54 years old.

The neuronal differences were observed in a part of the brain called the amygdala, which is related to emotional responses and fear, and the orbitofrontal cortex, or OFC, the brain's decision-making center...

... 'A Horse Without a Rider'

The balance between these two brain parts is critical to normal emotional and cognitive functioning, according to Dr. Braun. If the OFC isn't active, the amygdala "goes crazy, like a horse without a rider," she says. In the case of the fatherless pups, there were fewer dendritic spines in the OFC, while the dendrite trees in the amygdala grew more and longer branches.

A preliminary analysis of the degus' behavior showed that fatherless animals seemed to have a lack of impulse control, Dr. Braun says. And, when they played with siblings, they engaged in more play-fighting or aggressive behavior.

In a separate study in Dr. Braun's lab conducted by post-doctoral researcher Joerg Bock, degu pups were removed from their caregivers for one hour a day. Just this small amount of stress leads the pups to exhibit more hyperactive behaviors and less focused attention, compared to those who aren't separated, Dr. Braun says. They also exhibit changes in their brain.

The basic wiring between the brain regions in the degus is the same as in humans, and the nerve cells are identical in their function. "So on that level we can assume that what happens in the animal's brain when it's raised in an impoverished environment ... should be very similar to what happens in our children's brain," Dr. Braun says.

Other researchers, such as Xia Zhang, a senior scientist at the University of Ottawa Institute of Mental Health Research, and his colleagues in China, have observed different consequences using voles, mouselike rodents that also naturally co-parent. (Fewer than 10% of species raise their offspring with two parents.)

Voles deprived of their fathers—either from birth or later on in childhood—exhibited more anxious behaviors and were less social, spending less time engaging with stranger voles that were placed in their cage, according to a study by Dr. Zhang and his colleagues that was published in July in the journal Behavioral Processes.

Of course, the frontal cortex—where thinking and decision-making take place—is more complex in humans than it is in other animals. Thus, says Dr. Braun, it is important to be "really careful" about extrapolating the recent findings to human populations.

"The minute you get into stuff with extensive social and environmental components, the social differences between humans and animals are massive," says Simon Chapple, a senior economist in the social policy division of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the 30-country grouping of the world's largest economies...

It amazes me how people can contradict themselves. Earlier in the piece, we have this comment:

"The basic wiring between the brain regions in the degus is the same as in humans, and the nerve cells are identical in their function. "So on that level we can assume that what happens in the animal's brain when it's raised in an impoverished environment ... should be very similar to what happens in our children's brain," Dr. Braun says."

And later, we have peoples who are desperate to negate the damning implications of this research:

"Of course, the frontal cortex—where thinking and decision-making take place—is more complex in humans than it is in other animals. Thus, says Dr. Braun, it is important to be "really careful" about extrapolating the recent findings to human populations.

"The minute you get into stuff with extensive social and environmental components, the social differences between humans and animals are massive," says Simon Chapple, a senior economist in the social policy division of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the 30-country grouping of the world's largest economies."

Yes, caution should be warranted, and more extensive research should be carried out to see how fatherlessness affects brain development in human children.


Because research such as this greatly undercuts the legitimacy of Feminist theory and Feminist Public Policy, those who wish to continue said theories and policies are quick to backpedal with the "Humans are different" argument.

Nevermind the fact that if these findings had ZERO implications for humanity, the Journal would have ZERO interest in it and wouldn't even publish the story to begin with.

The "Humans are different" argument makes no sense in this case because we KNOW that the 80% (not an exact percentage, but a shorthand reference to the 80/20 principle) of children brought up in single parent families have all manner of negative outcomes in terms of wealth, health, crime, and relationships, just to name a few [1][2][3], just like the animals in the study.

Consider this article from Time Magazine:

Is There Hope for the American Marriage?

... the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported in May that births to unmarried women have reached an astonishing 39.7%. (See pictures of love in the animal kingdom.)

How much does this matter? More than words can say. There is no other single force causing as much measurable hardship and human misery in this country as the collapse of marriage. It hurts children, it reduces mothers' financial security, and it has landed with particular devastation on those who can bear it least: the nation's underclass.

The Marriage Gap

The poor and the middle class are very different in the ways they have forsaken marriage. The poor are doing it by uncoupling parenthood from marriage, and the financially secure are doing it by blasting apart their unions if the principals aren't having fun anymore.

The growing tendency of the poor to have children before marriage — the vast majority of unmarried women having babies are undereducated and have low incomes — is a catastrophic approach to life, as three Presidents in a row have tried to convince them. Bill Clinton's welfare-to-work program encouraged marriage, George W. Bush spent millions to promote marriage, and Barack Obama has spoken powerfully on the need for men to stay with their children: "We need fathers to step up, to realize that their job does not end at conception; that what makes you a man is not the ability to have a child but the courage to raise one." (See snapshots from a very special wedding.)

The reason for these appeals to lasting unions is simple: on every single significant outcome related to short-term well-being and long-term success, children from intact, two-parent families outperform those from single-parent households. Longevity, drug abuse, school performance and dropout rates, teen pregnancy, criminal behavior and incarceration — if you can measure it, a sociologist has; and in all cases, the kids living with both parents drastically outperform the others.

Few things hamper a child as much as not having a father at home. "As a feminist, I didn't want to believe it," says Maria Kefalas, a sociologist who studies marriage and family issues and co-authored a seminal book on low-income mothers called Promises I Can Keep: Why Poor Women Put Motherhood Before Marriage. "Women always tell me, 'I can be a mother and a father to a child,' but it's not true." Growing up without a father has a deep psychological effect on a child. "The mom may not need that man," Kefalas says, "but her children still do."

This turns out to be true across the economic spectrum. The groundbreaking research on the effects of divorce on children from middle- and upper-income households comes from a surprising source: a Princeton sociologist and single mother named Sara McLanahan, who decided to study the fates of these children with the tacit assumption that once you control for income, being part of a single-parent household does not adversely affect kids. The results — which she published in the 1994 book Growing Up with a Single Parent: What Hurts, What Helps — were surprising. "Children who grow up in a household with only one biological parent," she found, "are worse off, on average, than children who grow up in a household with both of their biological parents, regardless of the parents' race or educational background....

The outcomes for the experimental animals raised without a father were empirically negative. We know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the outcomes for human children raised without a father are overwhelmingly negative. We know that the animals in question and human beings share similar brain wiring.

Because we know all of this, is it reasonable then to say that we shouldn't use this study as another piece of evidence that, in the case of human children, fathers are needed, on a biological level, for them to achieve maximum levels of health, wealth, social stability, and happiness?

Would it be unreasonable to say that, because human brains and social structures are more complex and evolved, the impact of fatherlessness is more damaging and harmful for human children (and society) than for the lab rats (Degu) profiled in this study?

I want to address one more point in the WSJ article before I move on:

Risk of Delinquency

Still, the prevalence of single-parent households has researchers looking at possible consequences for children. An OECD report found that just 57% of children in the U.S. live with both parents, among the lowest percentages of the world's richest nations.

The report, which sparked some controversy when it was released in September, found that children in single-parent households have an increased risk of delinquency and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, or ADHD, as well as poorer scholastic performance.

The OECD also analyzed data from 122 separate studies and found that there was variability in the negative effects on children of living in a single-parent home; on average, the OECD found, the magnitude of the impact was relatively small. On a standardized intelligence test with a median score of 100 points, for example, a child in a single-parent family would be about 3.5 points worse off than a similar child in a two-parent family, according to Dr. Chapple, who co-wrote the report.

Dr. Braun's goal for future research is to figure out whether degu pups' brains can be rewired by introducing a substitute caregiver, such as a grandmother, or whether other social and emotional enrichment can help "repair" the fatherless pups, she says. Human children may be sent to day care, for instance, which can help them form stable friendships with their peers and other adults.

The bottom line, says Dr. Braun, is that parents need to fuel their children's brains with talk, touch and sensitive stimulation that involves give and take.

Parents, she says, "are the sculptors of their children's brains."

Note the following passage:

Dr. Braun's goal for future research is to figure out whether degu pups' brains can be rewired by introducing a substitute caregiver, such as a grandmother, or whether other social and emotional enrichment can help "repair" the fatherless pups, she says. Human children may be sent to day care, for instance, which can help them form stable friendships with their peers and other adults.

If, at some point in the future, research is conducted to find a way to help the children of single mothers (like me) and the children of divorce heal the ugly scars that our man hating culture and feminist public policy has imposed upon them, it would be absolute madness to think that someone in a lab could ultimately create a cure-all in a laboratory to help our children while at the same time keeping the aforementioned Misandric culture and feminist public policy that creates 80% of the problems in place!

It would save everyone a lot of time, energy, and resources if we abolished feminism right now. We have more than enough evidence to do so, and we have thousands of years of human social history that shows that stable marriage and family culture leads to long term positive outcomes.

The easiest and best way to prevent the negative outcomes of children raised in single parent homes is to STOP SEPARATING FATHERS FROM THEIR CHILDREN via involuntary divorce, domestic violence laws, and cultural bullying. KILL FEMINISM, AND YOU AUTOMATICALLY KILL THE PROBLEM.

Imagine, for a moment, that a coalition of Big Government types and ideologists who believed that right arms were inherently violent and dangerous passed a law that decreed that innocent children should have their potentially dangerous right arm removed when they reached the tender age of two years old. Imagine how society would be negatively impacted by the legion of children who are missing right arms.

Now finally, imagine the billions of dollars that would be spent in researching, testing, and manufacturing artificial arms to replace the arms that were removed, by force of law and bizarre custom, FOR NO GOOD REASON!

THIS, my friends, is where we are at today. Ideology, bad economic theory, and public policy are coming together to fuck up the lives of millions of innocent children (and fathers). And I am quite sure that some batshit insane feminists would have the audacity to suggest at some point that the solution to the problems that THEY caused initially is to do more "research" in order to repair the damage that was unnecessarily caused in the first place (notice the similarity of this kind of thinking to our totally ass backwards economic policy).

If anything, the ultimate goal of society should be to find out if human children are neurologically impacted (which I'm sure they are) by the removal of their fathers. And, if the research confirms it, add the study to the mountain of reasons why feminist public policy should be completely abolished forever and ever.

Before we move on, this story is interesting to me because it is another piece of evidence that points to an obvious conclusion: Fathers are needed in the lives of their children, and this is a biological and a spiritual need. All the daycare and all the government welfare kool-aid in this world will not change this important fact.

Where mind and matter meet.

And for my next act, I want to merge the importance of critical and careful programming of the conscious and subconscious mind with the implications that this Wall Street Journal story raises.

I would like to briefly quote from Dr. Bruce Lipton's fascinating book, the Biology of Belief:

... Frontier science is confirming what mothers and enlightened fathers have known forever, that parents do matter, despite best selling books that try to convince us otherwise. To quote Dr. Thomas Verny, a pioneer in the field of prenatal and perinatal psychiatry: "Findings in the peer-reviewed literature over the course of decades establish, beyond any doubt, that parents have overwhelming influence on the mental and physical attributes of the children they raise." (Verny and Kelly 1981) (p. 125).

And that influence starts, says Verny, not after children are born, but BEFORE (author's emphasis) children are born (p. 126).

... experimental psychologists and neuroscientists are demolishing the myth that that infants cannot remember--or for that matter learn--and along with it the notion that parents are simply spectators in the unfolding of their children's lives. The fetal and infant nervous system has vast sensory and learning capabilities and a kind of memory that neuroscientists call implicit memory... "the quality of life in the womb, our temporary home before we were born, programs our susceptibility to coronary artery disease, stroke, diabetes, obesity, and a multitude of other conditions in later life," writes Dr. Peter W Nathanielsz in Life in the Womb, Origins of Health and Disease (p. 126)."

... parents can improve the prenatal environment. In doing so they act as genetic engineers for their children... influences continue after the child is born because parents continue to influence their child's environment. In particular, fascinating new research is emphasizing the importance of good parenting in the development in the brain. "For the growing brain of a young child, the social world supplies the most important experiences influencing the expression of genes, which determines how neurons connect to one another in creating the neuronal pathways which give rise to mental activity," writes Dr. Daniel J Siegal in The Developing Mind (p. 127-128).

The Author goes on to explain the brain wave activity in children, the conscious and subconscious mind and how it is programmed, and a ton of other news you can really use.

Sounds a lot like the Wall Street Journal piece... doesn't it?? Young brain development, environmental factors, parental influence trumping supposedly predetermined genetic predestination...

Ladies and gents, I would highly recommend that you pick up this book. Don't walk... RUN and get a copy today. Your mind will never be the same again. Be sure to read it carefully, and reflect on the full implications of the information presented there.

How much damage has our policies of abortion on demand, involuntary divorce, and single mother subsidization really inflicted upon our nation? Can the full criminality of this entire Matriarchal regime be fully calculated?

Read the book, and you be the judge.



Feminism is flat out and totally wrong. It is based on lies. It is based on false premises. The errors of feminism are infinite and plainly obvious. There is no excuse for any thinking individual to buy into or support this hate filled ideology.

The feminist lie of "children don't no need fathers" has been debunked all to hell. The truth is out there. There is no need to give feminism any credibility or credence in your conscious or your subconscious mind. De-program thyself! Banish feminist theory from your heart and mind forever.

And don't forget... you have a duty to yourself, your children, and your fellow man (and woman) to slay feminist ideology and public policy wherever you find it.

Your babies are being brainwashed by flawed, false, and outdated feminist theory. Men are going to jail everyday due to flawed and wrongheaded feminist public policy.

IT IS YOUR DUTY to oppose feminism by any means you can, within the boundaries of legality and common sense.

And finally, understand that YOU have tremendous power over yourself and those who are in your care. Know, Understand, and Obey the Universal Law.

You have the authority, the ability, the power, and the responsibility to elevate yourself and those you love to tha next level. You, Dear Reader, can and must work with the Father to make things happen.

Feminists can't hold you down forever. Governments who are out of control will be brought to heel eventually. Economic mismanagement won't last forever.

Understand the power you have to make the best out your personal circumstances. I can point out principles that have worked for me; but at the end of the day, your Thoughts, your Words, and your Deeds are the only ones that matter in your world and those who live in it. Choose correctly, and with great care.

Kind Regards,


Monday, November 2, 2009

State of the black American Family.


Long time readers know that I am a man whose ancestors hail from Mozambique, Ireland, Germany, Israel, and parts unknown.

On U.S. Census forms, I identify myself as African American.

I've been writing for quite some time that the Afro-American family is dead, and that political feminism and government conspired to kill it. This is a subject that is near and dear to my heart.

Today, Dear Readers, I want to revisit this topic and chronicle the sad and bizarre situation that is black love, sex, marriage, and gender relations in 2009 America. On the bright side, some light bulbs are coming on. On the not-so-bright side, massive numbers of folks are suffering from tragically flawed political feminist public policy.

My gameplan is to share some stories of interest, and comment upon them as I see fit.

Is deal?

Ok, here we go!

Black Women still don't get it.


Marriage eludes high-achieving black women
Many remain single and childless, according to new research

By Brian Alexander contributor
updated 8:31 a.m. ET, Thurs., Aug 13, 2009

Michelle Obama may have become an archetypal African-American female success story — law career, strong marriage, happy children — but the reality is often very different for other highly educated black women.

They face a series of challenges in navigating education, career, marriage and child-bearing, dilemmas that often leave them single and childless even when they’d prefer marriage and family, according to a research study recently presented at the American Sociological Society’s annual meeting in San Francisco.

Yale researchers Natalie Nitsche and Hannah Brueckner argued that “marriage chances for highly educated black women have declined over time relative to white women.” Women of both races with postgraduate educations “face particularly hard choices between career and motherhood,” they said, “but especially in the absence of a reliable partner...”

The plight of the (more often than not) ball busting African American career woman is both interesting and tragic on a number of levels.

For all of my natural life (30+ years), the guiding philosophy of (black and white) elites can be boiled down to: 'Little black girls are good and deserve all of our time, energy and resources, and little black boys are bad and deserved to be either stoned to death or locked up.'

Now that wasn't complicated, was it?

Black girls are the focus of numerous, well financed organizations and government bodies. Feminist groups, educational groups, civil rights groups, corporate entities, and others I can't think of at the moment have devoted an obscene amount of time and money to educate and elevate black women and girls to positions of power and influence in government, business, media, and academia.

Women (black and white) have benefited vastly from this concentrated effort. They have been less affected during our current economic downturn, they earn higher wages than men in certain major metropolitan areas, they are the majority of the nation's college and university students, and most importantly, the full force of feminist public policy is backing their every move.

In short, women can usually do no wrong.

By any objective measure, the efforts to elevate women over men have been quite effective. In the black community in particular, women rule in all the ways that matter.

With the exception of the money men and their manservants at the top of the food chain, America in general truly is a woman's nation.

I'm not saying this to be negative or self defeating, but only to acknowledge a hard fact. As I've been saying for quite a while: Women have all of the rights, privileges and prerogatives; while men only have responsibilities and liabilities.

Unfortunately for our lonely career woman, and for the nation in particular, the Matriarchal system is vastly inferior, less stable, and less productive than a society where male headship and the manly spirit of Thumos is the driving factor.

Proof of this can be found by comparing the fates of nations where the rights of men are respected and upheld, and the nations in which Matriarchy was public policy. Throughout history, the "Patriarchal" nations were more successful and productive because, sad to say, men value principles such as discipline, honor, and justice more than women do, and actually try to uphold them in a fair and impartial manner. Sometimes the efforts are successful, other times, not. But at least they try.

Furthermore, men and women are NOT the same. As a matter of fact, women and women are not the same. See here for posts dealing with the sliding scale of manliness and femininity [a][b].

Because of the absolute fact that men and women are different, and that women will seek certain kinds of men based on each individual's conscious and unconscious desires and needs, social conditioning be damned, many of today's successful black women, having drunk the feminist kool-aid, are finding that their degrees are hollow, their financial statements provide little warmth, and their lives are filled with loneliness.

The problem here is twofold:

1) The majority of black women are not brought up to attract, keep, or please a man who is in touch with his manliness or sense of honor. These women ignore the "good black men" and go for the "bad boy thug" who speaks to their deepest needs and desires. They have no inkling of what an honorable man is, or they simply don't see him because he doesn't have an MBA or doesn't drive a Mercedes Benz. In short, many of these women have contradictory programming and expectations, and are short circuited in their love lives as a result.

2) Our society is not producing the "evolved man" that the newly elevated black woman has been programmed to accept. The ideal black man that is on a higher level in terms of education, accomplishment, or success is a fairly rare commodity that is rapidly taken off the market by a huge number of hungry female competitors of all races and nations.

(I speak from personal experience; my Japanese wife aggressively pursued ME from the beginning of our relationship, and used all of her considerable womanly arts to seal the deal.)

Since this kind of sophisticated man is so highly desired by high powered black female career women, and the supply of such men is artificially limited by a misandric culture and wrongheaded public policy, shortages of "eligible men" are commonplace. One cannot artificially elevate one segment of the population, leave the other behind, and expect everything to turn out fine... unless you are a feminist that is.

Getting back to the article:

... And there’s the rub. As noted in a recent Sexploration column, contrary to old media reports, most educated, professional women who want to marry can and do marry. But the picture is less bright for high-achieving black women because “marriage markets” for them have deteriorated to the point that many remain unmarried, the researchers found. Since these women also feel pressured not to become single mothers, they often go childless as well, the researchers found...

Well, I'm glad to hear that at least some of these women choose not to become the scourge of American society, i.e. single mothers.

... In the study, Nitsche and Brueckner used data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey of 50,000 households dating back to the 1970s to tease out data points on race, gender, education, marriage and fertility.

Beyond the personal interests of individual women, the trend is significant because "in terms of American society, this is one additional obstacle” to the broadening of the black middle class, Brueckner said. Fewer highly educated black people having children means that they cannot pass on those advantages and knowledge.

This defeats the goal of affirmative action, argue some demographers. The idea behind assuring that blacks had access to higher education and graduate school was that after a generation or so, African-Americans would reach a kind of achievement parity after generations of suffering educational and career restriction. But if black women, who comprise 71 percent of black graduate students, according to the census data, do not have children, the rate of achievement reaches a kind of familial dead end.

The massive explosion of Welfare and political feminist public policy has already killed the black family. It. Is. Already. Dead. The grossly unbalanced effort to elevate black women, and ignore, in all areas of life, the issues impacting black men, is just another nail in the coffin.

Declining marriage chances

One big reason why these women remained childless is, as one might expect, that they go unmarried, experts say. Among highly educated women of both races, about 22 percent between the ages of 20 and 45 were single in the 1970s. But then that number diverged. It has remained the same for white women, but now 38 percent of black women have never been married.

“Their marriage chances have declined,” Brueckner explained. “This may sound trivial but one reason is that they outnumber men in this education group.” The disparity in education is important because Americans have a strong tendency to marry those with equal levels of education, a trend that has only grown stronger since World War II. “So since there are fewer men with the same education,” Brueckner continued, “you either have to find another group you can marry or you are out of luck. You have nowhere to go.”

Highly educated black men tend to “outmarry” (marry outside race, religion or ethnicity) at a higher rate than black women, researchers say. Think of Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates or Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Both married white women.

Black women are either much more reluctant to marry outside their race, or do not have the opportunity to do so. The answer is both, Clarke said.

Actually, most women would like a man who has superior credentials to their own. Most women are seeking a man who is slightly, moderately, or completely superior with respect to status, intelligence, earning power, and so forth. But any woman who lives in a country that produces men with less status, less education, or less earning power is bound to be disappointed once she reaches a certain level.

Again, by stacking the deck against men in all of the areas of life that matter, it is inevitable that the offending society functions at a lower level in multiple areas than it otherwise could have.

The article also references black men who marry outside of their race. As a highly intelligent black man, my philosophy is that an awake and intelligent man should NEVER compromise and marry a woman who doesn't know what the meaning of the word wife is.

If a woman cannot cook, clean, have a pleasant and supportive attitude, be kind to my children, and have some intelligence and positive life experiences to bring to the table... then she is not wife material and shouldn't be touched with a ten foot pole.

And unfortunately, most black women fall into this category. Not only do most have ZERO wifely skills, they are UNWILLING to develop them. And, in this global marketplace of love we find ourselves in, black American women simply cannot compete with delectable Brazilian women, sultry African women, sweet Asian women, feminine European women, or women of any nationality who are in full possession of their womanly charms and aren't afraid to use them. The global competition that black women face today is unreal, and, from my personal experience at least, women worldwide are very kind to black men.

At the end of the day, black women need to step up. If they want to find male companionship, I would urge them to stop looking outside, and look inward. Because, sisters, you have a lot of internal work to do.

Time to take out the Political Feminist garbage.

Fatherless Youth at the Brink

From the Toledo Journal:

Black Youth Face Growing Threat of Violence from Peers

By: Kristin Gray

Special to the NNPA from the Afro-American Newspapers

Originally posted 10/8/2009

WASHINGTON (NNPA) - For soft-spoken honors student Derrion Albert, death came at the hands and feet of a savage mob of his peers.

Albert, 16, of Chicago, was brutally beaten as he walked home from school Sept. 26. The culprits, four angry Black boys between the ages of 16 and 19, were videotaped bludgeoning Albert with a railroad tie plank and pummeling him in an unprovoked fit of rage.

The church-going teen’s death has brought to light the ongoing war Black youth wage against one another. Even President Obama, whose former Chicago residence is less than an hour away from the site of Albert’s death, has called the grainy, two-minute cell phone video “chilling.”

Obama will deploy Attorney General Eric Holder and Education Secretary Arne Duncan, the former head of Chicago schools, to the Windy City next week to “talk about the issues of school violence and youth violence,” White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said Oct.1...

To paraphrase Ronald Reagan, government cannot solve this problem, because it IS the problem. Governments have all manner of laws that discourage marriage, discourage family formation, and enable women to separate fathers from their children anytime they choose. Under legal and social conditions such as these, is there any wonder that the children of single mothers (like me) and broken families living in economic depression are literally beating each other to death?

Feminist public policy and Fiat economic policy combine to devastate young black men. And yet, only a few can make the connection. Government will do nothing to solve this problem unless it repeals or reforms family and domestic violence laws, re-institutes the gold standard, eliminates individual income and payroll taxes, and eliminates the central bank.... but I wouldn't recommend holding your breath while waiting for these reforms to get done.

Back to the piece:

... While youth violence has decreased nationally since 2004, Black children represent an overwhelming majority of crime victims and crime perpetrators.

According to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) statistics released in 2008, the homicide rate among Black males ages 10 to 24 is more than double that of Hispanic and White males in the same age group, even though African-Americans are a minority population in the U.S.

The CDC also found that nearly 36 percent of students in grades 9 through 12 had been in physical fights in 2007, while 16.3 percent of male students surveyed said they had fought on school property. But statistics do little to explain why so many Black children are robbing each other of the opportunity to become adults. Some believe the breakdown of the Black family has created a generation of children lacking support at home and positive images of Black men. Others point to social Web sites like Facebook and YouTube as the new hangout for schoolyard bullies and promoters of teen-on-teen violence...

... nationwide, the Black family seems to be imploding.

Grandmothers are often forced to care for the offspring of their drug-addicted children and a sputtering economy has caused parents to spend longer hours on the job.

Even more troubling are the numbers of Black men and women committing to marriage. According to the 2008 Census Bureau Current Population Report, only 43 percent of Black women were married, compared to 79 percent of Asian women and 69 percent of White women. In the media, African-American fathers have been notoriously depicted as non-existent or transient parts of their children’s lives.

Both Conyers Johnese and Ogunronke point to firm parenting as the primary tool to prevent violence in young Black America.

“First and foremost, our children [and] youth need love, support and caring, as simple as that. If this is not in the household it indicates that these parents need assistance and help themselves,” Ogunronke said. “For parents that are struggling to do the right thing in raising their children, they should seek out resources within and outside of their community. They must also be willing to invest time within their hectic schedule to work with their children and those resources that are available and providing such services...”

As I wrote previously, the law is the lowest level of virtue. While I wholeheartedly agree that children need love, support, resources, and guidance, it also must be noted that all of these things are extremely difficult to provide to the youth if the entire system is set up to generate negative, wealth draining, and harmful outcomes.

Law and public policy is the foundation of a stable and productive society. If a country allows false accusations of rape, false accusations of domestic violence, unilateral divorce, wage slavery via child support obligations, and terrible economic and political policies in other areas, all of these seemingly abstract and separate conditions combine to sap the strength and the will from otherwise well intending individuals. If there is no justice coming from the law courts, the legislators and the executives, there will be no justice in the country. If people support and buy into harmful ideologies such as political feminism, then chaos, poverty, and injustice shall reign. It's a vicious cycle that generates wave after wave of destructive negative feedback loops.

No one should be surprised anymore by any horrendous outcomes our system brings into being.

I'll tell you one thing: unless and until we repeal all of the laws, and deep-six all of the anti-male attitudes that turn men off from marriage, family, and community life, you are going to see more shocking incidents than this.

Instead of trying to reform the political feminist system, they are going to declare open season and destroy as much of the Matriarchy as they can, however they can. How much you wanna bet that the wrong lessons will be learned from this and other harrowing incidents where a caring father and a stable family would have made all the difference?

How much you wanna bet that the violence and reprisals will only get worse, and not better?


Political feminism is a dying movement. The young people know one of the two main reasons why their lives are less than ideal. Fiat money and misguided economic policy is the more hidden source of their problems. The problems that fatherlessness, brought to us by our political feminist friends, creates is more visible, and the children know it.

From the Washington Post:

Making the Grade Isn't About Race. It's About Parents.

"Why don't you guys study like the kids from Africa?"

In a moment of exasperation last spring, I asked that question to a virtually all-black class of 12th-graders who had done horribly on a test I had just given. A kid who seldom came to class -- and was constantly distracting other students when he did -- shot back: "It's because they have fathers who kick their butts and make them study."

Another student angrily challenged me: "You ask the class, just ask how many of us have our fathers living with us." When I did, not one hand went up.

I was stunned. These were good kids; I had grown attached to them over the school year. It hit me that these students, at T.C. Williams High School in Alexandria, understood what I knew too well: The lack of a father in their lives had undermined their education. The young man who spoke up knew that with a father in his house he probably wouldn't be ending 12 years of school in the bottom 10 percent of his class with a D average. His classmate, normally a sweet young woman with a great sense of humor, must have long harbored resentment at her father's absence to speak out as she did. Both had hit upon an essential difference between the kids who make it in school and those who don't: parents.

More and more people, of all races, are coming to understand that political feminism is their mortal enemy. They will also know that the twin evils of feminist public policy and fiat money, which causes all manner of economic chaos, flows from government, and persons acting in co-operation with government.

When the full enormity of these truths are grasped, maybe they will become Classical Liberals like me, and demand that the wild beast that is government be confined to its chains.

But until the truth is firmly and concretely understood, the masses might very well continue to blame men, push for more laws, and beef up the failed policies and ideas that have brought us to our current sorry state. We as enlightened men must understand this and stand ready to avoid the inevitable fallout, and be ready to educate the people during the aftermath.

In my case, I will continue to monitor the black American family. Without this venerable institution, my people will continue to struggle, suffer, and die unfulfilled. I will continue to make the case against political feminism until the day comes when it is broadly and publicly rejected.

I still firmly believe that day is coming. There will come a time when the pain that political feminism causes will be to great to be ignored. There will come a time when the rights of men will be respected and upheld by law and by custom, when all other options have failed.

And when that time comes, the black American family will live again. It will reconstitute itself; more rapidly than many might think.