This is Your Brain...

Greetings and welcome to another installment of Jeweled Tiger School!!

I am your host, Gyokko the Kidd.

Without further ado, lets get 'er done!




Brainwork.





Here lately, I have emphasized the need to become more critical, more self aware, and more self determined. In other words, it is high time that Men Go Their Own Way, delete feminist and other self-defeating programming from their memory banks and society at large, and actually become the Masters of their own destiny.

As I have laid out in other postings, the process of creation and realization of key goals and objectives is out there. Certain enterprising individuals and groups are actively using these principles to win the game of life, and so must you.

Here's a little something about me:

Some of you might have already figured out that I belong to a certain organization. Every so often, I change the name of this blog to reflect certain branches of knowledge that this group teaches.

But for those who haven't noticed, click here to find out more about the Path that I follow. Please note that the content of this blog in no way represents the organization referenced above. My opinions are strictly my own.

Contained within the schools of knowledge that I have studied for over a decade is a principle known as Sanmitsu [1][2]. This is one of the ways in which certain Japanese warriors in dark costumes took care of business.

Thought energy, word energy, and physical energy (effort) come together in harmony, and the energies are amplified because the three waves of energy do not contradict one another. With self directed focus, commitment, and intention, the non physical is made manifest. This is one of the primary reasons why these certain individuals were widely feared in ancient Japan, and why their fame (and their art) has survived to modern times. Click here for more information.

Forgive me for digressing, but I am sharing all this with you, Dear Reader, for a number of important reasons.

1) By knowing my philosophical background, it will be easier for you to follow my thought process, and where I am coming from. You will also know why I emphasize certain principles more than others.

2) By understanding that the above mentioned principle of Sanmitsu has been tested over a vast time period and under extreme conditions, you can be confident that it is anything but "pie in the sky" wishful thinking. The principle works, and I would like to see enlightened men use it in their own lives, instead of constantly falling victim to it.

How do you think the feminists, socialists, and money men succeeded in undermining Western Civilization? Through Committed Thoughts, Well Chosen Words, and Countless Deeds over the course of centuries.

3) To encourage you to take control of your conscious and subconscious mental processes. As the Christians say, life is constant Spiritual Warfare. Those of us fighting the Fempire are really fighting a battle of the Spirit. We are constantly being programmed by family, friends, institutions, religions, corporations, and governments to feel, think, and behave in a certain way.

It would be one thing if the messages out there were empowering, enlightening, and beneficial for humankind. Unfortunately, the reality is that 80% of the programming available is wrong, flawed, and designed to control and subdue you. The instructions given are usually NOT in your best interests.

Feminism is a prime example of a philosophy built upon lies and deceit. It is an ideology that silences dissent and produces a host of negative outcomes, simply because 80% of the people buy into it. They Think feminism, Speak feminism, and Act according to feminist dogma.

Your duty, as an enlightened person who knows the facts about feminism, is to completely purge it from your mental processes, and to help others purge femi-fascism from their memory banks.

The various levels of mind are key to this whole struggle. Everything in this Universe literally depends on it. We have free will, and we must choose, very carefully, what we ultimately believe in because...

What we believe is what we will ultimately end up with.

See here for more info on the Biology of Belief.





Single Parents and the Brain.

From the Wall Street Journal:


This Is Your Brain Without Dad


... Conventional wisdom holds that two parents are better than one. Scientists are now finding that growing up without a father actually changes the way your brain develops.

German biologist Anna Katharina Braun and others are conducting research on animals that are typically raised by two parents, in the hopes of better understanding the impact on humans of being raised by a single parent. Dr. Braun's work focuses on degus, small rodents related to guinea pigs and chinchillas, because mother and father degus naturally raise their babies together.
[LAB] Matt Collins

When deprived of their father, the degu pups exhibit both short- and long-term changes in nerve-cell growth in different regions of the brain. Dr. Braun, director of the Institute of Biology at Otto von Guericke University in Magdeburg, and her colleagues are also looking at how these physical changes affect offspring behavior.

Their preliminary analysis indicates that fatherless degu pups exhibit more aggressive and impulsive behavior than pups raised by two parents...

... Dr. Braun and her colleagues found that in the two-parent families, the degu mothers and fathers cared for their pups in similar ways, including sleeping next to or crouching over them, licking and grooming them, and playing with them. The fathers even exhibited a "nursing-type" position.

When the mother was a single parent, the frequency of her interactions with her pups didn't change much, which means that those pups experienced significantly less touching and interaction than those with two parents.

The researchers then looked at the neurons—cells that send and receive messages between the brain and the body—of some pups at day 21, around the time they were weaned from their mothers, and others at day 90, which is considered adulthood for the species.

Neurons have branches, known as dendrites, that conduct electrical signals received from other nerve cells to the body, or trunk, of the neuron. The leaves of the dendrites are protrusions called dendritic spines that receive messages and serve as the contact between neurons.

Dr. Braun's group found that at 21 days, the fatherless animals had less dense dendritic spines compared to animals raised by both parents, though they "caught up" by day 90. However, the length of some types of dendrites was significantly shorter in some parts of the brain, even in adulthood, in fatherless animals.

"It just shows that parents are leaving footprints on the brain of their kids," says Dr. Braun, 54 years old.

The neuronal differences were observed in a part of the brain called the amygdala, which is related to emotional responses and fear, and the orbitofrontal cortex, or OFC, the brain's decision-making center...

... 'A Horse Without a Rider'

The balance between these two brain parts is critical to normal emotional and cognitive functioning, according to Dr. Braun. If the OFC isn't active, the amygdala "goes crazy, like a horse without a rider," she says. In the case of the fatherless pups, there were fewer dendritic spines in the OFC, while the dendrite trees in the amygdala grew more and longer branches.

A preliminary analysis of the degus' behavior showed that fatherless animals seemed to have a lack of impulse control, Dr. Braun says. And, when they played with siblings, they engaged in more play-fighting or aggressive behavior.

In a separate study in Dr. Braun's lab conducted by post-doctoral researcher Joerg Bock, degu pups were removed from their caregivers for one hour a day. Just this small amount of stress leads the pups to exhibit more hyperactive behaviors and less focused attention, compared to those who aren't separated, Dr. Braun says. They also exhibit changes in their brain.

The basic wiring between the brain regions in the degus is the same as in humans, and the nerve cells are identical in their function. "So on that level we can assume that what happens in the animal's brain when it's raised in an impoverished environment ... should be very similar to what happens in our children's brain," Dr. Braun says.

Other researchers, such as Xia Zhang, a senior scientist at the University of Ottawa Institute of Mental Health Research, and his colleagues in China, have observed different consequences using voles, mouselike rodents that also naturally co-parent. (Fewer than 10% of species raise their offspring with two parents.)

Voles deprived of their fathers—either from birth or later on in childhood—exhibited more anxious behaviors and were less social, spending less time engaging with stranger voles that were placed in their cage, according to a study by Dr. Zhang and his colleagues that was published in July in the journal Behavioral Processes.

Of course, the frontal cortex—where thinking and decision-making take place—is more complex in humans than it is in other animals. Thus, says Dr. Braun, it is important to be "really careful" about extrapolating the recent findings to human populations.

"The minute you get into stuff with extensive social and environmental components, the social differences between humans and animals are massive," says Simon Chapple, a senior economist in the social policy division of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the 30-country grouping of the world's largest economies...

It amazes me how people can contradict themselves. Earlier in the piece, we have this comment:

"The basic wiring between the brain regions in the degus is the same as in humans, and the nerve cells are identical in their function. "So on that level we can assume that what happens in the animal's brain when it's raised in an impoverished environment ... should be very similar to what happens in our children's brain," Dr. Braun says."

And later, we have peoples who are desperate to negate the damning implications of this research:

"Of course, the frontal cortex—where thinking and decision-making take place—is more complex in humans than it is in other animals. Thus, says Dr. Braun, it is important to be "really careful" about extrapolating the recent findings to human populations.

"The minute you get into stuff with extensive social and environmental components, the social differences between humans and animals are massive," says Simon Chapple, a senior economist in the social policy division of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the 30-country grouping of the world's largest economies."

Yes, caution should be warranted, and more extensive research should be carried out to see how fatherlessness affects brain development in human children.

HOWEVER.

Because research such as this greatly undercuts the legitimacy of Feminist theory and Feminist Public Policy, those who wish to continue said theories and policies are quick to backpedal with the "Humans are different" argument.

Nevermind the fact that if these findings had ZERO implications for humanity, the Journal would have ZERO interest in it and wouldn't even publish the story to begin with.

The "Humans are different" argument makes no sense in this case because we KNOW that the 80% (not an exact percentage, but a shorthand reference to the 80/20 principle) of children brought up in single parent families have all manner of negative outcomes in terms of wealth, health, crime, and relationships, just to name a few [1][2][3], just like the animals in the study.

Consider this article from Time Magazine:

Is There Hope for the American Marriage?


... the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported in May that births to unmarried women have reached an astonishing 39.7%. (See pictures of love in the animal kingdom.)

How much does this matter? More than words can say. There is no other single force causing as much measurable hardship and human misery in this country as the collapse of marriage. It hurts children, it reduces mothers' financial security, and it has landed with particular devastation on those who can bear it least: the nation's underclass.

The Marriage Gap

The poor and the middle class are very different in the ways they have forsaken marriage. The poor are doing it by uncoupling parenthood from marriage, and the financially secure are doing it by blasting apart their unions if the principals aren't having fun anymore.

The growing tendency of the poor to have children before marriage — the vast majority of unmarried women having babies are undereducated and have low incomes — is a catastrophic approach to life, as three Presidents in a row have tried to convince them. Bill Clinton's welfare-to-work program encouraged marriage, George W. Bush spent millions to promote marriage, and Barack Obama has spoken powerfully on the need for men to stay with their children: "We need fathers to step up, to realize that their job does not end at conception; that what makes you a man is not the ability to have a child but the courage to raise one." (See snapshots from a very special wedding.)

The reason for these appeals to lasting unions is simple: on every single significant outcome related to short-term well-being and long-term success, children from intact, two-parent families outperform those from single-parent households. Longevity, drug abuse, school performance and dropout rates, teen pregnancy, criminal behavior and incarceration — if you can measure it, a sociologist has; and in all cases, the kids living with both parents drastically outperform the others.

Few things hamper a child as much as not having a father at home. "As a feminist, I didn't want to believe it," says Maria Kefalas, a sociologist who studies marriage and family issues and co-authored a seminal book on low-income mothers called Promises I Can Keep: Why Poor Women Put Motherhood Before Marriage. "Women always tell me, 'I can be a mother and a father to a child,' but it's not true." Growing up without a father has a deep psychological effect on a child. "The mom may not need that man," Kefalas says, "but her children still do."

This turns out to be true across the economic spectrum. The groundbreaking research on the effects of divorce on children from middle- and upper-income households comes from a surprising source: a Princeton sociologist and single mother named Sara McLanahan, who decided to study the fates of these children with the tacit assumption that once you control for income, being part of a single-parent household does not adversely affect kids. The results — which she published in the 1994 book Growing Up with a Single Parent: What Hurts, What Helps — were surprising. "Children who grow up in a household with only one biological parent," she found, "are worse off, on average, than children who grow up in a household with both of their biological parents, regardless of the parents' race or educational background....

The outcomes for the experimental animals raised without a father were empirically negative. We know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the outcomes for human children raised without a father are overwhelmingly negative. We know that the animals in question and human beings share similar brain wiring.

Because we know all of this, is it reasonable then to say that we shouldn't use this study as another piece of evidence that, in the case of human children, fathers are needed, on a biological level, for them to achieve maximum levels of health, wealth, social stability, and happiness?

Would it be unreasonable to say that, because human brains and social structures are more complex and evolved, the impact of fatherlessness is more damaging and harmful for human children (and society) than for the lab rats (Degu) profiled in this study?

I want to address one more point in the WSJ article before I move on:

Risk of Delinquency

Still, the prevalence of single-parent households has researchers looking at possible consequences for children. An OECD report found that just 57% of children in the U.S. live with both parents, among the lowest percentages of the world's richest nations.

The report, which sparked some controversy when it was released in September, found that children in single-parent households have an increased risk of delinquency and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, or ADHD, as well as poorer scholastic performance.

The OECD also analyzed data from 122 separate studies and found that there was variability in the negative effects on children of living in a single-parent home; on average, the OECD found, the magnitude of the impact was relatively small. On a standardized intelligence test with a median score of 100 points, for example, a child in a single-parent family would be about 3.5 points worse off than a similar child in a two-parent family, according to Dr. Chapple, who co-wrote the report.

Dr. Braun's goal for future research is to figure out whether degu pups' brains can be rewired by introducing a substitute caregiver, such as a grandmother, or whether other social and emotional enrichment can help "repair" the fatherless pups, she says. Human children may be sent to day care, for instance, which can help them form stable friendships with their peers and other adults.

The bottom line, says Dr. Braun, is that parents need to fuel their children's brains with talk, touch and sensitive stimulation that involves give and take.

Parents, she says, "are the sculptors of their children's brains."

Note the following passage:

Dr. Braun's goal for future research is to figure out whether degu pups' brains can be rewired by introducing a substitute caregiver, such as a grandmother, or whether other social and emotional enrichment can help "repair" the fatherless pups, she says. Human children may be sent to day care, for instance, which can help them form stable friendships with their peers and other adults.

If, at some point in the future, research is conducted to find a way to help the children of single mothers (like me) and the children of divorce heal the ugly scars that our man hating culture and feminist public policy has imposed upon them, it would be absolute madness to think that someone in a lab could ultimately create a cure-all in a laboratory to help our children while at the same time keeping the aforementioned Misandric culture and feminist public policy that creates 80% of the problems in place!

It would save everyone a lot of time, energy, and resources if we abolished feminism right now. We have more than enough evidence to do so, and we have thousands of years of human social history that shows that stable marriage and family culture leads to long term positive outcomes.

The easiest and best way to prevent the negative outcomes of children raised in single parent homes is to STOP SEPARATING FATHERS FROM THEIR CHILDREN via involuntary divorce, domestic violence laws, and cultural bullying. KILL FEMINISM, AND YOU AUTOMATICALLY KILL THE PROBLEM.

Imagine, for a moment, that a coalition of Big Government types and ideologists who believed that right arms were inherently violent and dangerous passed a law that decreed that innocent children should have their potentially dangerous right arm removed when they reached the tender age of two years old. Imagine how society would be negatively impacted by the legion of children who are missing right arms.

Now finally, imagine the billions of dollars that would be spent in researching, testing, and manufacturing artificial arms to replace the arms that were removed, by force of law and bizarre custom, FOR NO GOOD REASON!

THIS, my friends, is where we are at today. Ideology, bad economic theory, and public policy are coming together to fuck up the lives of millions of innocent children (and fathers). And I am quite sure that some batshit insane feminists would have the audacity to suggest at some point that the solution to the problems that THEY caused initially is to do more "research" in order to repair the damage that was unnecessarily caused in the first place (notice the similarity of this kind of thinking to our totally ass backwards economic policy).

If anything, the ultimate goal of society should be to find out if human children are neurologically impacted (which I'm sure they are) by the removal of their fathers. And, if the research confirms it, add the study to the mountain of reasons why feminist public policy should be completely abolished forever and ever.

Before we move on, this story is interesting to me because it is another piece of evidence that points to an obvious conclusion: Fathers are needed in the lives of their children, and this is a biological and a spiritual need. All the daycare and all the government welfare kool-aid in this world will not change this important fact.





Where mind and matter meet.





And for my next act, I want to merge the importance of critical and careful programming of the conscious and subconscious mind with the implications that this Wall Street Journal story raises.


I would like to briefly quote from Dr. Bruce Lipton's fascinating book, the Biology of Belief:

... Frontier science is confirming what mothers and enlightened fathers have known forever, that parents do matter, despite best selling books that try to convince us otherwise. To quote Dr. Thomas Verny, a pioneer in the field of prenatal and perinatal psychiatry: "Findings in the peer-reviewed literature over the course of decades establish, beyond any doubt, that parents have overwhelming influence on the mental and physical attributes of the children they raise." (Verny and Kelly 1981) (p. 125).

And that influence starts, says Verny, not after children are born, but BEFORE (author's emphasis) children are born (p. 126).

... experimental psychologists and neuroscientists are demolishing the myth that that infants cannot remember--or for that matter learn--and along with it the notion that parents are simply spectators in the unfolding of their children's lives. The fetal and infant nervous system has vast sensory and learning capabilities and a kind of memory that neuroscientists call implicit memory... "the quality of life in the womb, our temporary home before we were born, programs our susceptibility to coronary artery disease, stroke, diabetes, obesity, and a multitude of other conditions in later life," writes Dr. Peter W Nathanielsz in Life in the Womb, Origins of Health and Disease (p. 126)."


... parents can improve the prenatal environment. In doing so they act as genetic engineers for their children... influences continue after the child is born because parents continue to influence their child's environment. In particular, fascinating new research is emphasizing the importance of good parenting in the development in the brain. "For the growing brain of a young child, the social world supplies the most important experiences influencing the expression of genes, which determines how neurons connect to one another in creating the neuronal pathways which give rise to mental activity," writes Dr. Daniel J Siegal in The Developing Mind (p. 127-128).

The Author goes on to explain the brain wave activity in children, the conscious and subconscious mind and how it is programmed, and a ton of other news you can really use.

Sounds a lot like the Wall Street Journal piece... doesn't it?? Young brain development, environmental factors, parental influence trumping supposedly predetermined genetic predestination...

Ladies and gents, I would highly recommend that you pick up this book. Don't walk... RUN and get a copy today. Your mind will never be the same again. Be sure to read it carefully, and reflect on the full implications of the information presented there.

How much damage has our policies of abortion on demand, involuntary divorce, and single mother subsidization really inflicted upon our nation? Can the full criminality of this entire Matriarchal regime be fully calculated?

Read the book, and you be the judge.



Conclusion.



UNDERSTAND.


Feminism is flat out and totally wrong. It is based on lies. It is based on false premises. The errors of feminism are infinite and plainly obvious. There is no excuse for any thinking individual to buy into or support this hate filled ideology.

The feminist lie of "children don't no need fathers" has been debunked all to hell. The truth is out there. There is no need to give feminism any credibility or credence in your conscious or your subconscious mind. De-program thyself! Banish feminist theory from your heart and mind forever.

And don't forget... you have a duty to yourself, your children, and your fellow man (and woman) to slay feminist ideology and public policy wherever you find it.

Your babies are being brainwashed by flawed, false, and outdated feminist theory. Men are going to jail everyday due to flawed and wrongheaded feminist public policy.

IT IS YOUR DUTY to oppose feminism by any means you can, within the boundaries of legality and common sense.

And finally, understand that YOU have tremendous power over yourself and those who are in your care. Know, Understand, and Obey the Universal Law.

You have the authority, the ability, the power, and the responsibility to elevate yourself and those you love to tha next level. You, Dear Reader, can and must work with the Father to make things happen.

Feminists can't hold you down forever. Governments who are out of control will be brought to heel eventually. Economic mismanagement won't last forever.

Understand the power you have to make the best out your personal circumstances. I can point out principles that have worked for me; but at the end of the day, your Thoughts, your Words, and your Deeds are the only ones that matter in your world and those who live in it. Choose correctly, and with great care.

Kind Regards,

Gyokko.

State of the black American Family.

Comrades,

Long time readers know that I am a man whose ancestors hail from Mozambique, Ireland, Germany, Israel, and parts unknown.

On U.S. Census forms, I identify myself as African American.

I've been writing for quite some time that the Afro-American family is dead, and that political feminism and government conspired to kill it. This is a subject that is near and dear to my heart.

Today, Dear Readers, I want to revisit this topic and chronicle the sad and bizarre situation that is black love, sex, marriage, and gender relations in 2009 America. On the bright side, some light bulbs are coming on. On the not-so-bright side, massive numbers of folks are suffering from tragically flawed political feminist public policy.

My gameplan is to share some stories of interest, and comment upon them as I see fit.

Is deal?

Ok, here we go!



Black Women still don't get it.


From MSNBC:

Marriage eludes high-achieving black women
Many remain single and childless, according to new research

By Brian Alexander
msnbc.com contributor
updated 8:31 a.m. ET, Thurs., Aug 13, 2009


Michelle Obama may have become an archetypal African-American female success story — law career, strong marriage, happy children — but the reality is often very different for other highly educated black women.

They face a series of challenges in navigating education, career, marriage and child-bearing, dilemmas that often leave them single and childless even when they’d prefer marriage and family, according to a research study recently presented at the American Sociological Society’s annual meeting in San Francisco.

Yale researchers Natalie Nitsche and Hannah Brueckner argued that “marriage chances for highly educated black women have declined over time relative to white women.” Women of both races with postgraduate educations “face particularly hard choices between career and motherhood,” they said, “but especially in the absence of a reliable partner...”

The plight of the (more often than not) ball busting African American career woman is both interesting and tragic on a number of levels.

For all of my natural life (30+ years), the guiding philosophy of (black and white) elites can be boiled down to: 'Little black girls are good and deserve all of our time, energy and resources, and little black boys are bad and deserved to be either stoned to death or locked up.'

Now that wasn't complicated, was it?

Black girls are the focus of numerous, well financed organizations and government bodies. Feminist groups, educational groups, civil rights groups, corporate entities, and others I can't think of at the moment have devoted an obscene amount of time and money to educate and elevate black women and girls to positions of power and influence in government, business, media, and academia.

Women (black and white) have benefited vastly from this concentrated effort. They have been less affected during our current economic downturn, they earn higher wages than men in certain major metropolitan areas, they are the majority of the nation's college and university students, and most importantly, the full force of feminist public policy is backing their every move.

In short, women can usually do no wrong.

By any objective measure, the efforts to elevate women over men have been quite effective. In the black community in particular, women rule in all the ways that matter.

With the exception of the money men and their manservants at the top of the food chain, America in general truly is a woman's nation.

I'm not saying this to be negative or self defeating, but only to acknowledge a hard fact. As I've been saying for quite a while: Women have all of the rights, privileges and prerogatives; while men only have responsibilities and liabilities.

Unfortunately for our lonely career woman, and for the nation in particular, the Matriarchal system is vastly inferior, less stable, and less productive than a society where male headship and the manly spirit of Thumos is the driving factor.

Proof of this can be found by comparing the fates of nations where the rights of men are respected and upheld, and the nations in which Matriarchy was public policy. Throughout history, the "Patriarchal" nations were more successful and productive because, sad to say, men value principles such as discipline, honor, and justice more than women do, and actually try to uphold them in a fair and impartial manner. Sometimes the efforts are successful, other times, not. But at least they try.

Furthermore, men and women are NOT the same. As a matter of fact, women and women are not the same. See here for posts dealing with the sliding scale of manliness and femininity [a][b].

Because of the absolute fact that men and women are different, and that women will seek certain kinds of men based on each individual's conscious and unconscious desires and needs, social conditioning be damned, many of today's successful black women, having drunk the feminist kool-aid, are finding that their degrees are hollow, their financial statements provide little warmth, and their lives are filled with loneliness.

The problem here is twofold:

1) The majority of black women are not brought up to attract, keep, or please a man who is in touch with his manliness or sense of honor. These women ignore the "good black men" and go for the "bad boy thug" who speaks to their deepest needs and desires. They have no inkling of what an honorable man is, or they simply don't see him because he doesn't have an MBA or doesn't drive a Mercedes Benz. In short, many of these women have contradictory programming and expectations, and are short circuited in their love lives as a result.

2) Our society is not producing the "evolved man" that the newly elevated black woman has been programmed to accept. The ideal black man that is on a higher level in terms of education, accomplishment, or success is a fairly rare commodity that is rapidly taken off the market by a huge number of hungry female competitors of all races and nations.

(I speak from personal experience; my Japanese wife aggressively pursued ME from the beginning of our relationship, and used all of her considerable womanly arts to seal the deal.)

Since this kind of sophisticated man is so highly desired by high powered black female career women, and the supply of such men is artificially limited by a misandric culture and wrongheaded public policy, shortages of "eligible men" are commonplace. One cannot artificially elevate one segment of the population, leave the other behind, and expect everything to turn out fine... unless you are a feminist that is.

Getting back to the article:

... And there’s the rub. As noted in a recent Sexploration column, contrary to old media reports, most educated, professional women who want to marry can and do marry. But the picture is less bright for high-achieving black women because “marriage markets” for them have deteriorated to the point that many remain unmarried, the researchers found. Since these women also feel pressured not to become single mothers, they often go childless as well, the researchers found...

Well, I'm glad to hear that at least some of these women choose not to become the scourge of American society, i.e. single mothers.

... In the study, Nitsche and Brueckner used data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey of 50,000 households dating back to the 1970s to tease out data points on race, gender, education, marriage and fertility.

Beyond the personal interests of individual women, the trend is significant because "in terms of American society, this is one additional obstacle” to the broadening of the black middle class, Brueckner said. Fewer highly educated black people having children means that they cannot pass on those advantages and knowledge.”

This defeats the goal of affirmative action, argue some demographers. The idea behind assuring that blacks had access to higher education and graduate school was that after a generation or so, African-Americans would reach a kind of achievement parity after generations of suffering educational and career restriction. But if black women, who comprise 71 percent of black graduate students, according to the census data, do not have children, the rate of achievement reaches a kind of familial dead end.

The massive explosion of Welfare and political feminist public policy has already killed the black family. It. Is. Already. Dead. The grossly unbalanced effort to elevate black women, and ignore, in all areas of life, the issues impacting black men, is just another nail in the coffin.

Declining marriage chances

One big reason why these women remained childless is, as one might expect, that they go unmarried, experts say. Among highly educated women of both races, about 22 percent between the ages of 20 and 45 were single in the 1970s. But then that number diverged. It has remained the same for white women, but now 38 percent of black women have never been married.

“Their marriage chances have declined,” Brueckner explained. “This may sound trivial but one reason is that they outnumber men in this education group.” The disparity in education is important because Americans have a strong tendency to marry those with equal levels of education, a trend that has only grown stronger since World War II. “So since there are fewer men with the same education,” Brueckner continued, “you either have to find another group you can marry or you are out of luck. You have nowhere to go.”

Highly educated black men tend to “outmarry” (marry outside race, religion or ethnicity) at a higher rate than black women, researchers say. Think of Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates or Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Both married white women.

Black women are either much more reluctant to marry outside their race, or do not have the opportunity to do so. The answer is both, Clarke said.

Actually, most women would like a man who has superior credentials to their own. Most women are seeking a man who is slightly, moderately, or completely superior with respect to status, intelligence, earning power, and so forth. But any woman who lives in a country that produces men with less status, less education, or less earning power is bound to be disappointed once she reaches a certain level.

Again, by stacking the deck against men in all of the areas of life that matter, it is inevitable that the offending society functions at a lower level in multiple areas than it otherwise could have.

The article also references black men who marry outside of their race. As a highly intelligent black man, my philosophy is that an awake and intelligent man should NEVER compromise and marry a woman who doesn't know what the meaning of the word wife is.

If a woman cannot cook, clean, have a pleasant and supportive attitude, be kind to my children, and have some intelligence and positive life experiences to bring to the table... then she is not wife material and shouldn't be touched with a ten foot pole.

And unfortunately, most black women fall into this category. Not only do most have ZERO wifely skills, they are UNWILLING to develop them. And, in this global marketplace of love we find ourselves in, black American women simply cannot compete with delectable Brazilian women, sultry African women, sweet Asian women, feminine European women, or women of any nationality who are in full possession of their womanly charms and aren't afraid to use them. The global competition that black women face today is unreal, and, from my personal experience at least, women worldwide are very kind to black men.

At the end of the day, black women need to step up. If they want to find male companionship, I would urge them to stop looking outside, and look inward. Because, sisters, you have a lot of internal work to do.

Time to take out the Political Feminist garbage.




Fatherless Youth at the Brink




From the Toledo Journal:

Black Youth Face Growing Threat of Violence from Peers

By: Kristin Gray

Special to the NNPA from the Afro-American Newspapers

Originally posted 10/8/2009

WASHINGTON (NNPA) - For soft-spoken honors student Derrion Albert, death came at the hands and feet of a savage mob of his peers.

Albert, 16, of Chicago, was brutally beaten as he walked home from school Sept. 26. The culprits, four angry Black boys between the ages of 16 and 19, were videotaped bludgeoning Albert with a railroad tie plank and pummeling him in an unprovoked fit of rage.

The church-going teen’s death has brought to light the ongoing war Black youth wage against one another. Even President Obama, whose former Chicago residence is less than an hour away from the site of Albert’s death, has called the grainy, two-minute cell phone video “chilling.”

Obama will deploy Attorney General Eric Holder and Education Secretary Arne Duncan, the former head of Chicago schools, to the Windy City next week to “talk about the issues of school violence and youth violence,” White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said Oct.1...

To paraphrase Ronald Reagan, government cannot solve this problem, because it IS the problem. Governments have all manner of laws that discourage marriage, discourage family formation, and enable women to separate fathers from their children anytime they choose. Under legal and social conditions such as these, is there any wonder that the children of single mothers (like me) and broken families living in economic depression are literally beating each other to death?

Feminist public policy and Fiat economic policy combine to devastate young black men. And yet, only a few can make the connection. Government will do nothing to solve this problem unless it repeals or reforms family and domestic violence laws, re-institutes the gold standard, eliminates individual income and payroll taxes, and eliminates the central bank.... but I wouldn't recommend holding your breath while waiting for these reforms to get done.

Back to the piece:

... While youth violence has decreased nationally since 2004, Black children represent an overwhelming majority of crime victims and crime perpetrators.

According to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) statistics released in 2008, the homicide rate among Black males ages 10 to 24 is more than double that of Hispanic and White males in the same age group, even though African-Americans are a minority population in the U.S.

The CDC also found that nearly 36 percent of students in grades 9 through 12 had been in physical fights in 2007, while 16.3 percent of male students surveyed said they had fought on school property. But statistics do little to explain why so many Black children are robbing each other of the opportunity to become adults. Some believe the breakdown of the Black family has created a generation of children lacking support at home and positive images of Black men. Others point to social Web sites like Facebook and YouTube as the new hangout for schoolyard bullies and promoters of teen-on-teen violence...

... nationwide, the Black family seems to be imploding.

Grandmothers are often forced to care for the offspring of their drug-addicted children and a sputtering economy has caused parents to spend longer hours on the job.

Even more troubling are the numbers of Black men and women committing to marriage. According to the 2008 Census Bureau Current Population Report, only 43 percent of Black women were married, compared to 79 percent of Asian women and 69 percent of White women. In the media, African-American fathers have been notoriously depicted as non-existent or transient parts of their children’s lives.

Both Conyers Johnese and Ogunronke point to firm parenting as the primary tool to prevent violence in young Black America.

“First and foremost, our children [and] youth need love, support and caring, as simple as that. If this is not in the household it indicates that these parents need assistance and help themselves,” Ogunronke said. “For parents that are struggling to do the right thing in raising their children, they should seek out resources within and outside of their community. They must also be willing to invest time within their hectic schedule to work with their children and those resources that are available and providing such services...”

As I wrote previously, the law is the lowest level of virtue. While I wholeheartedly agree that children need love, support, resources, and guidance, it also must be noted that all of these things are extremely difficult to provide to the youth if the entire system is set up to generate negative, wealth draining, and harmful outcomes.

Law and public policy is the foundation of a stable and productive society. If a country allows false accusations of rape, false accusations of domestic violence, unilateral divorce, wage slavery via child support obligations, and terrible economic and political policies in other areas, all of these seemingly abstract and separate conditions combine to sap the strength and the will from otherwise well intending individuals. If there is no justice coming from the law courts, the legislators and the executives, there will be no justice in the country. If people support and buy into harmful ideologies such as political feminism, then chaos, poverty, and injustice shall reign. It's a vicious cycle that generates wave after wave of destructive negative feedback loops.

No one should be surprised anymore by any horrendous outcomes our system brings into being.

I'll tell you one thing: unless and until we repeal all of the laws, and deep-six all of the anti-male attitudes that turn men off from marriage, family, and community life, you are going to see more shocking incidents than this.

Instead of trying to reform the political feminist system, they are going to declare open season and destroy as much of the Matriarchy as they can, however they can. How much you wanna bet that the wrong lessons will be learned from this and other harrowing incidents where a caring father and a stable family would have made all the difference?

How much you wanna bet that the violence and reprisals will only get worse, and not better?




Conclusion.




Political feminism is a dying movement. The young people know one of the two main reasons why their lives are less than ideal. Fiat money and misguided economic policy is the more hidden source of their problems. The problems that fatherlessness, brought to us by our political feminist friends, creates is more visible, and the children know it.


From the Washington Post:

Making the Grade Isn't About Race. It's About Parents.

"Why don't you guys study like the kids from Africa?"

In a moment of exasperation last spring, I asked that question to a virtually all-black class of 12th-graders who had done horribly on a test I had just given. A kid who seldom came to class -- and was constantly distracting other students when he did -- shot back: "It's because they have fathers who kick their butts and make them study."

Another student angrily challenged me: "You ask the class, just ask how many of us have our fathers living with us." When I did, not one hand went up.

I was stunned. These were good kids; I had grown attached to them over the school year. It hit me that these students, at T.C. Williams High School in Alexandria, understood what I knew too well: The lack of a father in their lives had undermined their education. The young man who spoke up knew that with a father in his house he probably wouldn't be ending 12 years of school in the bottom 10 percent of his class with a D average. His classmate, normally a sweet young woman with a great sense of humor, must have long harbored resentment at her father's absence to speak out as she did. Both had hit upon an essential difference between the kids who make it in school and those who don't: parents.

More and more people, of all races, are coming to understand that political feminism is their mortal enemy. They will also know that the twin evils of feminist public policy and fiat money, which causes all manner of economic chaos, flows from government, and persons acting in co-operation with government.

When the full enormity of these truths are grasped, maybe they will become Classical Liberals like me, and demand that the wild beast that is government be confined to its chains.

But until the truth is firmly and concretely understood, the masses might very well continue to blame men, push for more laws, and beef up the failed policies and ideas that have brought us to our current sorry state. We as enlightened men must understand this and stand ready to avoid the inevitable fallout, and be ready to educate the people during the aftermath.

In my case, I will continue to monitor the black American family. Without this venerable institution, my people will continue to struggle, suffer, and die unfulfilled. I will continue to make the case against political feminism until the day comes when it is broadly and publicly rejected.

I still firmly believe that day is coming. There will come a time when the pain that political feminism causes will be to great to be ignored. There will come a time when the rights of men will be respected and upheld by law and by custom, when all other options have failed.

And when that time comes, the black American family will live again. It will reconstitute itself; more rapidly than many might think.


Gyo.

Jewels for Your Consideration

Gang,

Guess I'm all shook up!

Or, maybe everyone is. The United States of America is undergoing a major crisis of confidence at the moment.

Most everyone is soul searching and pointing fingers, looking for causes and solutions to our ongoing Depression.


To aid you in your search for truth, here are a few items I'd like to share.


Alex Jones: Fall of the Republic.

This two hour flick has it all: financial shenanigans, the fake Left/Right paradigm, Plato and his old skool foolishness, and of course, the New World Order.

It's well worth your time to give this one a look.


Financial Sense Newshour: The Warning.


This podcast is must listen to material, as it deals with Derivatives, coverups, political hardball, and, most interesting from a Men's Rights Perspective, proof positive that:



1) Political feminists such as Ms. Born are (unbeknownst to most feminists themselves) nothing more than slave girls to the Money Men, who hold real power.

2) The Money Men have no qualms about keeping their political feminist hoes in check when they start interfering in "Grown Folk Business." Notice how these non-feminist men thought nothing about running Ms. Born out of town when she (correctly) tried to put a stop to the massively leveraged Derivatives casino.

As a brief aside, click here for an interesting article about how the feminist movement was funded by the CIA. I am shocked... shocked!!!









Happy viewing/listening!

Gyo.

John Gatto: Weapons of Mass Instruction

Gang,

Here is a four hour expose of American education entitled Weapons of Mass Instruction.

Would you like to know how and why the Average American has been dumbed down beyond belief?

Then this video is for you.

Highly recommended.

Edit: If the above vid isn't working, click here for more
John Gatto.

Demise of the Dollar, Demise of Political Feminism.

Team,

I've got a lot to share in this transmission, so let's get right to it!



Demise of the Dollar?



As most of my dear Readers know, I have been writing about my economic fears for some time now. I have even gone so far as to blame fiat currency, as well as massive amounts of borrowing and spending, for most of the ills that plague the nation.

Fiat monopoly money and drunken sailor style government spending provides billions for wars, billions for health care reform, billions for feminism (see here and here), and trillions for bailouts, guarantees, loans and swaps to criminal banksters who nearly destroyed the American financial system.

Questions to ask yourself:

1) How does a bankrupt nation manage to spend trillions of dollars it doesn't have?

2) Does spending trillions on bailouts, bombs, and political feminist pet projects lead to ever increasing levels of efficiency, effectiveness, productivity, capital formation, and happiness?

3) Can a nation continue to print money, squander its resources, mislead its citizens while trampling their most basic rights underfoot, AND piss off its increasingly unhappy foreign creditors indefinitely?


I believe that we are running out of time to turn the ship of State around, and events this week have solidified my convictions. Reality is catching up to us, and it is going to bite us square on the collective ass in the very near future.

Please see the following article by Jim Willie CB:

The story hit like a thief in the night, even bearing Biblical proportions. The end of the exlusive sale of MidEast oil in USDollars, the rise of Russian and Chinese influence in the Persian Gulf, the rise in importance for the Intl Monetary Fund basket of currencies, the final clarion call for the free ride by Americans on the Dollar Credit Card, and hidden implications that the Saudis must shop for a new security lord in the region with broad military might, these are revolutionary steps with profound geopolitical implications. The back-to-back stories in the UK Independent struck like powerful bolts of lightning in the middle of the night from a North American perspective. These articles by a highly respected journalist will be posted on the Banker Church Doors just like Martin Luther’s demands for change in the Protestant Reformation that smashed the monopolistic power of the Catholic Church centuries ago. Enough of the mixed metaphors. This is truly incredible news. The US will soon no longer be permitted to sell its indulgences. This is major Paradigm Shift material...

... A quick read is required of two articles by Robert Fisk. He touches at the surface on a great many relevant and salient points. This story and its vast consequences will be discussed and analyzed for a full year. This is the biggest story on the USDollar in decades, sure to further develop...

...

“A Financial Revolution with Profound Political Implications”
“Demise of the Dollar”

Gents, be sure to read the above mentioned articles, as they are of vast importance in a multitude of ways.

While I don't believe that the dollar will be replaced as the reserve currency of the world in the near future, there is always the possibility that a new global currency could come like a thief in the night. It's possible that the U.S. dollar could be devalued, openly or in secret, in order to pay down trillions in debt. It's also very likely that the Bond market could impose harsh fiscal discipline on the U.S. as our mind boggling deficits continue to mount.

Foreign creditors and the U.N, now openly in revolt against the dollar system, hold all of the cards in this deadly game of economic poker. My worst fears are coming to fruition in slow motion. But on the bright side, I expect foreign financing of the above mentioned wasteful Fedgov spending to be greatly reduced in the years ahead. There is no way around the fact that massive, earthshaking change is coming.

However, change isn't always a bad thing. In fact, if one is prepared to ride it out, change can be both profitable and enjoyable.

Let's look closely at The Demise of the Dollar article by Robert Fisk:

... In a graphic illustration of the new world order, Arab states have launched secret moves with China, Russia and France to stop using the US currency for oil trading

In the most profound financial change in recent Middle East history, Gulf Arabs are planning - along with China, Russia, Japan and France - to end dollar dealings for oil, moving instead to a basket of currencies including the Japanese yen and Chinese yuan, the euro, gold and a new, unified currency planned for nations in the Gulf Co-operation Council, including Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait and Qatar.

Secret meetings have already been held by finance ministers and central bank governors in Russia, China, Japan and Brazil to work on the scheme, which will mean that oil will no longer be priced in dollars.

The plans, confirmed to The Independent by both Gulf Arab and Chinese banking sources in Hong Kong, may help to explain the sudden rise in gold prices, but it also augurs an extraordinary transition from dollar markets within nine years...

Of course, diplomats 'round the world have denied that any meetings took place. And some very well respected financial commentators have pointed out that even if the above mentioned countries were to price oil in other currencies besides the dollar, the world would not come to an end.

Financially speaking, I agree that it wouldn't be such a big deal if oil were priced in Euros or Yen instead of the dollar. From a political perspective, however, the abandonment of a dollar standard would be huge. Remember that Fiat currencies work because people believe and have confidence in the currency. No one uses pieces of paper labeled dollars because they think they have value in and of itself.

They use the dollar because the full faith and credit of the State supposedly guarantees the currency, and legal tender laws compel people to accept them. And in normal times, the risk/reward ratio of complying with legal tender laws induces people to go along with the fairy tale of fiat fundage. Normally, its not worth the time and effort to challenge the validity of the federal reserve note because of its ease of usage in exchanges and the payment of debts.

Because fiat currency is nothing more than a confidence game, anything that rocks the Dollar reserve currency boat has vastly negative political, psychological, and ultimately, financial and economic consequences. The mere fact that dollar negative articles and reports are appearing with more and more frequency speaks volumes. If someone had written the above articles back in tha day, no one in their right mind would take them seriously.


When's the last time someone you know said "Almighty" and "dollar" in the same sentence?













The very idea that global precious metals and foreign exchange markets would be rocked by Mr Fisk's article is another troubling sign that America is heading down the road to serfdom.


Big picture worries aside, however, I'm smiling a lot these days. Why?

Current events on multiple fronts leads me to believe that fiat money, as well as the political feminist order that feeds off of it, is another step closer to oblivion.

My personal net worth has increased, thanks to recent gains in gold, silver, and precious metals equities. That's always a positive. On top of that, I don't spend a lot of time monitoring the markets. Mostly, I sit on my arse for a few minutes, visit a few favored websites, convert federal reserve notes to gold and 90% silver coins, and resume playing Street Fighter 4 like there's no tomorrow (for those who wanna battle, find me on Xbox Live. Gamertag: Mamo187)...











... and for those interested in obtaining physical gold and silver bullion, check these links for precious metals websites I use regularly.

Disclosure: Please note that I have no financial interest, nor am I being paid to share these links. Also, precious metals investing is a risky business, so I would urge you to speak with your registered financial adviser before investing in any financial asset.

[a][b][c]






Demise of Political Feminism?





I would like to point out that the nations mentioned by Mr Fisk in his article include China, Japan, the Arab states, and Russia. As I've written previously, none of these nations is a fan or supporter of Political Feminism. I've also asserted that a Perfect Storm is going to tear the ship of political feminism apart. It will not long survive the upheaval that is sure to come.

It cannot be denied that feminism is strongest in the English speaking world, and that the United States is one of the biggest exporters and supporters of global feminist jihad [1][2].

As discussed previously, the Arab states, China, and others are fully aware of this fact and are even now inoculating themselves against feminist corruption. And while feminists do hold some sway in nations such as Japan, they are weak and largely ignored. Which, by the way, is the appropriate response to such a radical, deceitful, and dangerously destructive ideology.

When (not if) our foreign creditors assume more political and financial power on the world stage, methinks that the fortunes of global political feminism will be crushed underfoot. When these nations, who are quite hostile to feminism, decide what gets funded and what doesn't, do you really think they are going to provide the femmes the generous fiat bankroll that they currently enjoy here in America? Is there another financially solvent nation that is going to take up the political feminist football and run with it on the world stage?

France? Canada? New Zealand? Australia?

Don't think so.

Even in feminist Sweden, the ideological basis of feminism is coming under attack (respect to Men's News Daily for the story).

What IS this crazy world coming to??

Going forward, I think that the nations of the world will agree that American (and British) style feminism would be better off dying a quiet death, alone and forgotten, in a very dark alley. After all, most of our creditor nations have much higher esteem for marriage, family, and male headship than we do here in the States.

Sad but true.


Conclusion


The world is changing. I know you can feel it in your bones. You feel like the ground is shifting under your feet.

Courage friend. We must has courage.

Things are changing. Political feminism is losing the war. Fiat money, the root of all evil, is coming under attack. The massive failures of both of these ideas are coming into increasing focus day after day. Frauds are being exposed, and the implications are earthshaking.

While some of us have found out that most everything we were taught in government schools is a lie, most of us will learn in time. We will discover that modern day marriage is the ultimate bait and switch. We will understand that our government commits unconstitutional acts on a daily basis.

We will know that our spiritual leaders and our medical doctors have deceived us.

Withheld certain truths.

Sold us salt, knowing we are snails.

Obscuring our full potential.

Holding us captive with mental chains.

I know its difficult to adjust to all of these revelations. Fear not.

I smile a lot more than I did when I first fell down the rabbit hole. I've come to a place where the falsehoods and Machiavellian power plays of political feminists and others do not affect my spirit.

And, with open eyes, I consciously make decisions that determine my own destiny. I chase my own goals, and work, in a self directed manner, towards the fulfillment of my dreams.

And so, Dear Reader, I would advise that you steer clear of the dangers. Limit your entanglements. Stay flexible. Know the law. Understand finance and economics. Research spiritual matters with open eyes and a clean slate. Make good decisions that are in your best interests, and that benefit both yourself and society at large.

Slow down. 80% of what we do doesn't matter. But 20% of the decisions we make matter a great deal. Focus.

Stay free. Keep your nose clean. Keep a low profile. Plan your work, and work your plan.

The world is changing, and it's best to keep out of harms way until the dust settles.

And above all... relax! Life is good sometimes.

More to come.

Gyokko.

The Writing on the Wall.

Ladies and gents,

Thanks for your patience as I work on my next series of posts.

Slightly off topic for a second, I should note that the family and I have just returned from Toronto, Canada.

Gyokko the Kidd works damn hard, so I decided to visit our northern neighbor for some much needed R&R. And let me tell you... I came away very impressed. We had an awesome time, outstanding micro brewed beer, and the locals were excellent hosts besides. I haven't experienced such a level of Metropolis sized politeness since I left Japan.

And of course, your humble author dropped in on the Toronto Stock Exchange, and visited some of the major players on Bay Street.

(What can I say? I'm a total Finance junkie. So sue me!!!)

Another amusing observation: Women literally mobbed my eight month old son wherever we went. From 5 years old to 50, ladies of all extractions fawned over him like groupies on an aging rock star.

Yep Yep... a chip off the old block! He is definitely going to be a heartbreaker... and fully informed about the dangers of marriage and family life if political feminism is still an issue when he comes of age. And if the femmes are still squawking their useless and irrelevant crappola... then I pity the feminist who tries to break my boy's spirit. He shall be well schooled to underhanded feminist tactics.

Poor dears.

But enough about me and my international adventures. I wanted to share these jewels with you while I continue my research.

First up, Mr. Howard Katz explains why there is No Retirement:

... The first thing to learn about retirement is that it is a fairly new idea in the scheme of things. Prior to 1785-86, there was no retirement. Everybody worked until they died (unless they were rich, in which case they did not work at all).


Retirement was invented in 1785-86 by Noah Webster, who is best known for being the author of the first American dictionary. Webster, then a young man, took a trip through the 13 newly independent states in 1785-86. He talked to state legislators and other influential people, and he convinced them to legalize interest. (This was only done in the northern states; the South waited until after the Civil War.) The following year the British philosopher, Jeremy Bentham, wrote a paper entitled, “In Defense of Usury [Interest],” and interest was legalized in Britain shortly thereafter.


Once receiving interest was legal, people began to save. A normal rate of interest from 1788 until 1933 was 5%. As people saved, they would put their money in the savings bank or purchase a corporate bond. Here is how it worked. Suppose a man whose average salary was 30 oz. of gold per year saved an average of 6 oz. each year. His first year’s savings receives interest for 49 years (age 16 to 65). His last year’s savings receives interest for 1 year. His average year’s savings receives interest for 25 years. This means that the money he saves multiplies by 3.4 times due to the working of compound interest. If you can save 6 oz. of gold each year, then over a 49 year working lifetime, he has saved 294 oz. of gold. Since compounding at 5% per year multiplies this by 3.4, he now as a total capital of 999 oz. of gold. At 5% interest, he would receive earnings of 50 oz. of gold per year, 1.7 times his annual salary. With this incentive, Americans (and British) began to save. They would quit work at age 65 and live off the interest on their accumulated savings. This had never before happened in world history...

Notice that individuals at this time did not have to speculate in the financial markets, or pay expensive brokers, commissions, and money managers. Also note that, along with the compounding of interest that occurred year after year, the value of the (gold or silver) money saved gradually increased over time due to advances in technology and productivity.

That, ladies and gentlemen, is wealth creation and capital formation.

When I and others harp about why inflation is harmful to your financial health (unless you are a savvy businessman or an investment banker who knows how to profit in an inflationary environment), this is what I am talking about. The ignorance of the people, and the cunning of the financial overlords who are supposed to be guiding the average investor to "retirement" and "financial freedom" leads to debt slavery, a greatly reduced quality of life, and eventual death without having anything to show for their years and years of hard work.

KINDA SOUNDS LIKE MARRIAGE... DOESN'T IT?

Once a honored institution that served to advance the greater society and its members, it has now been altered, by legal sleight of hand, into a virtual deathtrap. Once an institution that contributed greatly to wealth, happiness, and virtue, it has been perverted into a sacrament that leads to ruination and despair.

All due, once again, to the ignorance of the people, and the treachery of those who claim to be our authority figures.

My ultimate point being: Feminism is a symptom of a larger malaise. Recognize, Accept, and Adjust as needed. No one is going to do it for you, and Going Your Own Way is critical to your survival and happiness.

Be sure to read the entire piece, as it is extremely important that you understand the implications and adjust your gameplan accordingly.


Next up:

Please watch this video featuring Mr. Jim Rickards.









This is a sobering clip. Mr. Rickards makes the point that many "hard money" financial types such as Peter Schiff, Marc Faber, Ron Paul, and others have made a million times over.

Mainly: The U.S. dollar will be devalued on purpose. And as the dollar goes, so does the wealth and the prosperity of the people. All in the effort to default on Trillions worth of debt. The Gold price will "necessarily" be manipulated by the Fed and others to hide this all important fact from the People.

Again, gentlemen, it's time to Go Your Own Way. No matter what the subject, your sex life, your marriage, your money or your health, someone else wants to impose an agenda upon you that is NOT in your best interests, or in the best interests of the general society.

These people see you as a snail, and they have gallons of SALT that they want to sell you.









It's time to declare your independence gentlemen. And don't forget, in your haste to liberate yourself, that you have a responsibility to unplug other willing souls from the Fematrix.



In solidarity,

Gyokko.

Things to think about.

Gang,

Sorry I've kept you. I have been busy pouring through various VAWA related publications in preparation for my next series of posts.

As I read the various documents, I'm amazed how much fiat fundage flows to feminist pork projects...

So bear with me so I can make sense of all this before I start talking about the virtues of feminist finance.


In the meantime, I would like to leave you with some interesting links:


1) C-Span coverage of the 09-12-09 Taxpayers March on Washington (courtesy of Infowars.com).

Please take a few moments and check it out.

Needless to say, I'm glad that so many attended this protest, and that it was carried on all of the major media outlets. Unless Americans want to doom themselves to eternal serfdom, we need to let it be known that ONLY limited, Constitutional government that protects life, liberty, and property is acceptable.

We have created government to be an impartial referee that upholds the natural rights and responsibilities of ALL the People. We DO NOT need government to be an all powerful ruler that micromanages all aspects of people's lives.

It feels good to know that Americans have finally caught the protest bug, because, as many first time protests have probably discovered, the spoken and written Word has tremendous power.

Remember Team:

No realization of a given goal can come into fruition without the use of Sanmitsu:

Thoughts, Words, and Deeds working together in harmony.

Complaining about the state of affairs solves nothing by itself. Only thinking deeply about a problem accomplishes nothing. Mindless action is a waste of time.

When you do all of the above however...

In any event, methinks that the Washington protest will be the first of many. And I predict that the protests will only be more strident and high profile until the government is forced to straighten up and fly right.

See this passage from Machiavelli's The Prince that explains why Americans will NEVER completely forsake their traditions of liberty. After all, all POWER is in the hands of the People.


2) Please watch this fascinating series of videos by Dr. Bruce Lipton. He makes a very strong argument that beliefs held by the mind control one's multi-dimensional reality. His observation is supported by thousands of years of religious and spiritual teachings about the nature of Mind, Body and Soul, as well as the personal testimony of legions of people throughout the ages.

Dr Lipton's work supports my own thesis that one must be very, very careful about what you consider as truth, and what belief system colors your view of the world.

Unfortunately, many people do not consciously and rationally choose their beliefs based on research, reflection, contemplation, and real life experience. Instead, they believe whatever their "Higher Authorities" have implanted in their minds, and then proceed to build castles of stone upon intellectual foundations of sand.

My personal truthseeking quest began about three years ago... and I am still searching. I am constantly questioning facts, figures, and belief systems to find out what the truth actually is. More often than not, I have found that there are usually multiple points of view regarding any general subject, and that perception and desire play a large role in shaping a religious system, a scientific study, or a school of economics.

However, there are a few key Universal Laws that apply at all times and under all circumstances, and the application of these principles allows one to achieve a desired state of being.

Now a key point here is... what is the desired state of being? What is the goal?

And most importantly... Is this desired outcome something you have chosen, or are you bringing about the goals and objectives of somebody else? Are these outcomes in your best interest? Are you in control of the process, or is someone else pulling your strings??

In short, my friends, I am asking that you take a hard look at your basic assumptions about life. Are they yours? Or are they the ideals and dreams of someone else? Do your beliefs help you accomplish the things you want to do in life, or are they harmful to yourself and others? Do your beliefs harmonize with the Universal Laws that govern all levels of existence?

Or to restate the question: Are you a feminist? Why are you a feminist? Who told you to be a feminist? Do the desired goals and outcomes of feminism help yourself and others or are they harmful? Do feminist goals and objectives lead to greater happiness, productivity, wealth, and spiritual growth in the real world, or do they impede these things?


Review, Examine, and Guard your thoughts carefully my Dear Readers. There are a lot more psychic vampires in the world than you might think...


3) Ron Paul's latest book, End the Fed.

This book, along with the Creature from Jekyll Island, explains in bloodcurdling detail the fraud that is the Federal Reserve, as well as why it should be abolished completely.

Short, crisp, and powerful, End the Fed is a must, must read.


Alright team, it's time for me to get back to my Laboratory.

See you next crime...


Gyokko.