Breaking down the Political Feminist movement. Until balance is brought back to Heaven and Earth, our family brings the fight to the enemy with an invincible combination ancient knowledge, esoteric wisdom, and impregnable tactics.
Sunday, January 18, 2009
The Lost Art of Discipline Part V.
(Image Courtesy of the Spanking Blog, a site for 18 year olds and over only.)
Greetings! It's been a while since my last post. Sorry about the delay: The Kidd has pressing real life obligations that I have to attend to.
Also, please note that at the end of this series of posts, I am going to take a three week hiatus. I have begun research for my book/documentary project, and I want to focus on that for a few weeks to really get things moving.
Be advised that this is an extremely long post. I would recommend that you read a little bit at a time, walk away from it, and come back. I won't be posting again until next Sunday, so feel free to relax and take your time.
Without further ado, let's get to the heart of the matter!
... Does the typical woman really want a man who complies with the letter and the spirit of these laws? If men strictly adhere to these rules and guide their conduct accordingly, is this what society really needs and wants in order to survive and thrive? Will this code of conduct contribute to the ultimate stability of long term relationships?
If we accept that the letter of the Domestic Violence law is the lowest level of human development, does the public at large want the "virtues" that these laws help to shape?
My answer to this question is: No, the typical woman would never tolerate the existence of these laws for any period of time if the average couple on the street followed the law to the letter...
... Bitch
(1) Word used to describe the act of whining excessively.
(2) Person who rides specifically in the middle of a front-seatting only car meant for 2 passengers or less.
(3) Modern-day servant; A person who performs tasks for another, usually degrading in status.
(4) Term used to exclaim hardship.
(1) "Stop bitching Todd!" (2) "Can I ride bitch?" (3) "Bring my friend and I some vodka bitch" (4) *Peron tells story to other cellmate, depicting how they came to be there, cellmate says* "Ain't that a Bitch!"
bitch
An exceedingly whipped guy who does/wears/thinks/says whatever his girlfriend tells him to.
The next few posts are going to make two key arguments:
1) While women (and men) want and deserve to be protected from unexpected, unprovoked, and traumatic attacks against their person, and that they expect laws such as those that prohibit Assault, Battery, Rape, and Murder, to be on the books to protect them from such violent crime; the typical woman, in real life, do not want the unintended social consequences that unconstitutional, deceitfully conceived, poorly written and unjustly enforced Domestic Violence laws have created.
The difference between laws prohibiting Assault, Battery, and Murder and the bulk of Domestic Violence law is varied and profound.
Traditional criminal law involves rules, procedures and institutions designed to provide maximum protection for the Defendant, and requires the Prosecutor to substantially prove his case.
Probable cause, various forms of evidence, constitutional safeguards, rules of evidence and court, the presumption of innocence, burdens of proof, the Jury system... all of these things can typically be found in criminal proceedings. Constitutional rights are (more or less) respected and upheld during trials for Assault, Rape, and other traditional criminal offenses.
Domestic Violence laws, on the other hand, may or may not offer basic constitutional protections. It has been conclusively proven that men are discriminated against when it comes to Restraining Order proceedings. Loss of employment, property, and liberty have been known to occur on accusations alone. And even if the jurisdiction where your DV case is being tried considers DV to be a criminal rather than a civil offense (insuring more traditional constitutional protections and a jury trial), the perception that Domestic Violence laws are nothing more than weapons for always-innocent-women to be used against always-in-the-wrong men is a powerful psychological tool that women use to leverage their power over men.
While they may seemingly benefit from this perversion of the justice system in the short run, the vast majority of women who desire a long term, committed relationship with a man in full possession of his manliness lose out in the long term, as we shall see in the next few posts on this topic.
2) Women want a man that will stand up to them if that is required. The typical feminine woman, who possesses a unique mixture of masculine and feminine energies, wants a man who is stronger than she. The strength of the man she wants will depend on her own level of strength.
When women ask the question, Can you handle this?
They aren't asking because they are idly curious... they really want to know if you are able and willing to do so.
If a woman finds herself with a man that isn't able to "handle" her, then, after a time, she will more than likely begin to seek out someone who can, or she will begin prodding your defenses until you either shape up, or ship out. This tendency, which we will discuss at length, is why Good Girls like Bad Boys.
Why women really don't want the climate Domestic Violence hysteria has created.
Aiight then... so it's time for Toku "Pretty Boy" Gakure to start breakin' it down.
There are a number of commonly reported interactions in which violence against men erupts. Here is one example that illustrates a common dynamic.
The woman is mildly distressed and upset. The man notices her distress and then worries she may become angry.
The correct thing to do here is to take care of business right off the bat. The wise man, understanding women to have ever changing moods and feelings...
At this stage, all is lost. The man can either move out, or take the beatings. He becomes aware of how weak his legal and moral position really is, and the ailing relationship can only be reversed with great time, energy, and expense that both parties may not have at this point.
And all of this has come to pass because of legally and culturally sanctioned ignorance.
Another family destroyed, and yet more children scarred because of all powerful Feminist Public Policy.
Conclusion for Part V.
I realize that this was a very long post, and I thank you for bearing with me. This is such an important and neglected topic that it deserves a lengthy and thorough treatment.
As we have seen in the hypothetical, yet extremely common scenario above, real life relationships cannot survive if a man adheres to DV laws and cultural expectations to the letter. Following the spirit and the letter of the law leads to anger, frustration, and the ultimate destruction of the pairing.
And most importantly, the destructive agent in this scenario is the woman, who is deeply offended by the various logical measures the man implements in order to comply with Feminist public policy. She does not want a 100% DV compliant man, nor does she appreciate the unintended consequences that flow from such legislation.
What she wants is a real man who is capable and comfortable with himself and his manliness. She wants a man who is able to choose the appropriate actions needed to preserve the harmony and the longevity of the relationship. When this leadership and manliness is lacking, then she will almost unconsciously pick and pick at the man until he either implodes, or gives her what she wants, which includes genuine emotion, the willingness to solve difficulties in the appropriate way, and the ability to dispense discipline when it is needed and appropriate.
Without these qualities, she will do everything in her power to either build her man up, or tear him down and find another man who is stronger.
I know this sounds politically incorrect and incredibly old-skool... but real life experience bears out the truth of my words on a daily basis.
I realize that the hypothetical scenario above is just one example of how real life plays out. So consequently, our investigation will continue in Part VI.
In the next post, we will explore my second point:
2) Women want a man that will stand up to them if that is required. The typical feminine woman, who possesses a unique mixture of masculine and feminine energies, wants a man that is stronger than she. The strength of the man she wants will depend on her own strength.
Until next time,
Toku "Pretty Boy" Gakure.
2 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Standing up to a woman in the short run is one thing. In particular, "laying down the law" is easier when the woman can expect no reinforcements in the short run.
In the long run, given that the woman has access to the American legal system, I doubt that any man could prevail while remaining in contact with any woman.
In the medium term, I've found that simply walking away from demanding women often causes them to initially throw themselves at some other man, and then come crawling back. While the "walk away" strategy can work for pump-and-dump dating, it's not a feasible way to run a long-term relationship.
I don't think I've ever successfully dictated terms to a woman while remaining in a sexual relationship with her. I have talked sense into a girl after I made it clear that I would never sleep with her.
"While the "walk away" strategy can work for pump-and-dump dating, it's not a feasible way to run a long-term relationship."
Exactly.
And the effect of all of these laws is to defang the snake. There is no possible way that a man can manage his relationship with his woman in the long run with all of these restrictions in place.
When even getting loud with your girl is a criminal offense, its pretty much curtains for any long term relationship.
Welcome.
This blog chronicles one black man's daily struggle against Political Feminism; a hate movement which destroys love between Men and women.
Kirigakure School is a place to explore the cultural impact that Political Feminism has upon the Male and female Sex by means of essay, analysis (social, financial, and political), and creative stories.
Above all, Kirigakure School is the place where today's modern man comes to FREE his mind from Political Feminist indoctrination!
The Civil Flag of the United States: Symbol of the Constitution and the Common Law.
The speech contained in this blog is protected by the Constitution of the United States. Kumogakure does not necessarily agree with all viewpoints expressed on the blogs or websites linked herein. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Read all about it! The Civil Flag of the united states.
2 comments:
Standing up to a woman in the short run is one thing. In particular, "laying down the law" is easier when the woman can expect no reinforcements in the short run.
In the long run, given that the woman has access to the American legal system, I doubt that any man could prevail while remaining in contact with any woman.
In the medium term, I've found that simply walking away from demanding women often causes them to initially throw themselves at some other man, and then come crawling back. While the "walk away" strategy can work for pump-and-dump dating, it's not a feasible way to run a long-term relationship.
I don't think I've ever successfully dictated terms to a woman while remaining in a sexual relationship with her. I have talked sense into a girl after I made it clear that I would never sleep with her.
"While the "walk away" strategy can work for pump-and-dump dating, it's not a feasible way to run a long-term relationship."
Exactly.
And the effect of all of these laws is to defang the snake. There is no possible way that a man can manage his relationship with his woman in the long run with all of these restrictions in place.
When even getting loud with your girl is a criminal offense, its pretty much curtains for any long term relationship.
Post a Comment