Ron Paul is Right: The Self Made Jihad Problem Part II.

Greetings!

Sorry I've kept you... but the Kidd has a lot of outside activities going on at present.

It's hard to be the King!

Let's get to work.


Problem, Reaction, Solution.

Today I will present more evidence to support Dr. Ron Paul's assertion that terrorism is the ultimate result of Western foreign policy gone horribly wrong.

And in my opinion, this understanding is crucial because the so-called War on Terror is being used to bludgeon the people into accepting massive violations of their God given Natural rights that they wouldn't even begin to tolerate otherwise.

What we are seeing here, in my opinion, is the classic ploy of Problem, Reaction, Solution:

(Government created or enhanced) Problem, Reaction (from the public demanding protection), and Solution (which normally increases the power of the State).

If you think about it, one can recognize the exact same pattern with respect to Domestic Violence and Divorce laws. Government sponsored feminist policies conjured up the alleged "epidemic" of violence against women and falsely accused Men and "the Patriarchy" as the root cause of the aforementioned problem.

The poor people, who displayed their usual mix of compassion and ignorance, went along as government officials and feminist groups demanded that government DO SOMETHING! After all, there is NO EXCUSE FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, and who the hell needs secure and stable marriages? Because marriage is slavery for women right?

Unfortunately, the People were quite unaware that the Platonic feminist philosophy that was spearheading these radical changes, along with the mystery men who supported them were anything but truthful, and a far cry from the advocates of equality [a][b] that they claimed to be.

And so, in response to less than popular demand, the powers that be proceeded to encourage the dissolution of marriages on a wide scale, legalized the murder of unborn children and eliminated the Rights of Men to be fathers and husbands, created unconstitutional and decidedly uncivil divorce tribunals, formulated revenue generating child support schemes, and other "solutions" that led the people to believe that government was really taking care of business.

And before you knew it, government had acquired all manner of power and authority over the family lives of the American People, even though such widespread abuse of power was NOT authorized under various constitutions both State and Federal.

Sadly, we are all aware of the negative consequences of America's War on Fathers.

PROBLEM, REACTION, SOLUTION.

Works every time!

What MRAs and Truthseekers should always keep in mind is that anytime there is injustice, or when the rights of the people are violated as they are today, government, or government sponsored groups, are usually behind it. And where there is injustice, the government can usually be found upholding it, as in the case of slavery in the American South. The Freedom movement spearheaded by Doctor Paul and the Men's Rights movement spearheaded by outstanding gentlemen from around the world are one in the same, and thus are natural allies.



Government Backed Jihadism.



According to the work The Globalists and the Islamists:

Over the past half-century religion has been in decline in the Western part of the world and in most of the East as well. Spirituality has been traded for materialism as living standards have increased, and popular culture has become almost completely secular as well.

Why has the situation been different within the Middle East? How come the Judeo-Christian ethic has eroded, but the Islamic ethic has experienced an apparent resurgence? This study will try to explain how this situation is not something that has occurred by chance and it will offer evidence that militant Islam has been a card played by the global elites of the dominant Anglo-American establishment to achieve the long-term goal of a world government (Goodgame, Part I)...

Long time readers of this blog know that organizations such as the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group, and the CFR are real groups of real people with very concrete goals and objectives. And global governance is very high on that agenda.

These people are playing for all the marbles. If they can influence media coverage and international politics, then why would it be out of their reach to influence radical Islamic Jihad as well? What better instrument of government backed terror is there than a group of third worlders who are ready to die for the sake of Allah? What greater obstacle to world government than a block of strong, wealthy, nationalist and modern middle east states who would potentially be opposed to a Supernational government?

The entire scheme makes total diabolical sense, and today I will begin to show evidence to prove beyond doubt that our government has aided and abetted people who have sworn to kill us.

Getting back to The Globalists and the Islamists:

...the British used Islam to legitimize their puppet rulers in Jordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Palestine after taking over the Middle East in World War I. Because of this Islam was seen by much of the Arab populace as just another part of the corrupt colonial establishment. That is why the legitimate anti-colonial movements, such as those of Nasser, Mossadegh and Bhutto, were primarily secular in nature. When these nationalist movements began to succeed outside of the British sphere of influence the British turned to their Islamic allies to subvert these independent regimes. The Muslim Brotherhood stands out as the most important counter-revolutionary movement of this period in the Middle East, and one of the British-based Globalists' most important strategic assets today (I) ...

Recall that, in the first post in this series, the Late Benazir Bhutto herself spoke out against American meddling in Pakistani politics. Most everyone in the Middle East and the Muslim world is aware of the extent of our intervention in their societies. The only folks that are in the dark are We the People who continue to support these policies that ultimately provide aid and comfort to our enemies, and attack enlightened men such as Ron Paul who attempt to tell the whole story.

The work continues:

The Muslim Brotherhood emerged out of Egypt in 1928 to evolve into "the largest and most influential Sunni revivalist organization in the 20th century." It was founded by Hasan al-Banna, the first son of a respected sheik who was also an author and the leader of a local mosque. Hasan was born in 1906 and was brought up immersed in Islam under his father's tutelage. He memorized the Koran and at age twelve he founded an organization called the Society For Moral Behavior. Shortly after he created another group, the Society for Impeding the Forbidden. He was a devout Muslim dedicated to his faith and at age sixteen he enrolled in an Islamic school in Cairo to train to become a teacher. As a teenager Hasan al-Banna also became a member of a Sufi order, the Hasafiyya Brothers' order. He was active in the order, reading all of the Sufi literature he could get his hands on, and he organized a Sufi group, the Hasafiyya Society for Welfare. (1)

In Part One of this study we related several allegations that the Muslim Brotherhood was created, infiltrated, or at least promoted by British Intelligence and/or British Freemasonry. Dr. John Coleman alleges that it was created by "the great names of British Middle East intelligence...", Stephen Dorril writes that the Brotherhood was linked to British Intelligence through dame Freya Stark prior to World War II, and the Shah's regime in Iran considered it to be a tool of British Freemasonry (I)...

Hmm.

Once again, we have connections between One Worlders and the Freemasons. Is anyone not surprised that secret societies, such as the Masons, the Trilats, and Bilderburg, would be involved in the formation of a supposedly spontaneous and completely unpredictable wave of terror?

One of these days, we are going to learn that secret societies have no place in a free society, because knowledge is the right of all people.

But I digress.

While the history of British involvement in the Middle East is fascinating and very enlightening as to why Muslims deeply resent the West, let's move on and focus on the American connection.




(Dr. Henry Kissinger)




Goodgame writes:

... In 1974 Secretary of State Henry Kissinger submitted National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200) entitled, "Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests." The conclusion:

"World population growth is widely recognized within the Government as a current danger of the highest magnitude calling for urgent measures.... There is a major risk of severe damage [from continued rapid population growth] to world economic, political, and ecological systems and, as these systems begin to fail, to our humanitarian values."

NSSM 200 was to have been made public in 1979, but it was successfully kept under wraps until 1989. During his career Kissinger made sure that population control remained a cornerstone of his foreign policy strategy, and after him his ideological partner Zbigniew Brzezinski pushed the same agenda in the Carter administration. Both are closely connected with the Rockefeller family, and both had studied under Harvard's William Yandell Elliott, the Oxford-trained British-allied professor.

The WorldWatch Institute was created in 1974, during the same time that NSSM 200 was being promoted in America's foreign policy establishment, with a grant from the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. Since 1984 its annual "State of the World" publication is always highlighted by the media, and its hundreds of alarmist pseudo-scientific papers and reports have been used as ammunition in the leftist and elitist war against industrialization ever since.

As we related in Part One of this study, the first attack on the Third World came in the form of a premeditated massive rise in oil prices in connection with the Yom Kippur war of 1973. Economies cannot develop without an energy supply, and the quadrupling of energy prices was a major setback to nations like India, Brazil, Pakistan, Indonesia and Mexico. Then when President Bhutto of Pakistan tried to work around the situation by developing nuclear energy Kissinger threatened him saying, "We will make an example of you!" (9) The Shah of Iran, even though his nation had an abundant supply of oil, also began a program to develop nuclear energy. Both leaders were quickly eliminated.

With the rise in energy prices the development of the Third World was checked, but the Arab Middle East became greatly enriched. This was when the Globalists turned to their allies, the Islamists, to remedy the situation. Islam would be used to attack industrialization and modernization using the lie that human progress was un-Islamic and a Western plot against the servants of Allah. The real plot was actually aimed at the brown-skinned masses of the Middle East who were briefly experiencing a positive change in their quality of life in terms of education, employment, shelter, sanitation and nutrition. However the religious and intellectual advocates of ignorance, filth and violence joined forces to throw the prosperous Middle East back into the dark ages (II) ...

There is so much damning material here, I could easily write several other posts concerning all of the major figures highlighted in this passage. In the interests of time, however, I would ask you to click on the links and read the information contained therein.

One thing is clear. At the highest levels of the American government, the attack dogs of Radical Islam were used to stifle progress in the Middle East, among other unsavory objectives. The Mighty Jihad Watch blog often questions why secular forces gain little support in the quest to defang the Jihadis, even though there are plenty of groups out there trying to do just that, such as certain segments within the United Nations. They also marvel at the seemingly irrational response to the terrorist threat that nations such as Britain and the U.S. have displayed thus far.

Why are these governments turning a blind eye to the Dhimmnification of the West?

The answer to this question should now be obvious. Eliminating the threat of radical Islam, and getting out of the way of the People so they can do their part to defend Western civilization and values, is simply not high on the "to-do list" of powerbrokers here in the West.


The benefits of a neverending "War on Terror" are simply too lucrative. Using Islamo-fascism to stunt the growth of would be competitors is too powerful a tool to give up. The opportunities to exploit the fears of the People in order to bolster State power are too compelling. And I'm sure that there is a dash of Political Correctness or even outright fear that prevents some from speaking out freely.

The fact of the matter is that radical Islam and Western governments have been strange bedfellows for a significant period of time as further evidence, which will be presented next time, will reveal.

By the way, those who want to read more about Trilateral Commission founder Zbigniew Brzezinski's thoughts on Islamic Jihad can go here. Interesting stuff.

Togakure out.