Fresh after the New Hampshire Primary, thoughts political have been running all through my head!
You know, things like voter fraud, taking control of Congress from crooked politicians and...
Not too long ago, I watched this video...
(Paul vs. Romney)
... and decided to prove definitively that Islamo-fascism is a problem of our own making. The governments of the United States and Britain funded fanatical streams of Islamic theology, supported and removed Muslim leaders according to their fancy, and trained and equipped Jihadis to fight in proxy wars against regimes hostile to Western interests.
Here's a major hint: O.I.L.
Fighting Islamic Jihad, the Right Way.
While many folks choose to focus on the terrorists themselves (for good reason), the theological shortcomings of Islam (which are many), or the bad behavior of Muslims worldwide (which can be absolutely appalling), the history of Western involvement in the Middle East is hardly ever mentioned.
This is unfortunate, because if we don't understand that our government has (and is) funding groups and governments that may overtly or covertly sponsor terror, then we as a people can't possibly come to the vital consensus that we as a nation will no longer fund, equip, or train any person, organization, or government that has any ties to Islamic terrorism in any form whatever. Without our coin, such groups would find it that much harder to kill and injure our people. Why bankroll the very people that wish to murder us? The only thing terrorists should expect from us is a hot bullet, not a blank check.
We can draw upon Western ideals, such as those enshrined in the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, to sucessfully, lawfully, and constitutionally protect against terrorism at home without abusing the rights and freedoms of the American people.
The Second Amendment states:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The word Militia, is defined in Parker vs. District of Columbia as:
... all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and . . . under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.” 10 U.S.C. § 311.
The statute then distinguishes between the “organized militia,” which consists of
the National Guard and Naval Militia, and the “unorganized militia,” which consists of every member of the militia who is not a member of the National Guard or Naval Militia. Id.
Just as in the 1792 enactment, Congress defined the militia broadly, and, more explicitly than in its founding-era counterpart, Congress provided that a large portion of the militia would remain unorganized. The District has a similar structure for its own militia: “Every able-bodied male citizen resident within the District of Columbia, of the age of 18 years and under the age of 45 years, excepting
. . . idiots, lunatics, common drunkards, vagabonds, paupers, and persons convicted of any infamous crime, shall be enrolled in the militia.” D.C. Code § 49-401.
Tench Coxe, contemporary of the framers of the Constitution wrote:
Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man gainst his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American...[T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.
What all of this means, in my view, is that the governments of this country, State and Federal, should work with the citizens of the nation and call the militia in order to protect the nation from any deranged terrorist plot. The Israelis have a similar program in operation, and the amount of suicide bombings inside Israel has dropped dramatically as a result.
We as Americans need to look to our own constitutional traditions, assemble all able bodied men and women, and charge them with the sacred duty of protecting our homeland from all forms of terror, in accordance to American constitutional law and procedure.
In addition, the Federal government needs to strictly enforce our immigration laws in all cases whatever. The Constitution gives Congress the power to enact laws to deport non citizens who are here illegally, especially immigrants who break the laws and seek to do us harm. Along the same lines, visas and such passes given to foreigners should be issued with common sense, and the security of the country, in mind. In other words, student visas to countries who sponsor terrorism should be scrutinized thoroughly, and rejected if there is even a hint that the applicant has ties to terrorist organizations.
Finally, we need to understand that America fears terror because our culture has lost much of its manly spirit. This is an important point to understand, because our liberties and our Republic require a healthy amount of Thumos in order to function successfully. In my opinion, it is an essential component of our Body Politic. The constitutional Republic needs genuine manliness just as a car needs oil. If there is a lack thereof, expect the engine to lock up and disintegrate into a million pieces.
According to Madison in The Federalist LVII:
... If it be asked, what is to restrain the House of Representatives from making legal discriminations in favor of themselves and a particular class of the society? I answer: the genius of the whole system; the nature of just and constitutional laws; and above all, the vigilant and manly spirit which actuates the people of America, a spirit which nourishes freedom, and in return is nourished by it.
If this spirit shall ever be so far debased as to tolerate a law not obligatory on the legislature, as well as on the people, the people will be prepared to tolerate any thing but liberty.
Sadly, readers of the blog know all too well that the Manly spirit of America is terminally ill, thanks to long and terrible attacks upon it by the deadly viruses of misandry and feminism.
With respect to the loss of Manly fortitude, in a previous post a reader of the anti-terror blog Jihad Watch noted:
The majority White women who a few generations ago used to favor the Albert Einstein, the intellectual man-of-letters type, or the hard working stand-up guy, ala the Michael Landon type in the Little House on the Prairie, now favor the 50-Cent type with entirely predictable consequences.
Islam and the Jihad can not be repulsed in the West because western peoples are simply not fit to live and continuo the legacy of their forbearers. With extremely rare exceptions, most of the Westerns that are worthy of respect and admiration have lived years longer than what is remaining for them to live, i.e. middle aged or older. The quality of western people growing up today, especially girls, does vote most unfavorably for the survivor of the west.
The majority of Western Women have made their choice to follow all the “-isms” and to support them most eagerly with their vote, their money and their time. Many of them take one of two tracks, the unwed teen mother and future baby machine bearing the seed of thugs and misfits or the “Sex in the City” career woman types that play the field until prompted by their biological clock to settle down and have one kid before that relationship ends in divorce or not, the result is the same, selfish amoral offspring that will see the West ruined. This is the source of disagreement between me and most with Jihad Watchers who cast most of the blame on Muslims instead of looking inward. Islam and the Jihad would not have been as much of a threat if Western Societies were not collapsing socially, morally, intellectually, religiously, politically and demographically.
What this poster is speaking to is the fact that Manliness has fled the West for greener pastures. While women are indeed being corrupted by the feminist virus, the fact remains that the men who are in a position to do so stand by and do nothing to uphold social mores that would strengthen the West and allow it to fight the Islamic onslaught.
To see how far we have fallen, compare our cultural inability to die for our civilization and way of life to this speech by the Immortal Patrick Henry:
... If we wish to be free -- if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending -- if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained, we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of Hosts is all that is left us!
... The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable -- and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come!
It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, "Peace! Peace!" -- but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have?
Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!
Is life so dear? Give me death?
Very few political leaders would make such a speech today. It would be unimaginable for such men to believe in a cause strongly enough to make the ultimate sacrifice, something that a motivated solder of Allah has no qualms about doing.
In general, no sane person is willing to die for the European Union, or the Welfare Matriarchal state as it exists today. Polls tell us that men are unwilling to fight and die to preserve a system such as ours, in which fatherhood has been repealed based on circumstantial evidence, and in which fathers are nothing more than revenue streams for man hating government officials.
No, they would be willing to die for God, for their loved ones, for Honor, and most of all, for Liberty. Unfortunately, our own legal, cultural, and religious institutions work hand-in-glove to strip the ideas of Manliness and Honor right out of their very souls, from the very moment they are born into the Fematrix.
In addition, one has to consider the fact that the West exports its Womanly culture to foreign lands, and that many men in the Matriarchal West support feminism with open arms, both signs of a society that (at this point anyway) just isn't MAN enough to defend itself, or resist a powerful, spirited, and fanatical opposition.
In spite of all of this, it will be up to men to somehow find the will and the skills to defend the West from assimilation; because feminists and their leftist allies are mostly silent about the pervasive Jihadist threat.
To briefly summarize then:
In order to successfully resist Islamic domination, we need an approach that:
A) Denies financial, economic and military support to our enemies while maximizing our own economic, financial, military, and political strength
B) Supports and maintains our our own culture, values, and traditions of liberty while destroying the ability of vile ideological hate movements, such as feminism, to cripple our resolve
C) Empowers each and every American citizen to do their duty to defend the Republic in a way that is in harmony with constitutional law and tradition
D) Strongly enforce our immigration and naturalization laws, and...
AVOID UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND UNNECESSARY FOREIGN ENTANGLEMENTS that drain lives, morale, and treasure. The last thing we need in this fight is a haphazard foreign policy adventure biting us in the ass!
Islamic Jihad, Creation of the West.
Visitors to my blog know that I link to several anti-jihad sites such as the aforementioned Jihadwatch, the Inspiring Brussels Journal, and the Thoughtful Fjordman.
I've learned a great deal from these sources, and I do not deny that the threat of Islamic terrorism is real, and that there are Jihadists out there that would like nothing better than to overthrow our Western governments and install uberly repressive Shariah law in its place.
On a spiritual level, I find the religion of Islam to be an inferior system when compared to the beliefs of my ancestral land of Kemet.
Not to say there is nothing good in Islam, as there are good things in all religious systems. There are certain aspects of the religion and the Koran that I agree with. It is a manly religion, which I can certainly appreciate.
However, Islam is ultimately a flawed, misguided, and overly rigid, in short, anything but "the religion of peace."
As an aside, in recent days I find myself having mad daydreams about a massive army of Kemetian descendants marching on Egypt to liberate it from Moslem domination.
** Raises Clenched Black Power Fist in the Air **
After overthrowing the Islamist regime, and a job well done, I would seat myself on the Pharonic throne of Upper and Lower Egypt and rule the Land of Kemet in accordance with the Law of Maat.
And everyone would live happily ever after!!
But, I digress. Please forgive my wild delusions of grandeur.
Given the fact that Muslims enslaved MILLIONS of people in Africa over a period of centuries, I have no desire to submit to the religion of slavery. My ancestors would turn over in their graves if I did something so foolish. I am a FREE man, and I'll be damned if I allow myself to be enslaved mentally in such a fashion.
However, I believe that the vast majority of Anti-Jihad blogs miss a very important point. And some who frequent or write for such sites are so entrenched and immersed in anti-Islamic points of view that they cannot accept the possibility that Western governments created a great deal of the problems we face today. So much so that they dismiss visionaries, such as Presidential candidate Ron Paul, who attempt to get them to examine our involvement in the overall "War on Terror."
Firstly, please watch Dr. Ron Paul defend his position that our foreign policy is a major cause and motivator of terror.
(Paul backing up his positions with evidence.)
Secondly, some of you out there need a crash course on the CIA and the history of our various foreign policy initiatives. Please watch this video entitled U.S. Foreign Policy - Secret Wars of the CIA.
And when you are done with that, be sure to read up on the CIA Family Jewels.
Next up, Representative Paul, the late Benazir Bhutto, and independent Pakistani observers speak out about our backing of military dictators in Muslim lands. This flawed policy of our government will be discussed at length in future posts.
(Paul speaks about supporting dictators in Pakistan.)
(The late Benazir Bhutto agreeing with the good Doctor.)
(Pakistani commentators speaking of American and British involvement in Pakistani politics.)
Historical evidence that proves beyond doubt that Islamic Jihad is a perfect example of our foreign policy gone terribly wrong.
Don't miss it!