Jordan Maxwell: Are you an American Citizen or a US citizen? Part II

Gentlemen and ladies,

I posed this question to you once before, and to be perfectly honest, I cannot even answer my own query with certainty. But all the evidence so far points to a very frightening conclusion:

That we no longer live in a Constitutional Republic, but a corporate Democracy (or worse yet, a Cryptocracy) where Mob Rule and Tyranny (instigated by feminists and other lobbies) is the order of the day.

Instead of natural, Constitutional rights, we have only Congressionally authorized Civil immunities and privileges. Hence, the Congress can pass most any law, even when they do not have the authority to do so. By these actions alone (not to mention Martial Law Presidential Orders such as NSPD 51), Congress is no longer acting according to the constitution, and by definition, we are no longer living UNDER the constitution.


But, as I said before, I could be wrong. Maybe I am, but the question still nags at me.

And so, in order to aid my dear readers (and myself) in finding the answers to this all-important topic, I present to you Maxwell, Occult researcher par excellence.

On this page he shows us two versions of the American flag: one of which I have never seen before:





(The Stars and Stripes, the Military version??)





(What flag is this? Is this the Civil flag of the United States?)




I was of course, quite shocked to learn that for all of my short years, the Military standard of the United States has been the only flag I've ever known.

Being the truthseeker I am, I had to dig deeper.

According to Gemworld.com:

Prior to the 1950's, state republic flags were mostly flown, but when a USA flag was flown it was one of the following:

... 2. Civil Flag First Civil Flag of Peace --intended for peace time usage, denoting civil jurisdiction under the Constitution and common law, has vertical stripes, blue stars on white background--last flown before Civil War**

Maxwell himself relates the testimony of Nathaniel Hawthorn:

... From the loftiest point of its roof, during precisely three and a half hours of each forenoon, floats or droops, in breeze or calm, the banner of the republic; but with the thirteen stripes turned vertically, instead of horizontally, and thus indicating that a civil, and not a military, post of Uncle Sam's government is here established...

In addition, the site USCivilFlags.org has more information to share on this matter.

Ladies and gentlemen, I urge you to visit all the sites linked in this post.

I don't have any final answers at this point; mostly due to my own ignorance. But it is abundantly clear that we are NOT living under a free Republic as we thought initially.

And the only way to change this, in my humble opinion, is to recognize the deception, become educated as to what our rights are as Natural Persons, and DEMAND that the government return to a Constitutional government By, Of, and For the people, that protects the rights and liberties of all people, no matter what the Race, Sex, or Religious creed.

To my gay friends out there:

What you do in your bedroom is your own business. I really don't mind what grown, consenting adults do in private. I will not deny or disparage your rights to associate with whom you choose, or contract (gay "marriage" or civil unions) with whom you want. Because now-a-days, I think that marriage should be a private matter, as it was in the days of old.

On the other hand, being gay gives you no special rights to demand that the rights of others to free speech and such be silenced simply because you don't like what other people have to say. The laws that remove the words "mother" and "father" from the lawbooks, and laws that threaten people with jail time if they speak out against homosexuality, need to stop. You have no right to do such a thing.

Don't get me wrong though:

As a black man, I can relate to how some gay folks feel about these issues. I don't like people who call black folks not nice names. However, equal rights means exactly that; EQUAL rights of all people, not SPECIAL rights for some. It may be a bitter pill, but these are the breaks in a free society.

This understanding is crucial to maintaining a free society, because, in my view, it was Racism and the fear of a free black populace that set events into motion that led to the rights of ALL citizens being DOWNGRADED from Natural rights to Civil rights.

If we do not secure the rights of all Natural, Lawfully native born and naturalized citizens, then we expose ourselves to societal weaknesses that groups such as the feminists and communists have so successfully exploited.

Please remember, feminism did not make its gains because it was an overpowering, widely accepted philosophy. They succeeded by subtle means, and misleading the populace into believing that they stood for liberty and equality, when they actually stand for child-murder, tyranny, and domination.

It's high time that we as a society sealed all of the cracks that our enemies can use against us. Racism was and is such a weakness, and man hatred, in our time, is another.

I cannot stress to you, Dear Reader, the importance of struggling to seal the monster of government BACK into the box of the Constitution where it belongs. For example, I have argued in my Against Flood series that women beat, batter, and abuse as much as men do. However, I am only writing these posts to dispel a common and much believed myth, and I am NOT advocating the expansion of government to somehow "protect" us from women's violence (although if private groups wish to provide assistance, using their own time and money, I have no beef with that).

It should be noted that legal professionals are already advocating such an expansion of government services.

Since men and women abuse roughly equally, then the government has all the ammunition [1][2] it needs to fulfil the Platonic/Marxist/Feminist goal of "liberating" ALL children from their natural parents, something that the State would HAVE NO RIGHT TO DO WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW AND CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS if we lived in a truly free, Constitutional Republic that constrained the powers of government.

I DO NOT want to see the rights of motherhood stripped from women. I believe such a move would be disastrous for all of us. My fear is that after a certain period of time, knowingly and unknowingly, government will seek to extend it's doctrines of Parens Patriae and In Loco Parentis and seize children on their own prerogative, all the while citing the same body of proofs and evidence that I will be presenting in my Against Flood series to justify the kidnapping of children from their families, single parent or otherwise.

Divide and Rule.

In closing then,

My Black's Law Dictionary and I have become fast friends, as I race to put two and two together and make absolutely sure that we are American citizens, as opposed to US citizens who are proxy shareholders in the Corporation of THE UNITED STATES.

If I can answer this question with certainty, then, at long last, we can identify, fight, and defeat the true enemies of freedom.

If it turns out that we are living under a form of government other than the Republican form of government promised to us by the Constitution, then we can make the necessary changes needed to secure our natural rights.

As an example, we could change the Fourteenth Amendment to read:

Section 1. All (natural) persons (regardless of race, sex, or sexual orientation) born or naturalized in (their respective states) and the (u)nited (s)tates,(and whose parents are lawful, sovereign Citizens of their (s)tate and the united states and did not violate any immigration or naturalization laws of the united states), are Citizens of (their state) and of the (united states, with all the natural rights and constitutional protections entitled to them as Citizens of their state and the united states).

No (s)tate (or the united states,) shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the (natural rights,) privileges or immunities of Citizens of (their state and the) (u)nited (s)tates; nor shall any state (or the united states) deprive any person of life, liberty, property, (or any other natural, constitutional right), without due process of law; nor deny to any (natural) person (regardless of race, sex, or sexual orientation) within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

While I am not an attorney, I believe that small changes to the Fourteenth Amendment, as suggested above, would go a long way to resolving our overbearing government problems. In this way, both the States and the united states are equally bound and restrained by the Federal constitution.

But in any event, DON'T TAKE MY WORD FOR ANYTHING. Make sure you do the research for yourself.

Kumo tha Dude.