Wednesday, October 17, 2007

What the F&^K??

Dear Readers,

Here's a little something to make you choke on your drink!!

According to ScienceDaily (Props to my man Joe for the heads up):

Feminism And Romance Go Hand In Hand

Science Daily — Contrary to popular opinion, feminism and romance are not incompatible and feminism may actually improve the quality of heterosexual relationships, according to Laurie Rudman and Julie Phelan, from Rutgers University in the US. Their study* also shows that unflattering feminist stereotypes, that tend to stigmatize feminists as unattractive and sexually unappealing, are unsupported.

It is generally perceived that feminism and romance are in direct conflict. Rudman and Phelan’s work challenges this perception. They carried out both a laboratory survey of 242 American undergraduates and an online survey including 289 older adults, more likely to have had longer relationships and greater life experience. They looked at men’s and women’s perception of their own feminism and its link to relationship health, measured by a combination of overall relationship quality, agreement about gender equality, relationship stability and sexual satisfaction...

First of all...

Feminism? Good for your relationship!?

What kinda Weed are these two FEMALE feminazis smoking?? Must be some of that good shit.


Seriously though... this claim is beyond ridiculous. Any man with any common sense knows that feminist women are to be avoided like the plague, lest something bad, such as a crippling divorce, an overnight stay in Club Fed, or feminine-feminasty domestic violence befall them. I can only think of the lies that the boyfriends of these toxic gals had to tell in order to avoid "domestic violence" from their empowered girlfriends!!

Secondly, it seems that the femmes are losing the culture wars, not to mention the dating and marriage game[1][2], and BADLY. Why the hell else would these two dames author themselves up a report that sounds more like a Harlequin romance novel than a serious scientific study?

I guess, in the sense of fairness, I will read this so-called study someday. But for now, I think it's safe to say that a feminasty babe is good for only one thing:

A late night bootycall that involves three condoms worn at the same time, lots of meaningless sex, possibly some vittles beforehand, and promising to call her sometime as you leave her house before sunrise...

"Sure we're gonna get married baby! Suuuuuuure!"

Anyhoo, give the rest of it a read at your discretion...

And try not to laugh too hard!



tba said...

it seems that the femmes are losing the culture wars, not to mention the dating and marriage game

EXACTLY. the simple fact that they need to defend feminism is proof enough that feminism is waning. going around bashing men and saying all men are rapist can only go so far.

The women are trying to address men because thi study is so focused on the "attractiveness" of feminist women. And which sex cares about attractiveness the most? Men.

It is great that feminism is dying. what we need however is something to replace it, where BOTH MEN AND WOMEN are treated for what they are BY NATURE. No more trying to make women into men and men into women.

Otherwise, if nothing better is replaced "the more things change, the more they stay the same".

Kumogakure said...


I'm thinking that we will move to a "free market" attitude... the next generation will see how feminism is really mucking things up will reject it, and people will assume the roles they choose.

If you think about it, it's not that men have stopped being men.. its that men aren't allowed to BE men, for better or for worse.

It's either get out of the way, or watch our society crumble. Won't be too many choices when our economy and our social fabric gets all streched to hell.

In the end, we'll see things go our way!



Eman said...

A-men to that Kumo! Feminist women should never be given the time of day since they are always so washed up on being anti-family and pro-lesbianism. Take a look at our two current demographics: Gen-X and Gen-Y; neither of the females from the two are considered desirable wives.

Kumogakure said...

"neither of the females from the two are considered desirable wives."


Very few women from these generations are wife material. As a matter of fact, the good girls (I've met a few in my time) are being drowned out by their feminasty sisters.

While these girls are going to pay the price for the actions of their sisters, it can't be helped.

If you want young, want pretty, and want wifely... Overseas is the ONLY way to go. Trying to find the Western good girls is like trying to find that needle in the minefield... not worth the time, trouble, or risk.

Fem nags are good for a quick lay, but nothing more than that.

Happy Bullet said...

This study was one of the more blatant pieces of feminist propaganda I've seen in a while.

For starters, a quick web search of the two authors reveals interest in feminism.

Second of all, the journal it was published in (some feminists have been going on about it being a peer reviewed journal) is described as such:

Sex Roles: An interdisciplinary, behavioral science journal with a feminist perspective

Third of all, considering that it was a college and online study conducted by feminist researchers to appear in a feminist journal, what is the bet it was advertised primarily to um.. feminists? Pretty good odds there.

Finally, one of the Authors Laurie Rudman authored an earlier paper on a similar subject:

Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2007). The F Word: Is feminism incompatible with beauty and romance? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 125-136.

ABSTRACT: Three studies examined the predictive utility of heterosexual relationship concerns vis-à-vis support for feminism. Study 1 showed that beauty is perceived to be at odds with feminism, for both genders. The stereotype that feminists are unattractive was robust, but fully accounted for by romance-related attributions. Moreover, more attractive female participants (using self-ratings) showed decreased feminist orientations, compared with less attractive counterparts. Study 2 compared romantic conflict with the lesbian feminist stereotype and found more support for romantic conflict as a negative predictor of support for feminism and women's civil rights. Study 3 showed that beliefs about an incompatibility between feminism and sexual harmony negatively predicted support for feminism and women's civil rights. In concert, the findings indicate that a marriage between research on romantic relationships and the factors underlying sexism is overdue for understanding gender inequities.

Ho ho. If they believe the current study, then they'd have to also believe that feminists of both genders are generally unattractive. I think we can safely lead them to their ugly, fat love or whatever it is those freaks do that make each other so happy.. LOL :)

One last thing, anyone who is listening vote Angry Harry in the blogger's choice awards!

Kumogakure said...


Long time no hear from. How's it going buddy??

Thanks for the breakdown of said feminist hallucination. Unfortunately, its come to the point where one must carefully analyze EVERYTHING he sees or reads, especially when relationships are concerned.

Men on the street know the truth... feminism and feminists are the least desirable human beings on this good green Earth.

Take care of yourself man!