Friday, October 26, 2007

Taken into Custody part II

Gang,

Courtesy of the Noble Daddyblogger, an interview with Baskerville, author of the weighty tome Taken into Custody.

I have to tell you folks... I have been reading this book, and it has been the most emotionally disturbing experience I've ever had. I'm man enough to admit to you that I am afraid.

Not just for me of course, but I am afraid for you, my family, my friends... anyone who happens to make the foolish mistake of getting married in this feminist, matriarchal, socialism nation formerly known as America.

I do intend on wrapping up my Day in the Life series, otherwise known as how to meet, marry, and bring home the foreign wife of your dreams.

But I gotta tell you:

AFTER READING THIS BOOK, I CANNOT, IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM, RECOMMEND ANYONE GETTING OR STAYING MARRIED IN THIS COUNTRY FOR ANY REASON. NOT NOW, NOT EVER, NO MATTER IF THEY ARE AMERICAN OR NOT.

If you get married here in the West, my friend, you are FUCKED. That's all there is to it.

Don't you dare get married, but by all means pick up the book, Taken into Custody.

And be sure to listen to the interview that the Good Daddyblogger has so kindly posted to his spot.

Aiight?

Kumo out.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Finaly. Someone else who get's it. I have been saying the very same thing for a long time. Forget about bringing a foreign female here. You will be just a screwed by the system.

In fact you will be more screwed once your foreign bride realizes all the legal power she has over you. Power she never had before which makes them even more insane than an American female.

I have also been saying that IMBRA is inadvertently a good thing for American men. It was never meant to be but it is. But don't try telling that to the crybaby's over at Mens News Daily. Let them learn that the hard way.

Kirigakure said...

"Finaly. Someone else who get's it. I have been saying the very same thing for a long time. Forget about bringing a foreign female here. You will be just a screwed by the system.

In fact you will be more screwed once your foreign bride realizes all the legal power she has over you."

I was more of the persuasion that it is better to marry overseas and stay there before I picked up Taken in Custody... and I am especially convinced now.

If a man doesn't do his homework (described in previous postings under A Day in the Life), and he brings the wrong woman home, he's toast, and that's the way it is.

I knew the system was horrible, and I knew it was dangerous and all that... but Baskerville's book lays it all out in living color.

If a man can avoid getting married, he should do so at all costs, no matter where the girl might be from.

And while I still believe (and the numbers tend to prove it) that marriage to a foreign woman is much less risky, it would be pretty damn foolish for me to sit here and lead people to believe that everything is all rosy.

Marriage is dead, and the sooner it dies (or the corrupt family courts are disbarred, which will happen in the year never), the better off Men will be.

That's real.

Kumo.

Anonymous said...

Speaking of the wankers that populate Mens News Daily, the real Grand Poobah Whack-job author over there is David R. Usher.

He regularly publishes variations on his thesis that MARRIAGE is what will advance the men's movement!

I don't know what kool-aid Mr. Usher has been drinking, but his views are so lofty and above rebuke that he only posts on MND with "comments closed" so that no one can take issue with him publicly.

Anonymous said...

PS -- Usher posted a reader's review of Baskerville's book on amazon.com (just follow the link above), in which he argues -

"Marriage-absence is the greatest social and economic problem America faces. Those who do not understand this fact, and how the system presently works, need this book to help formulate policy answers we can all agree on to make a better life for all Americans."

What I've always found fascinating about Usher's ideology is that men only show up as wallets and wage-slaves.

In essence, he wants men to become permanently indentured domestic servants, in order to eliminate the remaining fragile social safety net of so-called "entitlements."

Under Usher's plan, marriage becomes a life sentence with no escape.

Of course, you cannot debate these issues with him, because he refuses to permit any probing of his illogic.

Kirigakure said...

Anon,

Let it be said that I have nothing but the utmost respect for Usher. I have learned a great deal from him, and he has done much in the cause of men's rights.

While I agree with him in principle that marriage (monogamous or polygamous) is the best way to organize a society, I personally cannot recommend marriage right now (unless you plan on living in a man/family friendly legal environment).

It is simply too dangerous for a man to do so. Once all of these idiotic anti male/feminist friendly laws are repealed forever and ever, then yes, I would recommend marriage to anyone who would listen.

However, as I see it, a man has three ways to go on this:

Marriage
Celibacy
Bachelorhood

and none is superior to the other, in my view. But as the laws stand, it is too dangerous to enter into government licensed/controlled "legal" wedlock.

Since I'm on my "legal research" kick, I've found (religiously and legally) that civil marriage is NOT the way to go.

More on this later.

Kumo.

Kirigakure said...

Correction:

"and none is superior to the other, in my view."

Let me rephrase that. While I prefer marriage as good social policy, I also believe that a man has the natural right to forego marriage, or remain a bachelor.

To each his own, and in a truly free society, every man could make the choice best suited to his nature.

Anonymous said...

David R. Usher is biggest mangina of them all over at MND. You are not allowed to disagree with him.

When he got shot down repeatedly by Elder George for trying to save marriage when it was not worth saving he threw a temper tantrum and closed all of his comments from then on.

He is exactly the type of MRA that has signed the marriage contract despite all of the warnings and now demands the rest of us join his movement and lobby congress for new laws all in order to save him from the ass raping in divorce court that he will be getting.

Why should we bother with all of that? Men don't need marriage to survive. A country that hates it's most productive element does not want to survive.

So let those parasites, that plague of locust, the family court system, starve to death without men to feed on financialy.

Until then just go your own way, do your own thing and be your own movement.

Anonymous said...

Men don't need marriage to survive. A country that hates it's most productive element does not want to survive.

Bingo, my friend. That a few MRAs put out marriage is the cure-all to our social ills is ridiculous. Marriage is worthless in a society that doesn't respect men--and NO, that doesn't ONLY mean the feminists, the socialist government, the divorce lawyers, etc. and bogey-men of the Democratic Party, it ALSO means the corporate robber baron$ and Marriage Mandating Priests of Suburban Churches that treat men like chattel property. If commerce, government, churches, and every major institution treats men like dirt, then men owe these institutions NOTHING but scorn and derision.

Kirigakure said...

"Men don't need marriage to survive. A country that hates it's most productive element does not want to survive."

Agreed. This whole blame-the-men deal only makes sense if we remember that men tend to be the best, brightest, and most productive of society.

And of course, this means that our opponents are literally willing to kill the golden goose in order to squeeze a little blood from the turnip.

However, I believe that our enemies (as Jaded Guy, nice post btw, pointed out in detail) seek the destruction of the family unit because they know that a strong married, united family with Right Guidance (which in 8 times out of 10 is going to be of the Male Headship variety) can fight the power grabs and the tyranny that we are currently facing.

How can men as a group fight the power when many are worried about how they are gonna scrape enough money together to make that child support payment, or whatever their situation may be?

The problems we are experiencing are NOT accidental. They are purposeful, and have been in the works for centuries.

"So let those parasites, that plague of locust, the family court system, starve to death without men to feed on financialy.

Until then just go your own way, do your own thing and be your own movement."

Solid advice. However, we have to keep in mind that these abuses that we see in the area of family law are just the symptoms of a larger sickness. Even if we don't marry, one of these days, we will still find ourselves living in a fascist state, unless and until we get the word out.

And alliances in this thing are crucial. So I don't disparage Usher for recommending what he does, but I would add that the problems we face are a lot bigger than the issue of Civil Marriages.

"If commerce, government, churches, and every major institution treats men like dirt, then men owe these institutions NOTHING but scorn and derision."

Good point here Jaded. While the leaders of these orgs may thing shit is all good... someday the Child Support Enforcement team will come for THEM.

Some people just have to learn the hard way, when the shit hits the fan.

Good stuff gents.