Dear readers,
Sorry I've kept you. I've been studying like madd, trying to elevate my mind in these wild and crazy times.
Now here is a series that is ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY a must watch. This may be the most important film you ever see.
Constitution Class is in session.
Educate thyself, and after that, educate thy friends and loved ones.
As the speaker says, how can we fight for our rights, if we don't know what our rights are?
Kumo Madison.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/silver/t24_ag_en_usoz_2.gif)
![[Most Recent Exchange Rate from www.kitco.com]](http://www.weblinks247.com/exrate/24hr-jpy-small.gif)
4 comments:
Good find, Kumo. This is indeed essential.
There just needed to be an eighth Class reflecting on the implementation of the pussy pass.
Faustus,
If there was any flaw to the Fathers, it was the lack of an established household order, i.e. a "Head of Household" function.
In our modern times, this role should be agreed to, in advance and in writing, without duress, before a marriage takes place and a household gets set up.
While the majority of the Heads of Households would be undoubtedly male, I also recognize that there are some dominant female types that will seek out this role.
See...
http://www.ccel.us/missingfromaction.ch4.html
As long as there was a Head of Household concept, in which the Husband was the traditionally legal head of the family, the government could not play one member of the family against another. A family could stand united in the face of government tyranny.
For example, if your wife allowed the police to come in your house without probable cause (if there is no legitimate reason to suspect criminal activity), over your objections, such entry by the police would be void in court cases, for example. The amendment against illegal searches would be much more robust.
The way it is now, unless people live truly alone and by themselves, it's hard to see how a truly constitutional concept can function, as the government could easily sow dissension in any given group, and intimidate it to give up it's natural protections.
I think the question of authority in the home (for example, the Confucian model) needs to be addressed before we can see a widespread return to truly constitutional principles... but that's just my humble opinion.
Kumo.
good luck on that one, Kumo. women are ready to abolish the title of feminism but they sure aren't ready to get rid of the BENEFITS of feminism.
Before we can even THINK about tackle the question of the head of the household we need to DISASSOCIATE patriarchy with subjugation. Right now, in the female psyche (and with many men too) patriarchy is synonymous with oppression. Whatever insults we can hoist on feminism, one thing is for certain- they hvae done a BRILLIANT job in getting women to believe that before feminism women were oppressed BECAUSE of the patriarchy, i.e. man as head of the household.
Heck they've been SO SUCCESSFUL that even the CHURCHES are afraid to speak the biblical role of man as head of the houlsehold.
Women will have to discover FOR THEMSELVES that allowing men to be head of the house and NOT FIGHTING WITH THEM is actually BENEFITIAL for them and their marriages. I even saw an article about that the other day where women were finding relief in "surrendering" to their husbands.
"Women will have to discover FOR THEMSELVES that allowing men to be head of the house and NOT FIGHTING WITH THEM is actually BENEFITIAL for them and their marriages."
Bingo!
That's why I'm all about the Male Leadership. But I have to also acknowledge that not every couple is gonna go that route, and I think that there is enough room under a true constitutional republican government for people to choose for themselves what they wanna do.
But I honestly think that in their heart of hearts, 75% or more of women would rather their husband be the "last word" and take charge of things. I've read (and experienced) this enough to know it to be true.
But yes, women have been brainwashed, by elite men and their feminist slavegirls.
Regular Janes aren't going to recognize the trap until either society collapses and women no longer have big daddy government to take care of them, or the gov decides to separate them from their children aka the Republic, or men and women both lose what little freedom we have left and become out and out slaves.
At some point, we as a people are going to realize we have been fucking up majorly, and we are gonna have THE TALK about how things are going to go down.
Feminism won't last forever. It might not even last the decade, cause even the Marxists are fearful of a fascist take over.
And who will defend the Marxist women when the slavemasters come calling?
Post a Comment