Sex, Sensibility, and Real Street Stories.

Greetings Sports fans!

I hope that everyone is doing well. As usual, I have a lot to say, so let's get to it!




Black Single Mothers: Public Enemy Number One.



Before I speak my mind, let's take minute to listen to Sarge WP's comments on the subject.





It ain't no secret that the black American family in America has been completely destroyed [1][2][3]. While some of you might think that I am overreacting, I'm quite serious when I state that the black American family unit is dead and buried, never to return.

What else can be said when 70% of a people's children are born outside of marriage?

As Sarge explains in the Youtube vid, cultural norms (or lack thereof) are passed on from parent to child. In most societies, the basic family pattern consists of the father, his wife (or wives), and his children. The ideal feminist Matriarchal family [4][5] unit consisting of mothers and children only, is extremely rare and politically, culturally, and economically inferior when compared to families where fathers are present and involved in the lives of their children. History has proven that societies where marriage (and married fathers) is the norm far surpass those that have a weak marriage culture whenever the two come into close contact.

The mightiest and most prosperous civilizations always had strong marriage cultures, and vigorous male involvement in all aspects of civil, religious, and family life.

There is documented evidence that pre-historical African civilizations were strongly matriarchal (see Massey), in terms of lineage, theology, and political structure. And while many African cultures (certainly not all, as Africa is a huge continent with many religious and cultural variables) maintain the trappings of Matriarchy, one would be hard pressed to find the idealized feminist family unit consisting of solely mothers and their offspring; and marriage as an institution is the [6][7][8] dominant form of family organization throughout Africa and the rest of the world.




(Traditional South African Wedding)




(Traditional Village Wedding)





It should be understood that the African woman has always held a place of honor and wields considerable influence in family affairs (Some have suggested that this cultural trait has been leveraged by feminists in modern times for maximum destructive effect, a plausible idea as feminists just love to exploit a society's norms or shortcomings in order to achieve their goals).

However some feminists and other misguided commentators have ignorantly argued that the American social paradigm, in which black women bear and raise the vast majority of children outside of wedlock, and use the power of the State, and the court of Anti-Male public opinion to push fathers out of their children's lives, is nothing more than an "expression of holistic, natural, and traditional African culture" or some other pretentious claim.


To that idea I say... BULLSHIT. The social structure of 2008 America, that has been fueled by feminism and welfarism, is in complete and utter disharmony with the traditional and modern African mind.

Sadly, many in the black community, thanks to a incompetent and corrupt black elite, pro-feminist propaganda in the popular media, and the traditional expectation that the black woman wears the pants in any given situation, have come to believe that having a 70% out-of-wedlock birth rate is right and natural; nevermind that some of the most powerful blacks in America are married and live a lifestyle that the average 'Hood dweller would never even imagine is possible. And, worst of all, these highly successful people not only denounce black men as a group for their "irresponsibility" and their failure "to do tha right thing", they also do absolutely nothing to combat the prevailing attitude amongst the black masses that "marriage is for white people."

In my humble opinion, the whole situation smacks of one rule for me, and another for thee!


Now with all that said, let me tell you a story about what black single mothers, drenched in the toxic waste of black feminism, high on Misandry, and backed up by the full force of the State, teach their daughters on a daily basis. Hopefully, by the end of this morality play, you will understand and take heed when I say that dating single mothers, divorced women, or the children of said women is an absolute No No! Women like these have, more often than not, been taught from an early age to hate men and make their lives miserable.

And with the full power of the State at their command, they can make your life very miserable indeed.

Marriage to such a woman will most likely turn out to be a complete MISSION FAILURE...



It was a quiet day at the office, and Toku was putting the finishing touches on his Spending Projections Excel spreadsheet.

The door suddenly opened, and Renee swept into the office, with her six year old daughter in tow.

Toku, having had his fair share of negative experiences with children that have no respect for men, or no home training to speak of, focused on his work and shut them out of his mind completely as Renee introduced her child to the other women in the office.

While making nice-nice and receiving candy and presents from the office ladies, one co-worker, a devout Christian police officer and mother of five kids, spoke to the child in a conspiratorial whisper:

"Here's some candy for you... just for little girls. If a boy tried to get some candy from me, I'd arrest him! But it's ok for you because we don't arrest little girls, only boys..."

After more pleasantries (and treats) were exchanged, Renee came to my desk and spoke those dreaded words...

Renee:

"Say Hi to Toku Mikailah!"

Me:

"Hi Mikailah, how are you?"

Mikailah:

"Get away from me! I don't like stupid boys!!!"

Me, thinking to myself:

** Sigh ** Another child of a single mother who has no respect for her elders, who will grow up hating men for the rest of her life, will probably get pregnant and become a statistic before she graduates high school, and will most likely drag whatever man is stupid enough to impregnate her through the child support court for the remainder of his working life.

Never fails!


Renee: (Complete silence. No reprimand or apology for allowing her daughter to talk to a 30 year old man like I just graduated from kindergarten the day before yesterday.)

After a few uncomfortable moments of silence, I turned back to my work and pretended that the exchange never happened. All the women in the office grinned and were very pleased that Mikailah put another damnable man in his subserviant place. You go girl!!

Renee, remembering that she had a child support hearing to attend at 2:30, starts out of the door.

Renee:

"Say bye to everyone!"

Child: Taking a last glance at all the women in the office and ignoring my existence:

"Bye!!"

All co-workers except me: "BYE Honey! Good luck with your hearing! I hope your no-good bastard of an ex-husband gets his ass locked up this time!"

Renee and child smiling and utterly content, walked out of the office.

Toku saved his completed worksheet, and contemplated the difficulties that lie ahead for both Renee and her daughter...


Please note, Dear Reader, that this is based on my real life experiences, for what it's worth.

Because I work with an office full of women, I hear EVERYTHING. The level of Misandry is unbelievable, but it is especially bad when the divorced single mothers open their mouths to spew their hatred against men, which happens a lot.

When it comes to what they teach their children about men... think of Parental Alienation Syndrome on steroids!

Sadly, the real losers in all this are the daughters of single mothers. Every one I have ever met showed nothing but disrespect and contempt for men; much of it learned from their parental unit. They are taught, from an early age, not to marry, not to show respect towards elder men, not to believe that a man could ever do anything good, or that a man could hold their best interests at heart.

Nor are they taught how to distinguish the good guys from the bad boy thugs. All men are equally bad in their eyes; and so they learn too late that there is a difference. Or, they mistake or mistrust a man's kindness, so they equate kindness with weakness and torture the poor schmoe in a multitude of ways.

In other words, the wellspring of acceptance, compassion, and kindness, that every child starts out with, is poisoned to the point where hostility towards men and marriage becomes second nature.

And because of this training, many black women grow up fearful and hostile towards men. They shun marriage and traditional family values; and are utterly toxic on a mental, physical, and spiritual level. Not to say that all women are like this of course, but I would be comfortable in asserting that 80% of the population are not worth dealing with, and are best avoided by men seeking a loving lifelong companion.

Just in case you want a second opinion, please listen as this gentlemen explains that this toxic attitude is one of the biggest reasons why black men avoid black women.





Again, I must stress that women of African extraction are not inherently evil. Far from it. Those of you who have been with black women born and raised OUTSIDE OF THIS COUNTRY know what I'm talking about.

And I'm not saying that 100% of black American women are rude and uncouth. There ARE good black women out there. But like I've said before, 80% of black American women are simply not pleasant to be around... much less mate, marry, and raise children with. As a matter of fact, the wrong woman is definitely hazardous to your health.

The main issue here is that post feminist black American women have been taught, from childhood, to be totally unpleasant at best, and downright violent at worst. And keep in mind that her cultural conditioning is accepted and encouraged by both law and custom. So-called black leaders, such as Cosby, Obama, and others, aid and abet this bad behavior. And woe be unto the innocent man who attempts to change her... restraining orders and domestic violence charges await the foolish one who dares to resist her tyranny, right, wrong, or indifferent.

So, to bring the point home...

a) The death of the American black family has created a vacuum

b) The new cultural norm is single parenthood for black women (aided, abetted, and subsidized by Fedgov and other government entities)

c) The daughters of single mothers are, from an early age, instilled with an attitude of misandry and hostility against marriage

d) Which leads to the continuation of the cycle of out of wedlock childbirth in the black community

e) Which impoverishes and weakens the black American community as a whole leading to more crime, more poverty, and more dependence on government and so-called leaders who are setting up their followers for even greater failure and misery.

Although there are many brave souls who are challenging this vicious circle, one wonders how successful they will be in raising the consciousnesses of the people. And so, you, Dear Reader, should take responsibility to change this situation in your own life, and follow a two pronged plan for effecting mass change.

Unless or until cultural attitudes and laws are reformed to protect and uphold the rights and responsibilities of men, the best thing guys of all races can do to protect themselves is to not meet, mate with, or marry Westernized, feminized women, of any color, and actively encourage their male peers to follow their example.

Blog, write, record Youtube videos, rap songs or poems... do whatever you gotta do to get the word out.

Once this is done, then you can activate the second part of the plan. Since the Awakened man understands that there is a whole wide world of women that are traditionally minded, incredibly kind, in great physical condition, and are more than happy to spend quality time with him, he will then devote his time and energy to seeking out these women instead of setting himself up for failure trying to force American women to change their ways, or even worse, sacrificing himself on the alter of Misandry in a vain attempt to earn their respect and their devotion.

Ultimately, you can't control what women do... but you can always control what you do. You have all the powers of Creation at your command, and you can always choose to Go Your Own Way.

Those who understand this power would change up the familiar saying of "Out of Sight, Out of Mind" to "Out of Mind, Out of Sight." As soon as you decide to honor the request of today's Western woman by staying as far away from her as possible, and choosing to seek out companionship in greener pastures, you are already well on your way.

I know that this can work for you, because it worked for me... big time.

And while obstacles, such as the unconstitutional IMBRA law, seek to keep American men alone and unhappy, there are ways to circumvent such petty regulations in order to find the woman of your dreams.

Or, if you are so inclined, you can travel to exotic destinations and rent the services of a professional until your heart is content.

There is happiness to be found in this world... but the only way you can be successful is to do the correct things, and commit yourself to the right people. And those who KNOW what is right, have to do what is right; even when it is difficult or unpleasant, even if 80% of the world is completely dead set against it.

And from where I'm sitting, marriage and relationships with thoroughly Feminized women, of any color or creed, will not lead to success... only to pain and hardship.

Take heed.




Togakure School: A Day in the Life.



Here at Togakure School, we tend to stick to the hard facts, and shy away from using our life experiences to support our ideals. However, I wanted to take a time out for a minute in order to share this bit of everyday life with you.

As I was driving home from a hard day's work, I began to catalog a list of items I would need for various projects. If my speculations paid off, myself, wife, and cub would be in a very comfortable position in the face of looming economic hard times.

Two new laptops, a 500GB hard drive, a Nintendo Wii...

You get the idea.

So, I says to myself, the quickest way to raise the needed cash would be to get a part time job and earn the money (as I've adopted a cash vs. credit purchase policy). I figured I could work a few months, get all the equipment I needed, and quit shortly thereafter.

Good plan, I said to myself.


As I walked in my front door, I saw my wife sitting in a classical Seiza pose, as Japanese girls often do. She uttered words of welcome, accompanied by a deep bow. I returned her bow, took off my shoes at the door, sat down cross-legged beside her, and informed her of my intention to find part time work.

My wife, being the kind hearted woman she is, was appalled.

An extra job? Didn't I work long hours already? she asked.

I did indeed, I replied. However, in order to complete my projects (and boost our income) in a timely manner, I would need to finance the needed items. I told her that this would be the best way to do so without resorting to credit.

My young wife would not hear of it. What if I became ill from overwork? There must be a better way.

After much discussion, it was determined that she would work additional hours at her part time job, instead of only working one day a week.

I protested, as I worried about her health and the well being of our unborn child.

You should rest, I told her. But, being Japanese, she politely refused to listen. I asked her repeatedly was she sure this was what she wanted to do. I searched her face (a must when communicating with Asian women, as the eyes never lie) for signs that she was only being polite in her offer to increase her scheduled working hours.

Finally, I was assured that she was sincere when she said that I shouldn't worry about getting a part time job.

The conversation concluded, she rose from her seated position and went into the kitchen to prepare dinner from scratch. I went into the bathroom in order to prepare my nightly bath, as I pondered the feasibility of my plans for world conquest...

So what's yer point? you ask.

The moral here, Dear Reader, is manifold:

a) There are women in the world who love, respect, and appreciate their men enough to support him in a cheerful and loving manner.

b) There are women in the world who think of others instead of thinking only about themselves and their own comfort.

c) There are women in the world who understand that the man that loved them enough to marry them usually has their best interests at heart.

d) There are women in the world who fit the definition of the words wife and helpmate.

American women, in their mad dash to destroy Patriarchy in particular and men in general, have lost sight of the fact that a man, if properly appreciated and encouraged, will move heaven and earth to provide for her and her offspring in a manner that no other institution, such as Fedgov, or the local domestic violence shelter, could ever hope to match.

And as a consequence: Man, woman, child and society are much better off.

By sharing with you a bit of my personal life, I want to convey to my readers the happiness, warmth, kindness and loyalty that the cultivated man and the well groomed woman bring to the table.

Most of all, I want men to know that the woman of their dreams does exist. But unfortunately, thanks to insane feminist brainwashing, the man who seeks a lifelong mate will need to travel far in order to meet her. Women of my wife's caliber are incredibly few and far between in the Feminized West. If you should have such a woman on your team, be sure to take the time to appreciate her.

A real woman is a treasure indeed. Good luck gents, and good hunting!




Polygyny and why it's good for you!



Speaking of wives... Men over the centuries have discovered that sometimes, two (or more) wives are better than one.


An African proverb states:

To have one wife is to be one-eyed.

While I've explained, in detail, my reasons for supporting the ancient practice of Polygyny elsewhere, I do want to take a few moments and share some additional information with you, my Valuable Reader.





(One of the fringe benefits of multiple wives...)





From the National Business Review:

Polygamy key to long life
NBR Staff | Friday August 22 2008 - 03:57pm

New research suggests men from polygamous cultures outlive those from monogamous ones by 12 percent on average, according to a report from New Scientist.

Ecologist Virpi Lummaa from the University of Sheffield, UK, studied men aged 60+ from 189 countries on a monogamy scale of one to four – from totally monogamous to mostly polygamous for her research, presented to the International Society for Behavioral Ecology’s annual meeting in New York.

Lummaa and colleague Andy Russell also removed a country’s gross domestic product and average income to try and weed out the effects of better diet and healthcare from monogamous Western states.

Lummaa took pains to emphasise that their monogamy score is “a crude first stab”, and said they are trying to find different ways to assess marriage patterns – so their conclusions may change with further analysis.

It’s possible men who father children in the 60’s and 70’s take better care of themselves because of their dependents, conversely evolutionary forces may select for longer-lived men in polygamous cultures, according to the report.

Chris Wilson, an evolutionary anthropologist from Cornell University in New York who attended the talk said to New Scientist, "It's a valid hypothesis and good prediction."

He added that enjoying the loving attention of several wives who depend on their aging husband’s position in a social hierarchy may be the best explanation.

"It doesn't surprise me that men in those societies live longer than men in monogamous societies, where they become widowed and have nobody to care for them."

Interesting indeed.

We already know that marriage increases a man's lifespan, and we also know that sexual activity is essential for good mental and physical well-being, in addition to the biological importance of regular sexual activity for men in general.

So then, is a man more likely to have frequent "relations" in the confines of a monogamous or a polygamous marriage? The jury seems to be out on this question, but, as I argued previously, there may be a time in a married relationship when the wife is unable or unwilling to meet the man's very real sexual desires. In that case then, is a man justified if he takes another wife or concubine? And more importantly, should society punish a man who takes a mistress, another wife, or a concubine in his hour of need?

If we look at history, tradition, and religion, cultures across space and time have answered that it is permissible to take additional wives, and no, men should not be punished in draconian fashion for doing so. But in modern day America, the polygamous option, which has benefits (and drawbacks) for both men and women, has been forbidden by Supreme Court fiat.

Now isn't it strange, Dear Reader, that the right of men to take more than one wife, and to even be a part of monogamous married life, has been stripped away by the same corrupt institution?

Have not the Courts, who have ruled that Men are subject to child support slave labor, also decided that adults cannot choose to freely enter into polygamous unions?

Does anyone else see a pattern here?

In my opinion, if legal age, consenting adults wish to enter into polygamous unions, then it is their right to do so, although I do support limits to the practice for the sake of social harmony.

After all, Three's Company, four is a crowd!

In any event, I don't claim that polygamy, as a system, is superior to monogamy or celibacy. What I am saying however, is that for certain individuals, it can be the right lifestyle choice, and to prevent free people from exercising their rights by government decree is just as bad as when the rights of men are stripped away from them by the ignorant majority.

For me, in the final analysis, it's the principle of freedom coupled with responsibility that matters.


Togakure sez...


Be sure to check back next time as we discuss Rugged Men, womanly women, and why being a Punk is bad for your social life!

Peace.

Sex and Sensibility.

Please view the video for a preview of today's subject matter...








First Things First.



Before I express my thoughts on everyone's favorite extra-curricular activity, I'd like to briefly mention that YOUR House of Representatives voted in favor of the most useless bailout in history.

(But I'm sure you already know that by now.)

This bill will do nothing to solve our crisis, and indeed, it is nothing more than the beginning of a massive re-inflation campaign that could very well tear the economy to shreds, trigger a massive dollar crisis as foreign investors dump devalued dollars, and doom this nation to third world status.

The best and most thorough explanation I've seen since my undergraduate Money and Banking class (taught by a former member of the St. Louis Federal Reserve) of how the Fed works and how, in partnership with the U.S. Treasury, it will eventually turn the U.S. Dollar into toilet tissue can be found here.

You will come away amazed and enraged. I know I was.

Incidentally, the French are already calling for a real New World Order that will not include America at its head. And, as I've previously surmised, American led efforts such as I-VAWA and CEDAW will be allowed to die a quiet death.

I can just imagine major heads of state saying to themselves behind closed doors:

If those pussy-whipped Americans are capable of squandering the wealth and power of the most prosperous nation in the history of the world, why in the hell should we adopt their screwed up family values? Our women are just fine, thank you very much!

Here's a newsflash for the Marxist-Feminists:

On a worldwide scale; no one gives a fuck about 'chya. Nations do what they do in order to make nice nice with the current Superpower, not because they give a flying fudge about feminist family values. Declining American influence = declining feminist influence.

Case in point: The Russians, having had a heaping helping of Anti-Family Marxist propaganda, aren't trying to adopt Matriarchal Western values, for very compelling reasons.

In any event, there is no possible way that this long overdue economic correction can be avoided. Indeed, with our massive outstanding liabilities for social security, medicare, and the like, our incredible military spending, and the unceasing destruction of the most fundamental unit of economic production, the married family unit, the outcome is certain.

This attempt to keep the good times rolling will meet with failure. When and how the wheels fall off, I can only speculate. But I do know that those in Congress that voted YEA for this bill have betrayed the public trust, and all those who supported this bill should be voted out of office at the earliest opportunity!





(Politicians and Bankers team up to screw the gullible American populace).



Neither Conservative nor Liberal be.




Speaking of congress, we'll be talking about this subject at length today. I've said previously that I'm not a "conservative," and you're getting ready to find out why.

In a nutshell, I am a Classical Liberal who believes that people's private lives are none of my concern, so long as all participating parties are of legal age, consent to their lifestyles without duress or threat of violence, and don't fuck up shit for me and mine.

As a matter of fact, the main reason why I became an MRA is that feminists and power mongers passed a bunch of bullshit laws such as VAWA that threaten my liberties, in addition to slandering my honor as a man. My message to the "Do-Gooders" who brought all of this shit to fruition:


STAY THE F*&K OUTTA MY BITNESS BITCHES; AND DON'T DRAG MY GOOD NAME THROUGH THE MUD!!


In general, I support the right of religious and secular groups of various ideologies to contribute to the overall marketplace of ideas, because no one has a patent on the truth. Sometimes I can be right on one subject, but someone else might be more knowledgeable about another. I can accept that. Plus, I don't know enough about what is going on in the lives of other people to want to control their very human natures like feminists have sought to do.

However, those who would teach moral codes and the like, such as Islamic Supremacists, have no right to impose their teachings upon others.

And indeed, there is no need for moral systems to win converts by the sword, or by deception, as in the feminist/marxist case. If the belief system is in harmony with the Universal Laws that govern creation and human affairs, then people will seek out the teachings by their own accord. As it is written, people tend to be convicted by their own spirit.

For example, I support the right of two men or two women to have a private "marriage" ceremony with the group of one's choosing, make contractual obligations with one another, appoint one another as power of attorney, etc. As a matter of fact, I don't give a S&^T one way or another, because I personally don't hang in homosexual circles. Live and let live.

I don't support laws making "gay marriage" legal, nor do I support laws banning the practice.

Why? Because I personally believe that true and valid marriage, the form that societies base their civilizations upon, that involve men and women and children, are beyond the reach of government. With the exception of preventing forced marriages, or the marriages of adults to minor children, government has no role in marriage, and should stay as far away from it as possible [1][2][3].

In my perfect world, since many religious groups oppose homosexuality on principle, they would, of course retain the right to speak out against gay partnerships, and refuse to perform same-sex ceremonies; while pro-homosexual groups would continue to speak in favor of same sex unions, and gay friendly organizations would continue to "marry" gay couples.

Friendly debate, Yes. Laws supporting or banning same-sex ceremonies, No.

As highlighted above, the conflict between values is a prime example as to why our Constitutional system was designed the way it was. Our system is one that enforces the Rule of Law, and recognizes universal Natural Rights and responsibilities, and is the only way that differing groups of people can live together in peace and relative harmony. This is also the only way that equilibrium in the life of a nation can be maintained because, if the rights and responsibilities of a certain group are violated, be it because of racism, sexism, discrimination because of a certain creed, etc, then the natural reaction of the downtrodden group will be for them to organize and play the game of group politics. As time passes, individuals identify with the group instead of with the nation; and the individual group members may end up supporting a larger agenda that may in fact be against their own best interests.

This is the situation we have now in America... groups bitterly in competition for laws, policies, and programs that benefit their in-group members only, all the while corrupting and weakening the nation as a whole.

Entire classes of people, for example, Men and children, are seeing their Natural, God given rights to life, liberty, property, and the impartial adjudication of disputes trampled upon in order to give more and more rights (and less and less responsibilities) to women.

And, especially in the black American community, many are so fearful that the larger society will not protect their individual rights as people (for obvious historical reasons), that they support "leaders" that are, in reality, pushing agendas that are not in their best interests.





(Harriet Tubman)





(Frederick Douglas)




Instead of carrying on the tradition of self reliance and resistance to injustice displayed by honored ancestors such as Harriet Tubman and Frederick Douglas, many of us have the Great Society and Obamanation outlook of welfarism, underachievement, and bitter gender warfare.

When I say underachievement, I mean this: why are these leaders only offering incentives to make less than a certain income, when black Americans have the potential within themselves to earn as many dollars as they desire?

I don't know about you, but a salary of $250,000 a year is a pittance. I know that I can achieve greater financial success than this. Where are the leaders encouraging us to aim for the stars?

Why is it that black Americans are discouraged from forming the most effective family arrangement known to mankind? Why is it that the single mother family is the predominate arrangement for raising children, when our African ancestors and contemporaries treasure the institution of marriage (monogamous and polygamous) ?

You see, it makes no sense. And yet, it is because of group politics that many are fearful to examine these obvious contradictions, and act to correct them. It's hard to straighten up and fly right when the Great Ark of the Group has already capsized.

Membership in the group is simply too valuable to lose, even if the tribe is sinking in the cold, dark waters of the North Atlantic, just like the Titanic.

This state of affairs is completely unsustainable in the long run, for a host of reasons discussed at length on this blog, and is completely at odds with our traditions of Constitutional Republicanism.

Human beings deserve and should expect equal rights and responsibilities; not SPECIAL rights and waived responsibilities. This is against the Universal Law, and those that violate the Law are always punished.

Anything less than this standard of Equal rights and responsibilities is unjust, tyrannical, and must be challenged, opposed, and defeated, lest the malignant cancer of favoritism spread and kill the body politic.

Forgive me for digressing, but please keep these ideals in mind as I continue with this post.



A Woman's Work.





While surfing the web for interesting material to write about, I found this article entitled, Women's Work:

Prostitution, some say, is the oldest profession in the world.

Having existed in nearly every culture, every continent and every century for which we have a historical understanding, women who perform sex acts in exchange for money have alternately endured scorn, stigma, intolerance and indifference, while being almost universally viewed as having “fallen” from decent society.

Here in America, our legal and moral responses to “the great social evil” have remained relatively unchanged for more than a hundred years, and these fallen women have remained on the margins of nearly every community.

At the beginning of the 21st century, however a combination of sexual liberty and modern technology is democratizing prostitution without waiting for it to be decriminalized...

Ahh... good ol' Prostitution. Is it a social evil?

Some people would answer in the affirmative without hesitation. I take a different view.

My position is simple: Prostitution should be legalized, regulated, and taxed, like any other occupation. Women who are over the legal age of consent, who are free of sexually transmitted diseases, and who are not being forced into sex work, have every right to enter this profession if they so choose.

For those who wish to learn more about sex-work, pornography, and prostitution from someone actively involved in the business, you might want to stop by and check out my good friend Renegade Evolution's SWOP-East Blog.

My commentary will focus on why prostitution should be legal and commercially available to Men, from a Men's Rights perspective.


Our author writes:

Go to any large American city, or any number of small ones. Find the poorest of neighborhoods. The one where drugs are easy to come by and gun violence is impossible to get rid of. Look for women who appear to have few, if any, options. Odds are you can get a blowjob for just a bit more than you can a Big Mac.

But if you want to ensure a successful night, you might consult a local Web site before you go:

“Cruised both East and West 10th Street this afternoon and saw a couple very heavy BSW [black streetwalkers] on the Eastside but nothing worth picking up. Think the heat was a little high for them today.”


“Was out early Thursday morning 1-3 a.m. Picked up a WSW [white streetwalker]. Jenny, blonde, looked to have a nice body, in her 20s, pretty girl, OK [oral sex] skills.”


“Sunday 6:30ish I saw a tall, slim blonde standing on East Washington. Not sure what intersection but it was a few blocks west of Euclid. I made a second pass and this girl was pretty cute. Almost too good to be true...”


... You don’t have to know about the Web site to know where to find streetwalkers in Indianapolis, but it certainly helps. At least that’s what one local cabdriver named Mike believes. He frequently procures the services of prostitutes and he is one of the most frequent posters on the site.

Thirty-two, divorced and the father of three boys under 11, Mike drives a cab at night and works at a restaurant during the day. He’s been posting on the site since he found out about it from another cab driver two years ago. Even though he’s rather non-committal about whether or not prostitution should be a crime, he’s adamant that the social networking aspect of the Web site is a good thing...

The writer also notes:

... Like Mike the cab driver, Jerry is another Indianapolis man who uses a local Web site to post reports of his successes and failures in his business dealings with escorts.

“I’m very careful,” he says over lunch in Broad Ripple. “I’m clean, and I expect the women I deal with to be clean also. I’m not just looking for sex. I’m looking — and willing to pay for — an experience.”

In his mid-40s, Jerry is divorced and the father of two teenagers. He owns his business, one that affords him the luxury of spending quite a few hours and hundreds of dollars for the company of women each month.

“I’m happy being single,” he says. “I’ve got my business, my kids and a good relationship with my ex-wife. I have no interest in having a girlfriend, or being in a serious relationship right now. But that doesn’t mean I don’t want to have sex.

“Look, I’ve tried being honest with women I’ve dated,” he says when asked why he chooses to pay for sex rather than just date like most single adults. “I tell them I don’t want a relationship; they say they understand; a couple weeks or months go by and pretty soon they want more. And I don’t want to give them more.

“This way,” he says, “nobody gets hurt...”

The journalist, telling us about Prostitution in Amsterdam, remarks:

... The Dutch government runs a pretty tight ship where prostitution is concerned; it is a $1 billion industry for the country and accounts for 5 percent of the GDP. Presumably, these women are all legal residents, they are all of consent age, they are all licensed and regularly provided medical exams, which they must pass in order to remain in business.

These women are all here by choice. They are all consenting adults. And they earn their living thanks in no small part to American men, from the hordes of frat boys who trip through the streets each summer, to men like an Indianapolis financier named David who recently confided in me that he frequently travels to Amsterdam for “sex vacations.”

Nearing 60, married for nearly 30 years and otherwise completely faithful to his wife and mother of his children, David has been coming to Amsterdam to legally have sex with prostitutes off and on for nearly two decades.

“It started by accident,” he tells me in a conspiratorial whisper. “I have a client with offices in Amsterdam, and I started traveling there about once a year on business; now, I just build in an extra few days for non-work activities.

"My only goal is to have sex with all the women I want to,” he offers as a vacation itinerary. “Sometimes it’s only three or four; once it was more than 10. Last time, I was there for only two days and found one girl to spend both of them with. Cost me $5,000, but it was worth every dime.”

At the end of his confession, David explains that he wouldn’t risk paying for a prostitute in the United States. And that he believes it should be legal. To punctuate his point, he quotes George Carlin: “I don’t understand why prostitution is illegal. Selling is legal, fucking is legal. So why isn’t it legal to sell fucking?...”

When you have a moment, check out the entire article.


So you might be asking, what's your point here?

Lemme break it down.

Men who visit prostitutes, especially in the English speaking countries, tend to be looked down upon by polite society. Shaming language such as, "losers", "abusers", "weirdos", "perverts", and other grade school insults are commonplace. Men who decide to bypass today's modern feminist woman and pay prostitutes for sex are urged to "step up their game" and "find a real woman to date", among other retarded advice.

However, the article above tells us that normal men, who have found "real women" to mate with and marry, prefer, for various personal reasons, to pay for sex. These men could be family members, co-workers, friends or acquaintances. And most of the men featured have found out too late that getting married in the West isn't a "death to us part" proposition. Maybe they've figured out by now that life, love, and marriage aren't as simplistic as it's made out to be.

The way I see it, the hysteria surrounding this most intimate of transactions is another example of society brainwashing a man from fulfilling one of his most deep-seated desires at his discretion.

What women (and a good many Manginas) fail to understand is that the vast majority of men are hardwired to be lean, mean, sex machines; so much so that many women aren't in a position to keep up.

Men are not women; we are fundamentally different. And when it comes to love and sex, we process these impulses using quite different operating systems.






(Dr. Louann Brizendine)



Dr. Louann Brizendine informs us in her magnificent book, The Female Brain (highly recommended):

The Great Sexual Divide


"The sex-related centers in the male brain are actually about two times larger than parallel structures in the female brain. When it comes to the brain, size does make a difference in the way women and men think about, respond to, and experience sex.

Men, quite literally, have sex on their minds more than women do. They feel pressure in their gonads and prostates unless they ejaculate frequently. Males have double the brain space and processing power devoted to sex as females. Just as women have an eight-lane superhighway for processing emotion while men have a country road, men have O'Hare Airport as a hub for processing thoughts about sex whereas women have the airfield nearby that lands small and private planes... Male brain systems for sex are on alert with every waft of perfume and every female that walks (pp 91-92)."

(Compare O'Hare International Airport...)




(... to Greenwood Municipal Airport. Any Questions?)




Dr. Brizendine explains how a woman's sex drive can be easily shut down by other activities, such as caring for an infant:

"Often mother love and breast feeding replace or interfere with a new mother's desire for her partner...

... like all women who are in skin to skin contact with babies and breast feeding- has a brain that marinating in oxytocin and dopamine making her feel loved, deeply bonded, and physically and emotionally satisfied. It's no wonder that she has no need for sexual contact. Many of the positive feelings she usually gets from sexual intercourse are evoked, several times daily, by meeting the basic physical needs of her young children (p. 106-107)."

This last paragraph brings to mind a universally recognized truth for many married couples... the sex stops, or moves to a crawl, once children enter the picture.

Let's take a look at a few examples.




(What she's really thinking...)






From Momlogic.com:

10 Tricks for Moms to Avoid Sex
Monday, October 6, 2008

Forget the cliche "Not tonight honey, I have a headache" excuse for getting out of doing the deed.

Like it or not, when you have kids, sex often takes a back seat to other items on our "to do" lists. When it comes down to it, given the option of "getting it on" or house cleaning (so we're not forced to outfit the family in protective Hazmat suits) -- we choose the latter. Heck, we only have a limited amount of time, something's gotta give.

Often, we moms end up going through the motions. Recently our post "What Moms Think About During Sex" made it clear just how tired and distracted many of us can be while fulfilling our "wifely duties." How do we get into that (missionary) position in the first place? Tired old avoidance ploys like "Not tonight honey, I have a headache," simply don't work anymore -- especially with the invention of Advil.

Here are some handy ways to get out of "doing it" -- if you just can't fit sex into your schedule...

From The Standard:

Published on 06/10/2008

Differences in sexual appetite may be driven by evolution.

A woman’s sex drive begins to plummet once she is in a secure relationship, according to research. Researchers from Germany found that four years into a relationship, less than half of 30-year-old women wanted regular sex. Conversely, the team found a man’s libido remained the same regardless of how long he had been in a relationship.

Writing in the journal Human Nature, the scientists said the differences resulted from how humans had evolved. For men, a good reason their sexual motivation remained constant was to guard against being cuckolded by another male.

The researchers from Hamburg-Eppendorf University Hospital interviewed 530 men and women about their relationships. They found 60 per cent of 30-year-old women wanted sex "often" at the beginning of a relationship, but within four years of the relationship this figure fell to under 50 per cent, and after 20 years it dropped to about 20 per cent. In contrast, they found the proportion of men wanting regular sex remained at between 60-80 per cent, regardless of how long they had been in a relationship...

From Divorce Busting:

Sex Drives: His and Hers

By Michele Weiner-Davis

Hi Michele,

I'd like to ask your advice about sex. My husband and I have very different sex drives. For him, everyday would be great, and twice a day would be greater. For me, once a week, but to accommodate him, I'd have sex twice a week. I don't think I'm abnormal, but he asks, "What's wrong with you?" I say it's normal for a couple to have sex once or twice a week. He says he doesn't care about 'normal', it's not enough for him. He has a point, but everyday and even every other day is too much for me. We've been married almost 20 years and have both built up a lot of resentment towards each other. He, because of the sex, and me, for a whole lot of other marital problems. I never did have a high sex drive, even before we were married. Neither of us know how to solve this problem, but it's a big one.

Kathy

Dear Kathy,

I am very glad that you are asking for feedback about your sexual relationship with your husband because the patterns in your marriage are so common that others reading your letter and my response might benefit greatly.

First of all, know that testosterone, one of the hormones responsible for sex drive, is 20-40% higher in men than women. Though it is not always the case, it is very common for men to desire sex more often than their wives. This gender difference often creates problems in marriages, particularly when people blame each other for being different. Men think their wives are passionless and women think their husbands are sex maniacs. (I write about this in Getting Through to the Man You Love). Blame is the thing that destroys marriages, not differences in libido.

When men and women have substantially different sex drives, something interesting happens. Most women need to feel close to their partners emotionally to desire sex. Women need to spend time with their partners, to communicate on a deep level and feel like they're team mates in regards to housework and kids and so on. All this has to be in place for most women to really desire their men.

Men, on the other hand, generally need to feel close to their partners physically before they invest a great deal of energy into their relationships. So she's waiting for him to be more intimate emotionally and he's waiting for her to be more tuned into him physically and the resentment that results in this waiting game is so huge, it's beyond belief.

That being said, it's really important for both of you to become more understanding of each other. This means you both need to try to imagine what it would be like to live in each others shoes for a while. He probably walks around feeling that if you loved him more, you would be more sensitive to his needs. He undoubtedly feels hurt and rejected and might even question his sex appeal...

There are countless articles, studies, and reports that prove that the average Man desires sex a lot more than the average woman.

And in light of the overwhelming evidence, I will boldly state that the current social arrangement; that men are supposed to grow up, marry only one woman, and confine his sexual activity to that one woman only for the rest of his natural life is not the best lifestyle fit for every man on the planet, and to expect all men to conform to this one size fits all ideal is a recipe for frustration and failure.

Some men are perfectly happy living a totally monogamous lifestyle, and there is nothing wrong with that. However in real life, many men will not be able (or willing) to meet such a standard. And from a historical perspective, when we consider that Prostitution, Concubinage, and Polygamous marriage has been much more common and widespread than our American monogamous model, we come to the conclusion that our current social model is both limited in scope and shortsighted in its understanding of the nature of the Male Sex.

Also when one considers that a married woman is no longer obligated to perform her basic carnal duties, and that if a husband complains about a lack of loving, he is committing an offense akin to marital rape or some other alleged form of "violence," the present state of affairs is completely absurd.

In addition, the fact that prostitution, a traditional outlet of sexual frustration for Men in Western culture [1][2], is illegal doesn't help matters, and the overall expectation of 100% fidelity at all times and in all situations greatly discourages today's modern man from marriage:

A) Why marry if you can get all the Poontang you can get if you remain single?

B) If you get married and sexual peccadilloes occur, are you prepared to lose your property, children, family, livelihood, or even your life?

Now I know some of you might think that I am placing undue emphasis on Sex, as if there are no other considerations such as honoring one's vows, the exercise of self discipline and self control, religious or spiritual principles, among other things.

Indeed, there are many valid arguments as to why sexual restraint is necessary.

As an example of why the male sex drive would need to be subliminated, author Muata Ashby, in his book Sacred Sexuality: Ancient Egyptian Tantric Yoga, explains that:

"... the true identity of a human being is not sexual, not the body, mind, senses or anything which is in the realm of time and space because the realm of time and space is the realm of duality and illusion (p. 101)..."

The author also notes that, on a physical level:

"Through celibacy, right action and spiritual study, a deeper feeling can be discovered wherein the very source of one's true being can manifest. This is why the ancient spiritual texts of all faiths exhort all followers to keep chaste and devoted to the Divine... The practice of celibacy allows spiritual energy to flow into an elevated process of mental development rather than the degraded thoughts of lust which rob the mind of its peace, contentment and inner creative ability (p. 154)...

... It must be clearly understood that the purpose of sexuality is procreation and not recreation. It is a sacred act to engender life and is not designed for the purpose of daily, weekly, or yearly practice... Anyone who does not control the sexual urge cannot expect to evolve spiritually since the sexual activity itself disrupts the hormones of the body and the mind's ability to see clearly... it drains the physical and mental energy of the person (p. 171)."

(Napoleon Hill)



Noted writer and success coach Napoleon Hill, in his masterwork of Think and Grow Rich, tells us that:

"The human mind responds to stimulation!

Among the greatest and most powerful of... stimuli is the urge of sex. When harnessed and transmuted, this driving force is capable of lifting people into that higher sphere of thought (genius level) that enables them to master the sources of worry and petty annoyance that beset their pathway on the lower plane (p. 153)."

Mr. Hill also notes that most people do not succeed before the age of Forty because:

"...study disclosed that the major reason why the majority of people who succeed do not begin to do so before the age of forty to fifty is their tendency to dissipate their energies through overindulgence in physical expression of the emotion of sex. Most people never learn that sex has other possibilities, which far transcend in importance that of mere physical expression. The majority of those who make this discovery do so after having wasted many years when the sex energy is at its height, prior to the age of forty five to fifty. This is usually followed by noteworthy achievement (p. 154)."

(J.A. Rogers)



Author J.A. Rogers, in his classic work Sex and Race volume 3 writes:

"The intellectual, the artist, and the business man all have a tendency to shun the material woman and her simpler, often nagging ways, for the fast woman-the type with the cocktail glass, the cigarette and the abundant display of well-stockinged legs, the kind that shuns maternity. "The attraction towards prostitutes," says Bloch, "is one of the most remarkable phenomena in the psyche of modern civilized man; it is the curse of the evolution of civilization..."

(A Greek Hetaira)







(Love in India)

... "The preference of the cultured Greeks, Hindus, and Romans for the company of the hetaira, or intellectual prostitute, is well known. Rome, Greece, Corinth, Ephesus, ended their days in a glorious outburst of licentiousness (p. 191)..."

Mr. Joseph Unwin, author of Sex and Culture, bases his entire work on the premise that civilization makes its ascent when the sex drive is channeled into constructive activity and remains highly regulated; and that societies fall when sexual mores loosen, leading to a irresistable landslide of corruption and collapse.

With all that said, I recognize and respect the power of sex. It is the force that engenders life, and reckless handling of this awesome power can bring death, decay, and destruction. A society as sexually promiscuous as ours seems to have thrown caution to the wind, and has turned the Western world into Fuckfest 2008, possibly signifying the end of the Age of Western Dominance.

Ironically, our society only allows near absolute freedom of sexual expression within certain parameters that does nothing to contribute to social stability and long term sustainability, and goes a long way towards undermining it.

If we as a culture are so hellbent on allowing women sexual liberation by any means necessary, why is it that we prohibit them from working in clean, regulated, and safe brothels that would contribute income to the public coffers, lower rates of crime and disease for both the working girls and their clients, and a healthy outlet for the sexual desires of men whom, for various reasons, are unable to obtain satisfaction from the women in their lives?

Where is the Male sexual revolution? No matter how much I read about those damnable men allegedly seducing all manner of naive and innocent young women, from the facts I've gathered, which are in listed in nauseating detail on this blog, from marriage, to divorce, to child custody, and Child Support debt slavery; in every way that truly matters, it seems that Men are punished in a multitude of ways that women are not, if they are careless (or even if they are cautious) in their love affairs. It seems men in the West are getting the short end of the stick every which way.

Indeed, as we are not allowed to take our pleasure for its own sake without a host of conventions, customs, rules, consequences and burdens.

It makes no sense to confine prostitution to the street corner or the anonymous hotel room, which only increases the probability of crime and disease for all parties involved.

It makes no sense for a man in our legal climate to marry, and it's also pretty hazardous, thanks to discriminatory legislation such as VAWA, to shack up with today's modern woman. Indeed, many individuals, feminists and otherwise, have made it perfectly clear that men are dangerous dullards that should take women seriously when they loudly proclaim they need men like fish need bicycles.

And thanks to the marriage and mating strike, its become obvious to even the casual observer that more and more men are heeding that advice. In many cases, it's in a man's best interest to maintain as little contact with women, on and off the job, as possible.

So why is it then that men are forced, due to the lack of legal and safe alternatives, to "harass" this same pool of women just to have their very real physical needs met?

While I understand that excessive indulgence in sex is ruinous for society, and that marriage and family are very important and the building block of a nation, and that celibacy and sex transmutation have their important places, I also recognize the fact that little to no indulgence in intercourse is just as ruinous.

If we are going to live in a society where the sexes are encouraged to go their separate ways, then it would be in everyone's best interests for the sexual needs of both men and women to be satisfied in a safe, economically beneficial manner, in addition to the basic overall premise that legal age adults have the right to make consensual contracts for sexual fulfillment. The blunt truth is that there are plenty of women willing to supply the service if their conditions are met... only social conventions (and ironically, a great deal of feminist criticism) and legal prohibitions deter many of them from entering into the business.

(A brief aside... contrary to popular belief, there are women in the world who love to have sex for its own sake, and would be happy as a clam to provide a multitude of services to men on a professional level and support themselves in the process. Believe me... I've met them. And yes ladies, there are "establishments" just for you, that cater to women only. In Asia, they are known as Host Clubs. Toku does believe in true equality between the sexes. Handle your business.)

In summary,

Prostitution should be legalized because it would be of great benefit to Men, single, divorced, or married. Being able to visit a legal, clean, inviting, and safe Bordello would do much to demolish the current prevailing standard in the US of A that "Real Men" have to either:


A) Put themselves in legal and financial jeopardy by marrying or living with today's Western woman simply to have a normal sexual relationship, unless or until she simply stops upholding her end of the arrangement. And since American men are legally barred from taking extra wives, they either have to become an eunuch, or engage in some sort of scandalous affair that, more often than not, places himself in a worse position (divorce, loss of reputation, etc).

(The wife, upon hearing of her husband's Dirty Dancing, is shocked... absolutely shocked that her husband would dare forage for Hott Sexx from some other gal... never mind that they haven't had "relations" since 1979... Let's gut that Cheatin' Bastard at the Divorce Hearing!!!)


B) Be forced into near celibacy because one does not want to put himself at the mercy of decidedly hostile Anti-Male laws, customs, and cultural norms. Or, put himself in legal jeopardy in the Single Guy's never ending Hunt for Hookups and Phat Coochie... guess you're damned if you do and damned if you don't.


If Prostitution were legal, regulated, and taxed, today's modern man would have an alternative to our present day system of sexual highway robbery. Maybe this is the real reason why the World's Oldest Profession is illegal?

In any event, when you come down to it, a man is going to potentially spend a lot more money, time, and anguish when he wines, dines, mates, and marries good ol' Mary Jane from around the way. But... we don't label giving Mary Jane a diamond ring in exchange for her lifelong sex services "prostitution" because...

Anyway, advanced students will want to browse the writings of the Mighty Marc Rudov to learn more about the terrifying power of the Pussy Cartel.


I don't know about you, but it's about time to...







...Legalize that shit Baby!! 'Cause Pimpin ain't easy.


P.S. If our culture was one that had an enlightened attitude about sex and sensibility, men the world over could enjoy high class service such as this article details.

In Japan, for example, prostitution isn't some dirty word that is to be avoided during polite conversation... but a work of art. Korea ain't no slouch either.

If only we in the West could become so civilized. One of these days, Men are going to wake up and start fighting for what's in our best interests for a change.

Next time on Togakure School... Polygamy and why it's good for ya!

Toku.

Alan Stang: Playboy and Women!

An interesting article, sent to me by one of my excellent College Buds.

Thanks for the heads up!

Despite being written from a Victorian perspective, it manages to hit many major points of interest, including the connection between feminist icon Margaret Sanger [a] and the Nazi Eugenicist movement, the Gospel of Marxist Feminism according to Simone de Beauvoir, the formerly low illegitimacy rates in the Black family (before the institution was totally annihilated), and much more.

By the way, I am opposed to the bulk of Victorian values for two very important reasons.

Firstly, I do not believe that a healthy expression of sex and eroticism is incompatible with solid family values. As I have written previously, many cultures, with a much longer track record than ours, have managed to strike a balance between sex and sensibility. So to say that our present familial breakdown is mainly a function of pictures of nude women being available for widespread consumption is a massive oversimplification of our present situation. The enjoyment of the naked female body and strong moral and family values are NOT mutually exclusive in my view.

Secondly, the whole "Woman on a Pedestal" attitude that Victorianism represents created the atmosphere for Old Skool feminists to openly discriminate against men both in law and in practice. In addition, the Mangina tendencies that Victorianism introduced proved to the the perfect Trojan Horse for the ideology known as Cultural Marxism to take hold.




(Earnest Belfort Bax)



But more on this when we cover the works of English Socialist E. Belfort Bax. I hope to prove, in future posts, that the only way for Men to reclaim our ancient Rights is to take the whole ugly Victorian-Chivalry-Woman-First ethic behind the proverbial barn and put it out of its misery.

Without further ado, here is the excerpt of Playboy and Women:

PLAYBOY AND WOMEN


by Alan Stang
March 7, 2008
NewsWithViews.com

In earlier sections of this extended treatise, we saw that so-called “women’s liberation” – like Organized Sodomy – is a weapon the conspiracy for world government devised to destroy the foundation of our civilization so that our country could easily be submerged and dissolved in the totalitarian socialist system it seeks. In this session, let’s see where “liberation” has taken women. We saw that the Communists were among the earliest advocates of modern “women’s liberation.”

An important element in “women’s liberation” is the so-called “Playboy philosophy” devised by magazine publisher Hugh Hefner in his degenerate Playboy magazine. What? Isn’t Hefner’s pseudo “philosophy” the opposite of “women’s liberation? Well, what is the “Playboy philosophy?”

Before Playboy, parents warned daughters about all the things a couple of millennia of experience prove man does not want. They told her that the natural man does not want flowers. He does not want dinner. He doesn’t want to waste time with sweet talk. He wants to walk into a bar, get drunk with a compliant woman in a spirit of perfect equality and then jump into bed. He doesn’t even want to waste time with foreplay. If there is a pregnancy, it’s her problem. In short, he wants to sweep into the dustbin of history all those “prudish, Victorian” obstacles.

To prevent that deletion, it was necessary to domesticate the male. He was required to call for a young lady at home – actually get out of his car and knock on the door – where Dad could eyeball him while cleaning his shotgun. Racking a twelve-gauge shotgun, even empty, makes such an authoritative, spiritually satisfying sound.

At dinner, as an expression of respect, he was required to stand up when the lady departed the table for the ladies’ room and again when she returned. And the lady was required to wear an antiquated garment called a dress, a garment with no legs you can see in “Gone With the Wind.” There were separate entrances to cocktail lounges oddly called “Ladies Entrance.”

I realize this next item will be challenged by people who are not as well-versed in history as they should be, but the fact is that ladies back then did not routinely display their belly buttons in public. For his part, the male did not show the different hemispheres in his behind unless he was a plumber, working beneath a sink. And the male alone wore judicious tattoos, usually memorializing his military unit. The dad with the shotgun required that the man bring the lady home at a specified time.

Because of these millennia-tested protections, unauthorized pregnancy was relatively rare. For just one example, we are talking about a time when there was such a lawgiver in most “Negro” homes, with the happy result that the rate of illegitimacy there was lower than it is in white families today. In the relatively unlikely event of such a pregnancy despite these precautions, the intransigent, deflowering male was encouraged to marry in a “shotgun wedding,” most of which, surprisingly, survived. These were just a few aspects of the then cultural matrix...

Be sure to read the rest, and check out his insightful column on Communism and Women, a topic that we have explored thoroughly on this blog, here.

Toku.

The Australian: On Fertility. (18 and Over Only)

(Please be advised, there is nudity and graphic depictions of sex in this post.)


Good Morning!

Kumo is studying like mad now-a-days, learning about the intricacies of Foreign Exchange trading. As a result, my posts will be a little slow in coming.

Please forgive me in advance.

I'd like to share this excellent article entitled Sex Revolution Robbed Us of Fertility.

Sex revolution robbed us of fertility

Angela Shanahan | September 15, 2007

OVER 13 years as a columnist for The Australian and other publications I have received many letters.

But I have never received one like this.

It was written in response to a column I wrote a few weeks ago on sexual imagery in advertising.

But coincidentally it arrived just after the Pope's remarks this month about the seemingly obvious link between selfishness and our inability to produce children.

The thirty something writer cut through the demographic babble about the fertility crisis and heartbreakingly encapsulated something that is staring us in the face.






(Pope Benedict XVI)


Despite the media's discomfort, the fertility crisis in the West is a moral problem and, of course, only moral leaders such as Pope Benedict XVI have the guts and authority to enunciate it.

The truth about declining fertility is not all that complicated. It is the inevitable result of a so-called sexual revolution that broke the nexus between sex and having children, and has skewed our relationships, particularly marriage, forever.

The author is right on the money.

What she doesn't say, however, is that the sexual revolution was devised, BY MEN [1][2], and advocated, BY FEMINIST WOMEN, for the specific purpose of destroying Western civilization. It should be noted that this is all part of a masterplan that is over two thousand years old.

And they've done a masterful job, as this article by the Excellent Howard Center demonstrates.

I should also point out that the idea that we as a society have to embrace total sexual licentiousness on the one hand, or a completely closed, sexless, and frigid society on the other is a totally false one.

There is ample room for a traditional, family first culture that still has a healthy appreciation of sex.





In Japan, for example, we have a long tradition of sex and sensibility. As we can see in their pillowbook, the Shijuhatte, the very fertile ancient Japanese had no qualms with erotic expression.








Moving to India, we can see that the art of love is very well developed, and the Indian nation managed to build strong family networks that have served them well for thousands of years.

Erotic masterworks of Indian origin include the Kamasutra and the Ananga Ranga.







The Chinese too, with their strong tradition of family and morality, have a long history, and familiarity of things sexual, as their ancient system, the Tao seems to suggest.


It is becoming increasingly clear that we as a people need to come to terms with our sexual expression, and seek out a healthy, and manageable balance. As the Greeks would say, "Nothing in Excess: Moderation in all things."

The Australian continues:

What the media coyly refer to as private morality -- also known as sexual morality -- is having all too public social consequences.

On average, women in Europe will now only bear 1.5 children each, and in some places it is down to 1.2. The enlightened West can't produce enough children to fuel its economy or maintain its culture.

The enlightened West isn't the only society that is suffering from terminal illness. The once fertile island nation of Japan is dying, just as we are.

The Chinese too are beginning to manifest the same symptoms.

The Indian nation, with the passage of the notorious 498a law, among other Leftist feminist measures, is starting to feel the pain. Their suffering is but a foreshadow of what is to come, unless they act decisively.

The common theme is that the governing elite of these nations has decided, in varying degrees, to accept the poisonous philosophies of Marxism and Feminism.

The way of feminism is the way of death.

Getting back to the piece:

In western Europe nothing will change this short of some great and terrible upheaval, such as another war. No amount of economic fiddling with family tax rates, no amount of child care or incentives for women to work, not even the threat of cultural extinction as a result of mass migration from Africa and the Middle East, will change it.

In fact, despite its tragic cultural effects, mass migration is probably the only thing that will demographically save Europe, as it has saved the US: the only country in the developed world that fully reproduces itself, courtesy of its Latino population.

Shanahan continues:

The Mexican American birthrate of about 3.3 is higher than the birthrate in Mexico, despite Mexican Americans being a poor group in every way.

The reason for the higher birthrate among Mexican illegals is fairly simple... can anyone say Anchor babies?

Moving on:

This proves something that sociologists know but don't say: cultural factors are much more important for fertility than economics.

And in sociologist-speak, culture is code for things such as religion and our sexual mores, including our marriage patterns, or what the aridly secular West will timidly go as far as calling our values.

So what are these values that are a prerequisite for stable societies that can at least reproduce themselves? The most important factor in fertility is marriage. Late marriage and failure to marry is the biggest single factor affecting fertility in the West.

Bingo!

Where people don't marry and marriage as an institution is devalued, with serial relationships replacing marriage (not to mention weird permutations such as gay marriage), societies suffer declining fertility.

Even if women want children, because women's fertility is finite as my correspondent points out, the emotional stress of serial non-marriage plays havoc with the possibility of partnering for life.

It is a terrible catch22. But as my correspondent also rightly bemoans, so far almost all the discussion about fertility and marriage has been about women, as if their desires and motivations were the only factor.

A lot of truth here. However, our author is a little misguided. It is not a catch 22.

Women are human beings with equal worth before The Holy One. Women have the ability and the capacity to make their own decisions. Ultimately, blame must be assigned to women themselves, as they are legally and morally responsible for their own choices.

However, I do recognize that very powerful outside forces have acted upon them. In essence, all of us, men and women alike, have been deceived.

So then, I assign blame, in order of most to least responsible:

1) Powerful men, and subservient feminist women who lobbied and brainwashed the gullible masses

2) Leaders in business, religion, and government. These are the people we trusted to look out for us, and to act in our best interests. However, our religious leaders, our politicians, our arbiters of law, and our corporate leaders have betrayed all of us out of cowardice, fear, and greed.

3) Women themselves, because, as stated earlier, they are the ultimate keepers of sexual and marital life. It is illegal and immoral to force a woman to mate or marry against her will, and rightfully so. Hence, she is responsible for making the decisions that not only affect her, but affect all of society. So then, if we are having issues with a decline in marriage and childbirth due to rampant divorce (which is initiated by women in the majority of cases), abortion (again, women have sole jurisdiction in this area), and promiscuity, then women must be prepared to accept their liability in this matter. A woman always has the right to say NO, after all.

4) Men, because many of us remain ignorant of what is really going on, and because many of us aided, and continue to aid, abetted and continue to abet, feminism and all of the cultural degradation that comes with it. We excuse feminine bad behavior, and we allow women to use and abuse us. And worst of all, we refuse to acknowledge our own worth as makers and keepers of the most artificial of enterprises, civilization.

Lets keep it moving:

However, studies done in the late 1990s in Scandinavia, where almost 60per cent of births are ex-nuptial, discovered a much stronger connection between the attitude of the man in a cohabiting relationship, as to whether a formal marriage eventuated, than the attitude of the woman.

Cohabiting men were found to be far more hesitant than women to formalise the relationship. Furthermore, this pattern holds true even in relationships that have already produced children.

Among the childless, men seem to fear that marriage will push them into more of a provider role. They harbour strong doubts about the ultimate value of a relationship -- whether it will be lifelong -- and are less likely than women to yield to normative pressure from parents. What exactly was the word the Pope used: selfish?

This is much more a picture of reluctant youthful grooms being dragged to the altar than of reluctant New Age feminist brides not wanting to be tied down with an uneven share of the household chores and child care, which is what feminist academics claim is the motivator for the new non-marriage relationship.

In fact, it emphasises how little our sexual expectations have changed -- because women still want stability, marriage and children -- but, at the same time, how badly the new sexual norms are treating women.

Who now quotes with approval the original shallow feminist rhetoric, when women thought that armed with the pill they would hold all the cards, that they would not be tied down and would be free to act just like men? The experiences of women such as the one who sent me that letter belie all that propaganda.

Instead, many women are fooled into a series of unfulfilling relationships, becoming empty vessels for sex. Says my correspondent of these relationships: "I thought I was offering myself for marriage." Instead, having given away their most precious asset, their fertility, many women have played right into the hands of men...

So close, and yet so far...

I utterly reject the claim that men are being selfish, and that women are being victimzed. As with a lot of things in life, it's not that simple.

Yes, there are men that have no intentions of getting married. But what our author doesn't understand is that there is tremendous pressure, from the highest levels of religious, political, and commerical organizations to make marriage a figurative, and sometimes a literal deathtrap from a man. A man with any intelligence who is living in the Western world realizes that there is nothing to be gained from marrying the thoroughly brainwashed Western woman, except divorce, heartache, loss of children, property, and reputation, and so forth.

Marriage is a proposition for suckers, and men are getting wise to that game.

The Marriage Strike is on, and for damn good reasons that our author has failed to address.

But she is right about one thing.

Male fertility and drive are the initiators of all life, on a philosophical and a mundane level. Man's sex drive is a constant and insistent force, whereas woman's sex drive is both weaker and more variable [aa][bb]. Anyone who is familiar with gay people, for example, knows that in the main, two men together results in a boosting of sexual energy and libido, while lesbians do not display the same kind of behavior.

The ancients knew this well, and they believed that children were of the father, and that the mother was the sacred earth that nourished the man's lifegiving seed. Even our modern day search for the origins of mankind, identity and genealogy is traced most easily, and accurately, through the father.

So then, I argue that as soon as the irrational restrictions that have been imposed upon men have been repealed, and that the male Thumos, is acknowledged and respected once more, then women will have their families and their children, children will have their fathers and their mothers, society will have its workers and citizens, and the world will be a better place.

But until these wrongs have been righted, expect the decline of the West, and the global economic and cultural concept that it has championed for decades. If we don't seriously analyze the issues and make rapid, positive, and much needed change, then the Sun will set on Western idealism, for all time.

Kumo out.

(This post has been mailed to The Australian.)