Alan Stang: Playboy and Women!

An interesting article, sent to me by one of my excellent College Buds.

Thanks for the heads up!

Despite being written from a Victorian perspective, it manages to hit many major points of interest, including the connection between feminist icon Margaret Sanger [a] and the Nazi Eugenicist movement, the Gospel of Marxist Feminism according to Simone de Beauvoir, the formerly low illegitimacy rates in the Black family (before the institution was totally annihilated), and much more.

By the way, I am opposed to the bulk of Victorian values for two very important reasons.

Firstly, I do not believe that a healthy expression of sex and eroticism is incompatible with solid family values. As I have written previously, many cultures, with a much longer track record than ours, have managed to strike a balance between sex and sensibility. So to say that our present familial breakdown is mainly a function of pictures of nude women being available for widespread consumption is a massive oversimplification of our present situation. The enjoyment of the naked female body and strong moral and family values are NOT mutually exclusive in my view.

Secondly, the whole "Woman on a Pedestal" attitude that Victorianism represents created the atmosphere for Old Skool feminists to openly discriminate against men both in law and in practice. In addition, the Mangina tendencies that Victorianism introduced proved to the the perfect Trojan Horse for the ideology known as Cultural Marxism to take hold.




(Earnest Belfort Bax)



But more on this when we cover the works of English Socialist E. Belfort Bax. I hope to prove, in future posts, that the only way for Men to reclaim our ancient Rights is to take the whole ugly Victorian-Chivalry-Woman-First ethic behind the proverbial barn and put it out of its misery.

Without further ado, here is the excerpt of Playboy and Women:

PLAYBOY AND WOMEN


by Alan Stang
March 7, 2008
NewsWithViews.com

In earlier sections of this extended treatise, we saw that so-called “women’s liberation” – like Organized Sodomy – is a weapon the conspiracy for world government devised to destroy the foundation of our civilization so that our country could easily be submerged and dissolved in the totalitarian socialist system it seeks. In this session, let’s see where “liberation” has taken women. We saw that the Communists were among the earliest advocates of modern “women’s liberation.”

An important element in “women’s liberation” is the so-called “Playboy philosophy” devised by magazine publisher Hugh Hefner in his degenerate Playboy magazine. What? Isn’t Hefner’s pseudo “philosophy” the opposite of “women’s liberation? Well, what is the “Playboy philosophy?”

Before Playboy, parents warned daughters about all the things a couple of millennia of experience prove man does not want. They told her that the natural man does not want flowers. He does not want dinner. He doesn’t want to waste time with sweet talk. He wants to walk into a bar, get drunk with a compliant woman in a spirit of perfect equality and then jump into bed. He doesn’t even want to waste time with foreplay. If there is a pregnancy, it’s her problem. In short, he wants to sweep into the dustbin of history all those “prudish, Victorian” obstacles.

To prevent that deletion, it was necessary to domesticate the male. He was required to call for a young lady at home – actually get out of his car and knock on the door – where Dad could eyeball him while cleaning his shotgun. Racking a twelve-gauge shotgun, even empty, makes such an authoritative, spiritually satisfying sound.

At dinner, as an expression of respect, he was required to stand up when the lady departed the table for the ladies’ room and again when she returned. And the lady was required to wear an antiquated garment called a dress, a garment with no legs you can see in “Gone With the Wind.” There were separate entrances to cocktail lounges oddly called “Ladies Entrance.”

I realize this next item will be challenged by people who are not as well-versed in history as they should be, but the fact is that ladies back then did not routinely display their belly buttons in public. For his part, the male did not show the different hemispheres in his behind unless he was a plumber, working beneath a sink. And the male alone wore judicious tattoos, usually memorializing his military unit. The dad with the shotgun required that the man bring the lady home at a specified time.

Because of these millennia-tested protections, unauthorized pregnancy was relatively rare. For just one example, we are talking about a time when there was such a lawgiver in most “Negro” homes, with the happy result that the rate of illegitimacy there was lower than it is in white families today. In the relatively unlikely event of such a pregnancy despite these precautions, the intransigent, deflowering male was encouraged to marry in a “shotgun wedding,” most of which, surprisingly, survived. These were just a few aspects of the then cultural matrix...

Be sure to read the rest, and check out his insightful column on Communism and Women, a topic that we have explored thoroughly on this blog, here.

Toku.