The Creature from Jekyll Island!
Check it out.
When you're done there, please visit Goldseek.com and Financial Sense.com for more G Edward Griffin interviews, and check out his webpage here.
Good food for thought for the Freedom Fighting Revolutionary.
Toku.
Monday, October 27, 2008
Saturday, October 25, 2008
Little Known Political Facts.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Seeing as how Election Day is rapidly drawing near, I've decided to post some interesting videos outlining the history of the Republican and the Democratic parties with respect to the protection of the Natural Rights of black Americans, along with some interesting links from Mises.org and ABC's 20/20 program.
The Racist Democratic Party?
Before we go further, I'd like to make some disclosures.
I am a member of the National Rifle Association. I am not a member of the Republican, Democratic, or any other Party. I am not Conservative in the modern sense, nor am I a Liberal, as they are defined today.
I am a Classical Liberal.
By posting these videos, I am not implying that the Republican Party is "better" than the Democratic Party, and I also recognize that there have been considerable shifts in the political philosophies of both parties over time. The Democrats of today are not necessarily the Democrats of yesterday, and vice versa.
However, the ideas and actions of yesterday give birth to the ideas and actions of today. In a sense, they are related, and as such, traces of the ancestors can be witnessed in the thoughts, words, and deeds of the descendants.
As an example, by understanding the background and core philosophy of the Democrats of old, we can understand why the Democratic Party champions certain policies that are ruinous to the health and well-being of black Americans in our modern day.
I also want to stress that, since political parties stand for different things in different eras, it is crucial that the individual should not blindly swear allegiance to any one organization or group.
Each person should remain neutral and dispassionate while carefully examining each candidate and political group to see if their beliefs and objectives are consistent with the Universal Laws that lead to Life, Liberty, Happiness, Justice, and Wealth. If there is harmony, then one should commit themselves to supporting that particular person or group.
I say again, blind allegiance to any political group is dangerous, and must be avoided under all circumstances. This advice is especially intended for Men, because we as a group have no friends supporting our interests, and many detractors who want to strip away the few liberties we have left. Men, at this stage in our history, should consider themselves as minorities desperately in need of protection.
If you picture yourself as a hated and despised minority while watching these videos, Dear Reader, then what these people have to say should become much more relevant to you.
In any event, check 'em out:
This last video may come as a surprise to many... but not to me. My family is very political, with several members being government employees, police officers, and elected officials. My grandfather was the first black Republican elected official in the history of my city. In my generation, my politically connected family members are Democrats who reserve the right to vote Republican when it is in their best interests.
Interesting, is it not? It's amazing what schools don't teach when it comes to political history.
Lincoln vs. The Constitution.
(President Abraham Lincoln)
One of the above videos stated that Lincoln fought the Civil War (or The War Between the States as some call it) in order to end slavery, and because he had a deep and sincere desire to help the black man out. Unfortunately, this was not at all the case [a].
In the interest of accuracy, and a greater desire to understand our Constitutional process, I would like for you to listen to this lecture hosted by Mises.org entitled Lincoln vs. the Constitution.
As the talk explains, among Lincoln's critics of the handling of the war was Lysander Spooner, a famous abolitionist who argued quite eloquently that slavery was unconsitutional. He argued that Lincoln's actions during the war violated the Supreme Law of the Land, and that his commitment to end slavery and secure the liberty of millions was secondary to his desire to strengthen the national government at the expense of the Constitution and the States.
More tellingly, Mr. Spooner wrote an essay entitled, The Constitution of No Authority:
Blasphemy!
Or is it?
The Constitution, a Document of Freedom or Enslavement?
Spooner also points out:
(Robert LeFevre)
Turning back to Mises.org, we find two very interesting lectures by Mr. Robert LeFerve entitled Background to The Constitution and The Constitution Revisited.
Please take the time to listen, as these talks expound on Spooner's general thesis: that the Constitution, and our political order in general, isn't designed to guarantee the Natural Rights of Liberty coupled with Responsibility, but to encumber our freedom and provide ever increasing amounts of power to the central government, which may have been the desire of the Federalist founding fathers from the beginning.
MRAs, in particular, will note how Mr. Lefevre's explanation of how the Constitution's promise of ensuring "domestic tranquility" opens the door for government regulation of the home, via VAWA and all manner of Domestic Violence laws, is right on the money.
Along the same lines, Mises Scholar Thomas Woods explains in Who Killed the Constitution how the document, which is supposed to restrain the government and limit its authority, has been totally ignored or used as a justification for limiting the rights of the People, all the while expanding the power and privilege of Fedgov. It's a short, yet enlightening discussion.
Government Mostly Sucks, and Final Remarks.
As Election 2008 rolls around, we here at Togakure School have to state some unpleasant truths.
A) Government mostly sucks. Please see this video for an excellent example as to why:
B) The Constitution, as it is written, is meaningless in modern American political discourse.
C) The Constitution is a flawed document that allowed our Republic to become an Imperial Democracy (which is now experiencing its Death Throes).
D) Politicians, political parties, Big Businesses, and bankers have sold the American people into financial servitude, covered up their past misdeeds, and have thoroughly confused the electorate to the point where they believe black is white, up is down, and freedom is slavery.
In the final analysis, Men should be very careful as to whom they support when it comes to politics, finance, religion, or any other discipline that requires the work, resources, and allegiance of other men. Many of our thoughts and beliefs, when closely examined, turn out to be the stale and useless facts that others have implanted in our minds while we attended government run schools.
After much reading and meditation on the subject of man, economics, politics, and spirituality, I have come to the conclusion that Men have inalienable and natural rights given to them by God; and all of the Constitutions, laws, political parties, and social customs in the world cannot change this singular reality. In my view, the reason why the People are not free is due to their (intentional and unintentional) ignorance, and that most will not accept the responsibility that the exercise of their awesome powers bring.
Government, to be frank, has gotten too big for its britches. However, instead of abolishing it altogether, I believe that we need to cut it back down to size so that it only handles certain core functions.
These functions are:
A) The protection of life, property (which can never include human beings), and liberty,
B) Enforcement of the responsibilities that come with rights,
C) The establishment of impartial, fair, and open venues to adjudicate disputes with other people and entities, corporate or governmental.
Speaking of these organizations:
No Corporation, no Public Official, and no Governmental unit is above the law, and none of these can escape the review of the People. As a matter of fact, these entities exist to better the lives of men, and only exist at the pleasure of the people.
My attitude is that these groups are subordinate to me and to the public at large and, when they aren't doing what they are supposed to be doing, they should be prepared for harsh criticism, being booted out of office, or seeing me in court as I sue for relief.
I for one refuse to bow down or kiss the wide arses of political hacks and corporate raiders. If anything, government and business should be bending over backwards to be of service to the people, and to justify their very existence.
After a long time of study and life experience, I now understand that the only person on this Earth that is going to look out for my best interests is Yours Truly. Looking to politicians, presidential candidates, and CEOs to solve all of my problems is just asking for trouble, in my view.
No matter what happens this election, please recognize that Power serves those who are awake, aware, and knowledgeable. An enlightened and knowledgeable citizenry can amend or write a new Constitution that would, in precise and unalterable terms, seal the Demonic Beast of government back to the Fourth Dimension where it rightfully belongs.
New and better ways of appointing Representatives, Executives, and Judges can be devised. The rights and responsibilities of all people can be protected and enforced. Correct economic, monetary, and fiscal processes can be written into a new Supreme Law of the Land that will virtually ensure that the nation enjoys an unparalleled standard of living.
It can be done, and it's not impossible if we as a nation are willing to learn from our mistakes, do the right things, and avoid incorrect or ineffective adventures like the plague.
All of this can be done IF the masses become aware of the powers they posses, STOP giving their power away to those who would do them harm, and take action to insure that favorable developments come to pass.
Toku out.
Seeing as how Election Day is rapidly drawing near, I've decided to post some interesting videos outlining the history of the Republican and the Democratic parties with respect to the protection of the Natural Rights of black Americans, along with some interesting links from Mises.org and ABC's 20/20 program.
The Racist Democratic Party?
Before we go further, I'd like to make some disclosures.
I am a member of the National Rifle Association. I am not a member of the Republican, Democratic, or any other Party. I am not Conservative in the modern sense, nor am I a Liberal, as they are defined today.
I am a Classical Liberal.
By posting these videos, I am not implying that the Republican Party is "better" than the Democratic Party, and I also recognize that there have been considerable shifts in the political philosophies of both parties over time. The Democrats of today are not necessarily the Democrats of yesterday, and vice versa.
However, the ideas and actions of yesterday give birth to the ideas and actions of today. In a sense, they are related, and as such, traces of the ancestors can be witnessed in the thoughts, words, and deeds of the descendants.
As an example, by understanding the background and core philosophy of the Democrats of old, we can understand why the Democratic Party champions certain policies that are ruinous to the health and well-being of black Americans in our modern day.
I also want to stress that, since political parties stand for different things in different eras, it is crucial that the individual should not blindly swear allegiance to any one organization or group.
Each person should remain neutral and dispassionate while carefully examining each candidate and political group to see if their beliefs and objectives are consistent with the Universal Laws that lead to Life, Liberty, Happiness, Justice, and Wealth. If there is harmony, then one should commit themselves to supporting that particular person or group.
I say again, blind allegiance to any political group is dangerous, and must be avoided under all circumstances. This advice is especially intended for Men, because we as a group have no friends supporting our interests, and many detractors who want to strip away the few liberties we have left. Men, at this stage in our history, should consider themselves as minorities desperately in need of protection.
If you picture yourself as a hated and despised minority while watching these videos, Dear Reader, then what these people have to say should become much more relevant to you.
In any event, check 'em out:
This last video may come as a surprise to many... but not to me. My family is very political, with several members being government employees, police officers, and elected officials. My grandfather was the first black Republican elected official in the history of my city. In my generation, my politically connected family members are Democrats who reserve the right to vote Republican when it is in their best interests.
Interesting, is it not? It's amazing what schools don't teach when it comes to political history.
Lincoln vs. The Constitution.
(President Abraham Lincoln)
One of the above videos stated that Lincoln fought the Civil War (or The War Between the States as some call it) in order to end slavery, and because he had a deep and sincere desire to help the black man out. Unfortunately, this was not at all the case [a].
In the interest of accuracy, and a greater desire to understand our Constitutional process, I would like for you to listen to this lecture hosted by Mises.org entitled Lincoln vs. the Constitution.
As the talk explains, among Lincoln's critics of the handling of the war was Lysander Spooner, a famous abolitionist who argued quite eloquently that slavery was unconsitutional. He argued that Lincoln's actions during the war violated the Supreme Law of the Land, and that his commitment to end slavery and secure the liberty of millions was secondary to his desire to strengthen the national government at the expense of the Constitution and the States.
More tellingly, Mr. Spooner wrote an essay entitled, The Constitution of No Authority:
The Constitution has no inherent authority or obligation. It has no authority or obligation at all, unless as a contract between man and man. And it does not so much as even purport to be a contract between persons now existing. It purports, at most, to be only a contract between persons living eighty years ago.
And it can be supposed to have been a contract then only between persons who had already come to years of discretion, so as to be competent to make reasonable and obligatory contracts. Furthermore, we know, historically, that only a small portion even of the people then existing were consulted on the subject, or asked, or permitted to express either their consent or dissent in any formal manner. Those persons, if any, who did give their consent formally, are all dead now. Most of them have been dead forty, fifty, sixty, or seventy years.
And the constitution, so far as it was their contract, died with them. They had no natural power or right to make it obligatory upon their children. It is not only plainly impossible, in the nature of things, that they could bind their posterity, but they did not even attempt to bind them. That is to say, the instrument does not purport to be an agreement between any body but “the people” then existing; nor does it, either expressly or impliedly, assert any right, power, or disposition, on their part, to bind anybody but themselves...
Blasphemy!
Or is it?
The Constitution, a Document of Freedom or Enslavement?
Spooner also points out:
... It is no exaggeration, but a literal truth, to say that, by the Constitution – not as I interpret it, but as it is interpreted by those who pretend to administer it – the properties, liberties, and lives of the entire people of the United States are surrendered unreservedly into the hands of men who, it is provided by the Constitution itself, shall never be “questioned” as to any disposal they make of them...
...The Constitution itself, then, being of no authority, on what authority does our government practically rest? On what ground can those who pretend to administer it, claim the right to seize men's property, to restrain them of their natural liberty of action, industry, and trade, and to kill all who deny their authority to dispose of men's properties, liberties, and lives at their pleasure or discretion?...
... The whole affair (speaking of the Rothschilds and other powerful Money Lenders who financed the Civil War for profit - Toku), on the part of those who furnished the money, has been, and now is, a deliberate scheme of robbery and murder; not merely to monopolize the markets of the South, but also to monopolize the currency, and thus control the industry and trade, and thus plunder and enslave the laborers, of both North and South. And Congress and the president are today the merest tools for these purposes.
They are obliged to be, for they know that their own power, as rulers, so-called, is at an end, the moment their credit with the blood-money loan-mongers fails. They are like a bankrupt in the hands of an extortioner. They dare not say nay to any demand made upon them. And to hide at once, if possible, both their servility and crimes, they attempt to divert public attention, by crying out that they have “Abolished Slavery!” That they have “Saved the Country!” That they have “Preserved our Glorious Union!” and that, in now paying the “National Debt,” as they call it (as if the people themselves, all of them who are to be taxed for its payment, had really and voluntarily joined in contracting it), they are simply “Maintaining the National Honor!”
"By maintaining the national honor,” they mean simply that they themselves, open robbers and murderers, assume to be the nation, and will keep faith with those who lend them the money necessary to enable them to crush the great body of the people under their feet; and will faithfully appropriate, from the proceeds of their future robberies and murders, enough to pay all their loans, principal and interest.
The pretense that the “abolition of slavery” was either a motive or justification for the war, is a fraud of the same character with that of “maintaining the national honor.”
Who, but such usurpers, robbers, and murderers as they, ever established slavery? Or what government, except one resting upon the sword, like the one we now have, was ever capable of maintaining slavery? And why did these men abolish slavery? Not from any love of liberty in general – not as an act of justice to the black man himself, but only “as a war measure,” and because they wanted his assistance, and that of his friends, in carrying on the war they had undertaken for maintaining and intensifying that political, commercial, and industrial slavery, to which they have subjected the great body of the people, both black and white (see here, here, and here for more information on white slavery - Toku). And yet these imposters now cry out that they have abolished the chattel slavery of the black man – although that was not the motive of the war – as if they thought they could thereby conceal, atone for, or justify that other slavery which they were fighting to perpetuate, and to render more rigorous and inexorable than it ever was before.
There was no difference of principle – but only of degree – between the slavery they boast they have abolished, and the slavery they were fighting to preserve; for all restraints upon men’s natural liberty, not necessary for the simple maintenance of justice, are of the nature of slavery, and differ from each other only in degree.
If their object had really been to abolish slavery, or maintain liberty or justice generally, they had only to say: All, whether white or black, who want the protection of this government, shall have it; and all who do not want it, will be left in peace, so long as they leave us in peace. Had they said this, slavery would necessarily have been abolished at once; the war would have been saved; and a thousand times nobler union than we have ever had would have been the result.
It would have been a voluntary union of free men; such a union as will one day exist among all men, the world over, if the several nations, so called, shall ever get rid of the usurpers, robbers, and murderers, called governments, that now plunder, enslave, and destroy them...
... Inasmuch as the Constitution was never signed, nor agreed to, by anybody, as a contract, and therefore never bound anybody, and is now binding upon nobody; and is, moreover, such an one as no people can ever hereafter be expected to consent to, except as they may be forced to do so at the point of the bayonet, it is perhaps of no importance what its true legal meaning, as a contract, is. Nevertheless, the writer thinks it proper to say that, in his opinion, the Constitution is no such instrument as it has generally been assumed to be; but that by false interpretations, and naked usurpations, the government has been made in practice a very widely, and almost wholly, different thing from what the Constitution itself purports to authorize. He has heretofore written much, and could write much more, to prove that such is the truth. But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain – that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist...
(Robert LeFevre)
Turning back to Mises.org, we find two very interesting lectures by Mr. Robert LeFerve entitled Background to The Constitution and The Constitution Revisited.
Please take the time to listen, as these talks expound on Spooner's general thesis: that the Constitution, and our political order in general, isn't designed to guarantee the Natural Rights of Liberty coupled with Responsibility, but to encumber our freedom and provide ever increasing amounts of power to the central government, which may have been the desire of the Federalist founding fathers from the beginning.
MRAs, in particular, will note how Mr. Lefevre's explanation of how the Constitution's promise of ensuring "domestic tranquility" opens the door for government regulation of the home, via VAWA and all manner of Domestic Violence laws, is right on the money.
Along the same lines, Mises Scholar Thomas Woods explains in Who Killed the Constitution how the document, which is supposed to restrain the government and limit its authority, has been totally ignored or used as a justification for limiting the rights of the People, all the while expanding the power and privilege of Fedgov. It's a short, yet enlightening discussion.
Government Mostly Sucks, and Final Remarks.
As Election 2008 rolls around, we here at Togakure School have to state some unpleasant truths.
A) Government mostly sucks. Please see this video for an excellent example as to why:
B) The Constitution, as it is written, is meaningless in modern American political discourse.
C) The Constitution is a flawed document that allowed our Republic to become an Imperial Democracy (which is now experiencing its Death Throes).
D) Politicians, political parties, Big Businesses, and bankers have sold the American people into financial servitude, covered up their past misdeeds, and have thoroughly confused the electorate to the point where they believe black is white, up is down, and freedom is slavery.
In the final analysis, Men should be very careful as to whom they support when it comes to politics, finance, religion, or any other discipline that requires the work, resources, and allegiance of other men. Many of our thoughts and beliefs, when closely examined, turn out to be the stale and useless facts that others have implanted in our minds while we attended government run schools.
After much reading and meditation on the subject of man, economics, politics, and spirituality, I have come to the conclusion that Men have inalienable and natural rights given to them by God; and all of the Constitutions, laws, political parties, and social customs in the world cannot change this singular reality. In my view, the reason why the People are not free is due to their (intentional and unintentional) ignorance, and that most will not accept the responsibility that the exercise of their awesome powers bring.
Government, to be frank, has gotten too big for its britches. However, instead of abolishing it altogether, I believe that we need to cut it back down to size so that it only handles certain core functions.
These functions are:
A) The protection of life, property (which can never include human beings), and liberty,
B) Enforcement of the responsibilities that come with rights,
C) The establishment of impartial, fair, and open venues to adjudicate disputes with other people and entities, corporate or governmental.
Speaking of these organizations:
No Corporation, no Public Official, and no Governmental unit is above the law, and none of these can escape the review of the People. As a matter of fact, these entities exist to better the lives of men, and only exist at the pleasure of the people.
My attitude is that these groups are subordinate to me and to the public at large and, when they aren't doing what they are supposed to be doing, they should be prepared for harsh criticism, being booted out of office, or seeing me in court as I sue for relief.
I for one refuse to bow down or kiss the wide arses of political hacks and corporate raiders. If anything, government and business should be bending over backwards to be of service to the people, and to justify their very existence.
After a long time of study and life experience, I now understand that the only person on this Earth that is going to look out for my best interests is Yours Truly. Looking to politicians, presidential candidates, and CEOs to solve all of my problems is just asking for trouble, in my view.
No matter what happens this election, please recognize that Power serves those who are awake, aware, and knowledgeable. An enlightened and knowledgeable citizenry can amend or write a new Constitution that would, in precise and unalterable terms, seal the Demonic Beast of government back to the Fourth Dimension where it rightfully belongs.
New and better ways of appointing Representatives, Executives, and Judges can be devised. The rights and responsibilities of all people can be protected and enforced. Correct economic, monetary, and fiscal processes can be written into a new Supreme Law of the Land that will virtually ensure that the nation enjoys an unparalleled standard of living.
It can be done, and it's not impossible if we as a nation are willing to learn from our mistakes, do the right things, and avoid incorrect or ineffective adventures like the plague.
All of this can be done IF the masses become aware of the powers they posses, STOP giving their power away to those who would do them harm, and take action to insure that favorable developments come to pass.
Toku out.
Monday, October 20, 2008
Sgt Willie P: Breaking it down!!
Love him or hate him:
Willie P's developed into quite the MRA.
Check it out.
Willie P's developed into quite the MRA.
Check it out.
Sex, Sensibility, and Real Street Stories.
Greetings Sports fans!
I hope that everyone is doing well. As usual, I have a lot to say, so let's get to it!
Black Single Mothers: Public Enemy Number One.
Before I speak my mind, let's take minute to listen to Sarge WP's comments on the subject.
It ain't no secret that the black American family in America has been completely destroyed [1][2][3]. While some of you might think that I am overreacting, I'm quite serious when I state that the black American family unit is dead and buried, never to return.
What else can be said when 70% of a people's children are born outside of marriage?
As Sarge explains in the Youtube vid, cultural norms (or lack thereof) are passed on from parent to child. In most societies, the basic family pattern consists of the father, his wife (or wives), and his children. The ideal feminist Matriarchal family [4][5] unit consisting of mothers and children only, is extremely rare and politically, culturally, and economically inferior when compared to families where fathers are present and involved in the lives of their children. History has proven that societies where marriage (and married fathers) is the norm far surpass those that have a weak marriage culture whenever the two come into close contact.
The mightiest and most prosperous civilizations always had strong marriage cultures, and vigorous male involvement in all aspects of civil, religious, and family life.
There is documented evidence that pre-historical African civilizations were strongly matriarchal (see Massey), in terms of lineage, theology, and political structure. And while many African cultures (certainly not all, as Africa is a huge continent with many religious and cultural variables) maintain the trappings of Matriarchy, one would be hard pressed to find the idealized feminist family unit consisting of solely mothers and their offspring; and marriage as an institution is the [6][7][8] dominant form of family organization throughout Africa and the rest of the world.
(Traditional South African Wedding)
(Traditional Village Wedding)
It should be understood that the African woman has always held a place of honor and wields considerable influence in family affairs (Some have suggested that this cultural trait has been leveraged by feminists in modern times for maximum destructive effect, a plausible idea as feminists just love to exploit a society's norms or shortcomings in order to achieve their goals).
However some feminists and other misguided commentators have ignorantly argued that the American social paradigm, in which black women bear and raise the vast majority of children outside of wedlock, and use the power of the State, and the court of Anti-Male public opinion to push fathers out of their children's lives, is nothing more than an "expression of holistic, natural, and traditional African culture" or some other pretentious claim.
To that idea I say... BULLSHIT. The social structure of 2008 America, that has been fueled by feminism and welfarism, is in complete and utter disharmony with the traditional and modern African mind.
Sadly, many in the black community, thanks to a incompetent and corrupt black elite, pro-feminist propaganda in the popular media, and the traditional expectation that the black woman wears the pants in any given situation, have come to believe that having a 70% out-of-wedlock birth rate is right and natural; nevermind that some of the most powerful blacks in America are married and live a lifestyle that the average 'Hood dweller would never even imagine is possible. And, worst of all, these highly successful people not only denounce black men as a group for their "irresponsibility" and their failure "to do tha right thing", they also do absolutely nothing to combat the prevailing attitude amongst the black masses that "marriage is for white people."
In my humble opinion, the whole situation smacks of one rule for me, and another for thee!
Now with all that said, let me tell you a story about what black single mothers, drenched in the toxic waste of black feminism, high on Misandry, and backed up by the full force of the State, teach their daughters on a daily basis. Hopefully, by the end of this morality play, you will understand and take heed when I say that dating single mothers, divorced women, or the children of said women is an absolute No No! Women like these have, more often than not, been taught from an early age to hate men and make their lives miserable.
And with the full power of the State at their command, they can make your life very miserable indeed.
Marriage to such a woman will most likely turn out to be a complete MISSION FAILURE...
It was a quiet day at the office, and Toku was putting the finishing touches on his Spending Projections Excel spreadsheet.
The door suddenly opened, and Renee swept into the office, with her six year old daughter in tow.
Toku, having had his fair share of negative experiences with children that have no respect for men, or no home training to speak of, focused on his work and shut them out of his mind completely as Renee introduced her child to the other women in the office.
While making nice-nice and receiving candy and presents from the office ladies, one co-worker, a devout Christian police officer and mother of five kids, spoke to the child in a conspiratorial whisper:
After more pleasantries (and treats) were exchanged, Renee came to my desk and spoke those dreaded words...
Renee:
Me:
Mikailah:
Me, thinking to myself:
** Sigh ** Another child of a single mother who has no respect for her elders, who will grow up hating men for the rest of her life, will probably get pregnant and become a statistic before she graduates high school, and will most likely drag whatever man is stupid enough to impregnate her through the child support court for the remainder of his working life.
Never fails!
Renee: (Complete silence. No reprimand or apology for allowing her daughter to talk to a 30 year old man like I just graduated from kindergarten the day before yesterday.)
After a few uncomfortable moments of silence, I turned back to my work and pretended that the exchange never happened. All the women in the office grinned and were very pleased that Mikailah put another damnable man in his subserviant place. You go girl!!
Renee, remembering that she had a child support hearing to attend at 2:30, starts out of the door.
Renee:
Child: Taking a last glance at all the women in the office and ignoring my existence:
All co-workers except me: "BYE Honey! Good luck with your hearing! I hope your no-good bastard of an ex-husband gets his ass locked up this time!"
Renee and child smiling and utterly content, walked out of the office.
Toku saved his completed worksheet, and contemplated the difficulties that lie ahead for both Renee and her daughter...
Please note, Dear Reader, that this is based on my real life experiences, for what it's worth.
Because I work with an office full of women, I hear EVERYTHING. The level of Misandry is unbelievable, but it is especially bad when the divorced single mothers open their mouths to spew their hatred against men, which happens a lot.
When it comes to what they teach their children about men... think of Parental Alienation Syndrome on steroids!
Sadly, the real losers in all this are the daughters of single mothers. Every one I have ever met showed nothing but disrespect and contempt for men; much of it learned from their parental unit. They are taught, from an early age, not to marry, not to show respect towards elder men, not to believe that a man could ever do anything good, or that a man could hold their best interests at heart.
Nor are they taught how to distinguish the good guys from the bad boy thugs. All men are equally bad in their eyes; and so they learn too late that there is a difference. Or, they mistake or mistrust a man's kindness, so they equate kindness with weakness and torture the poor schmoe in a multitude of ways.
In other words, the wellspring of acceptance, compassion, and kindness, that every child starts out with, is poisoned to the point where hostility towards men and marriage becomes second nature.
And because of this training, many black women grow up fearful and hostile towards men. They shun marriage and traditional family values; and are utterly toxic on a mental, physical, and spiritual level. Not to say that all women are like this of course, but I would be comfortable in asserting that 80% of the population are not worth dealing with, and are best avoided by men seeking a loving lifelong companion.
Just in case you want a second opinion, please listen as this gentlemen explains that this toxic attitude is one of the biggest reasons why black men avoid black women.
Again, I must stress that women of African extraction are not inherently evil. Far from it. Those of you who have been with black women born and raised OUTSIDE OF THIS COUNTRY know what I'm talking about.
And I'm not saying that 100% of black American women are rude and uncouth. There ARE good black women out there. But like I've said before, 80% of black American women are simply not pleasant to be around... much less mate, marry, and raise children with. As a matter of fact, the wrong woman is definitely hazardous to your health.
The main issue here is that post feminist black American women have been taught, from childhood, to be totally unpleasant at best, and downright violent at worst. And keep in mind that her cultural conditioning is accepted and encouraged by both law and custom. So-called black leaders, such as Cosby, Obama, and others, aid and abet this bad behavior. And woe be unto the innocent man who attempts to change her... restraining orders and domestic violence charges await the foolish one who dares to resist her tyranny, right, wrong, or indifferent.
So, to bring the point home...
a) The death of the American black family has created a vacuum
b) The new cultural norm is single parenthood for black women (aided, abetted, and subsidized by Fedgov and other government entities)
c) The daughters of single mothers are, from an early age, instilled with an attitude of misandry and hostility against marriage
d) Which leads to the continuation of the cycle of out of wedlock childbirth in the black community
e) Which impoverishes and weakens the black American community as a whole leading to more crime, more poverty, and more dependence on government and so-called leaders who are setting up their followers for even greater failure and misery.
Although there are many brave souls who are challenging this vicious circle, one wonders how successful they will be in raising the consciousnesses of the people. And so, you, Dear Reader, should take responsibility to change this situation in your own life, and follow a two pronged plan for effecting mass change.
Unless or until cultural attitudes and laws are reformed to protect and uphold the rights and responsibilities of men, the best thing guys of all races can do to protect themselves is to not meet, mate with, or marry Westernized, feminized women, of any color, and actively encourage their male peers to follow their example.
Blog, write, record Youtube videos, rap songs or poems... do whatever you gotta do to get the word out.
Once this is done, then you can activate the second part of the plan. Since the Awakened man understands that there is a whole wide world of women that are traditionally minded, incredibly kind, in great physical condition, and are more than happy to spend quality time with him, he will then devote his time and energy to seeking out these women instead of setting himself up for failure trying to force American women to change their ways, or even worse, sacrificing himself on the alter of Misandry in a vain attempt to earn their respect and their devotion.
Ultimately, you can't control what women do... but you can always control what you do. You have all the powers of Creation at your command, and you can always choose to Go Your Own Way.
Those who understand this power would change up the familiar saying of "Out of Sight, Out of Mind" to "Out of Mind, Out of Sight." As soon as you decide to honor the request of today's Western woman by staying as far away from her as possible, and choosing to seek out companionship in greener pastures, you are already well on your way.
I know that this can work for you, because it worked for me... big time.
And while obstacles, such as the unconstitutional IMBRA law, seek to keep American men alone and unhappy, there are ways to circumvent such petty regulations in order to find the woman of your dreams.
Or, if you are so inclined, you can travel to exotic destinations and rent the services of a professional until your heart is content.
There is happiness to be found in this world... but the only way you can be successful is to do the correct things, and commit yourself to the right people. And those who KNOW what is right, have to do what is right; even when it is difficult or unpleasant, even if 80% of the world is completely dead set against it.
And from where I'm sitting, marriage and relationships with thoroughly Feminized women, of any color or creed, will not lead to success... only to pain and hardship.
Take heed.
Togakure School: A Day in the Life.
Here at Togakure School, we tend to stick to the hard facts, and shy away from using our life experiences to support our ideals. However, I wanted to take a time out for a minute in order to share this bit of everyday life with you.
So what's yer point? you ask.
The moral here, Dear Reader, is manifold:
a) There are women in the world who love, respect, and appreciate their men enough to support him in a cheerful and loving manner.
b) There are women in the world who think of others instead of thinking only about themselves and their own comfort.
c) There are women in the world who understand that the man that loved them enough to marry them usually has their best interests at heart.
d) There are women in the world who fit the definition of the words wife and helpmate.
American women, in their mad dash to destroy Patriarchy in particular and men in general, have lost sight of the fact that a man, if properly appreciated and encouraged, will move heaven and earth to provide for her and her offspring in a manner that no other institution, such as Fedgov, or the local domestic violence shelter, could ever hope to match.
And as a consequence: Man, woman, child and society are much better off.
By sharing with you a bit of my personal life, I want to convey to my readers the happiness, warmth, kindness and loyalty that the cultivated man and the well groomed woman bring to the table.
Most of all, I want men to know that the woman of their dreams does exist. But unfortunately, thanks to insane feminist brainwashing, the man who seeks a lifelong mate will need to travel far in order to meet her. Women of my wife's caliber are incredibly few and far between in the Feminized West. If you should have such a woman on your team, be sure to take the time to appreciate her.
A real woman is a treasure indeed. Good luck gents, and good hunting!
Polygyny and why it's good for you!
Speaking of wives... Men over the centuries have discovered that sometimes, two (or more) wives are better than one.
An African proverb states:
While I've explained, in detail, my reasons for supporting the ancient practice of Polygyny elsewhere, I do want to take a few moments and share some additional information with you, my Valuable Reader.
(One of the fringe benefits of multiple wives...)
From the National Business Review:
Interesting indeed.
We already know that marriage increases a man's lifespan, and we also know that sexual activity is essential for good mental and physical well-being, in addition to the biological importance of regular sexual activity for men in general.
So then, is a man more likely to have frequent "relations" in the confines of a monogamous or a polygamous marriage? The jury seems to be out on this question, but, as I argued previously, there may be a time in a married relationship when the wife is unable or unwilling to meet the man's very real sexual desires. In that case then, is a man justified if he takes another wife or concubine? And more importantly, should society punish a man who takes a mistress, another wife, or a concubine in his hour of need?
If we look at history, tradition, and religion, cultures across space and time have answered that it is permissible to take additional wives, and no, men should not be punished in draconian fashion for doing so. But in modern day America, the polygamous option, which has benefits (and drawbacks) for both men and women, has been forbidden by Supreme Court fiat.
Now isn't it strange, Dear Reader, that the right of men to take more than one wife, and to even be a part of monogamous married life, has been stripped away by the same corrupt institution?
Have not the Courts, who have ruled that Men are subject to child support slave labor, also decided that adults cannot choose to freely enter into polygamous unions?
Does anyone else see a pattern here?
In my opinion, if legal age, consenting adults wish to enter into polygamous unions, then it is their right to do so, although I do support limits to the practice for the sake of social harmony.
After all, Three's Company, four is a crowd!
In any event, I don't claim that polygamy, as a system, is superior to monogamy or celibacy. What I am saying however, is that for certain individuals, it can be the right lifestyle choice, and to prevent free people from exercising their rights by government decree is just as bad as when the rights of men are stripped away from them by the ignorant majority.
For me, in the final analysis, it's the principle of freedom coupled with responsibility that matters.
Togakure sez...
Be sure to check back next time as we discuss Rugged Men, womanly women, and why being a Punk is bad for your social life!
Peace.
I hope that everyone is doing well. As usual, I have a lot to say, so let's get to it!
Black Single Mothers: Public Enemy Number One.
Before I speak my mind, let's take minute to listen to Sarge WP's comments on the subject.
It ain't no secret that the black American family in America has been completely destroyed [1][2][3]. While some of you might think that I am overreacting, I'm quite serious when I state that the black American family unit is dead and buried, never to return.
What else can be said when 70% of a people's children are born outside of marriage?
As Sarge explains in the Youtube vid, cultural norms (or lack thereof) are passed on from parent to child. In most societies, the basic family pattern consists of the father, his wife (or wives), and his children. The ideal feminist Matriarchal family [4][5] unit consisting of mothers and children only, is extremely rare and politically, culturally, and economically inferior when compared to families where fathers are present and involved in the lives of their children. History has proven that societies where marriage (and married fathers) is the norm far surpass those that have a weak marriage culture whenever the two come into close contact.
The mightiest and most prosperous civilizations always had strong marriage cultures, and vigorous male involvement in all aspects of civil, religious, and family life.
There is documented evidence that pre-historical African civilizations were strongly matriarchal (see Massey), in terms of lineage, theology, and political structure. And while many African cultures (certainly not all, as Africa is a huge continent with many religious and cultural variables) maintain the trappings of Matriarchy, one would be hard pressed to find the idealized feminist family unit consisting of solely mothers and their offspring; and marriage as an institution is the [6][7][8] dominant form of family organization throughout Africa and the rest of the world.
(Traditional South African Wedding)
(Traditional Village Wedding)
It should be understood that the African woman has always held a place of honor and wields considerable influence in family affairs (Some have suggested that this cultural trait has been leveraged by feminists in modern times for maximum destructive effect, a plausible idea as feminists just love to exploit a society's norms or shortcomings in order to achieve their goals).
However some feminists and other misguided commentators have ignorantly argued that the American social paradigm, in which black women bear and raise the vast majority of children outside of wedlock, and use the power of the State, and the court of Anti-Male public opinion to push fathers out of their children's lives, is nothing more than an "expression of holistic, natural, and traditional African culture" or some other pretentious claim.
To that idea I say... BULLSHIT. The social structure of 2008 America, that has been fueled by feminism and welfarism, is in complete and utter disharmony with the traditional and modern African mind.
Sadly, many in the black community, thanks to a incompetent and corrupt black elite, pro-feminist propaganda in the popular media, and the traditional expectation that the black woman wears the pants in any given situation, have come to believe that having a 70% out-of-wedlock birth rate is right and natural; nevermind that some of the most powerful blacks in America are married and live a lifestyle that the average 'Hood dweller would never even imagine is possible. And, worst of all, these highly successful people not only denounce black men as a group for their "irresponsibility" and their failure "to do tha right thing", they also do absolutely nothing to combat the prevailing attitude amongst the black masses that "marriage is for white people."
In my humble opinion, the whole situation smacks of one rule for me, and another for thee!
Now with all that said, let me tell you a story about what black single mothers, drenched in the toxic waste of black feminism, high on Misandry, and backed up by the full force of the State, teach their daughters on a daily basis. Hopefully, by the end of this morality play, you will understand and take heed when I say that dating single mothers, divorced women, or the children of said women is an absolute No No! Women like these have, more often than not, been taught from an early age to hate men and make their lives miserable.
And with the full power of the State at their command, they can make your life very miserable indeed.
Marriage to such a woman will most likely turn out to be a complete MISSION FAILURE...
It was a quiet day at the office, and Toku was putting the finishing touches on his Spending Projections Excel spreadsheet.
The door suddenly opened, and Renee swept into the office, with her six year old daughter in tow.
Toku, having had his fair share of negative experiences with children that have no respect for men, or no home training to speak of, focused on his work and shut them out of his mind completely as Renee introduced her child to the other women in the office.
While making nice-nice and receiving candy and presents from the office ladies, one co-worker, a devout Christian police officer and mother of five kids, spoke to the child in a conspiratorial whisper:
"Here's some candy for you... just for little girls. If a boy tried to get some candy from me, I'd arrest him! But it's ok for you because we don't arrest little girls, only boys..."
After more pleasantries (and treats) were exchanged, Renee came to my desk and spoke those dreaded words...
Renee:
"Say Hi to Toku Mikailah!"
Me:
"Hi Mikailah, how are you?"
Mikailah:
"Get away from me! I don't like stupid boys!!!"
Me, thinking to myself:
** Sigh ** Another child of a single mother who has no respect for her elders, who will grow up hating men for the rest of her life, will probably get pregnant and become a statistic before she graduates high school, and will most likely drag whatever man is stupid enough to impregnate her through the child support court for the remainder of his working life.
Never fails!
Renee: (Complete silence. No reprimand or apology for allowing her daughter to talk to a 30 year old man like I just graduated from kindergarten the day before yesterday.)
After a few uncomfortable moments of silence, I turned back to my work and pretended that the exchange never happened. All the women in the office grinned and were very pleased that Mikailah put another damnable man in his subserviant place. You go girl!!
Renee, remembering that she had a child support hearing to attend at 2:30, starts out of the door.
Renee:
"Say bye to everyone!"
Child: Taking a last glance at all the women in the office and ignoring my existence:
"Bye!!"
All co-workers except me: "BYE Honey! Good luck with your hearing! I hope your no-good bastard of an ex-husband gets his ass locked up this time!"
Renee and child smiling and utterly content, walked out of the office.
Toku saved his completed worksheet, and contemplated the difficulties that lie ahead for both Renee and her daughter...
Please note, Dear Reader, that this is based on my real life experiences, for what it's worth.
Because I work with an office full of women, I hear EVERYTHING. The level of Misandry is unbelievable, but it is especially bad when the divorced single mothers open their mouths to spew their hatred against men, which happens a lot.
When it comes to what they teach their children about men... think of Parental Alienation Syndrome on steroids!
Sadly, the real losers in all this are the daughters of single mothers. Every one I have ever met showed nothing but disrespect and contempt for men; much of it learned from their parental unit. They are taught, from an early age, not to marry, not to show respect towards elder men, not to believe that a man could ever do anything good, or that a man could hold their best interests at heart.
Nor are they taught how to distinguish the good guys from the bad boy thugs. All men are equally bad in their eyes; and so they learn too late that there is a difference. Or, they mistake or mistrust a man's kindness, so they equate kindness with weakness and torture the poor schmoe in a multitude of ways.
In other words, the wellspring of acceptance, compassion, and kindness, that every child starts out with, is poisoned to the point where hostility towards men and marriage becomes second nature.
And because of this training, many black women grow up fearful and hostile towards men. They shun marriage and traditional family values; and are utterly toxic on a mental, physical, and spiritual level. Not to say that all women are like this of course, but I would be comfortable in asserting that 80% of the population are not worth dealing with, and are best avoided by men seeking a loving lifelong companion.
Just in case you want a second opinion, please listen as this gentlemen explains that this toxic attitude is one of the biggest reasons why black men avoid black women.
Again, I must stress that women of African extraction are not inherently evil. Far from it. Those of you who have been with black women born and raised OUTSIDE OF THIS COUNTRY know what I'm talking about.
And I'm not saying that 100% of black American women are rude and uncouth. There ARE good black women out there. But like I've said before, 80% of black American women are simply not pleasant to be around... much less mate, marry, and raise children with. As a matter of fact, the wrong woman is definitely hazardous to your health.
The main issue here is that post feminist black American women have been taught, from childhood, to be totally unpleasant at best, and downright violent at worst. And keep in mind that her cultural conditioning is accepted and encouraged by both law and custom. So-called black leaders, such as Cosby, Obama, and others, aid and abet this bad behavior. And woe be unto the innocent man who attempts to change her... restraining orders and domestic violence charges await the foolish one who dares to resist her tyranny, right, wrong, or indifferent.
So, to bring the point home...
a) The death of the American black family has created a vacuum
b) The new cultural norm is single parenthood for black women (aided, abetted, and subsidized by Fedgov and other government entities)
c) The daughters of single mothers are, from an early age, instilled with an attitude of misandry and hostility against marriage
d) Which leads to the continuation of the cycle of out of wedlock childbirth in the black community
e) Which impoverishes and weakens the black American community as a whole leading to more crime, more poverty, and more dependence on government and so-called leaders who are setting up their followers for even greater failure and misery.
Although there are many brave souls who are challenging this vicious circle, one wonders how successful they will be in raising the consciousnesses of the people. And so, you, Dear Reader, should take responsibility to change this situation in your own life, and follow a two pronged plan for effecting mass change.
Unless or until cultural attitudes and laws are reformed to protect and uphold the rights and responsibilities of men, the best thing guys of all races can do to protect themselves is to not meet, mate with, or marry Westernized, feminized women, of any color, and actively encourage their male peers to follow their example.
Blog, write, record Youtube videos, rap songs or poems... do whatever you gotta do to get the word out.
Once this is done, then you can activate the second part of the plan. Since the Awakened man understands that there is a whole wide world of women that are traditionally minded, incredibly kind, in great physical condition, and are more than happy to spend quality time with him, he will then devote his time and energy to seeking out these women instead of setting himself up for failure trying to force American women to change their ways, or even worse, sacrificing himself on the alter of Misandry in a vain attempt to earn their respect and their devotion.
Ultimately, you can't control what women do... but you can always control what you do. You have all the powers of Creation at your command, and you can always choose to Go Your Own Way.
Those who understand this power would change up the familiar saying of "Out of Sight, Out of Mind" to "Out of Mind, Out of Sight." As soon as you decide to honor the request of today's Western woman by staying as far away from her as possible, and choosing to seek out companionship in greener pastures, you are already well on your way.
I know that this can work for you, because it worked for me... big time.
And while obstacles, such as the unconstitutional IMBRA law, seek to keep American men alone and unhappy, there are ways to circumvent such petty regulations in order to find the woman of your dreams.
Or, if you are so inclined, you can travel to exotic destinations and rent the services of a professional until your heart is content.
There is happiness to be found in this world... but the only way you can be successful is to do the correct things, and commit yourself to the right people. And those who KNOW what is right, have to do what is right; even when it is difficult or unpleasant, even if 80% of the world is completely dead set against it.
And from where I'm sitting, marriage and relationships with thoroughly Feminized women, of any color or creed, will not lead to success... only to pain and hardship.
Take heed.
Togakure School: A Day in the Life.
Here at Togakure School, we tend to stick to the hard facts, and shy away from using our life experiences to support our ideals. However, I wanted to take a time out for a minute in order to share this bit of everyday life with you.
As I was driving home from a hard day's work, I began to catalog a list of items I would need for various projects. If my speculations paid off, myself, wife, and cub would be in a very comfortable position in the face of looming economic hard times.
Two new laptops, a 500GB hard drive, a Nintendo Wii...
You get the idea.
So, I says to myself, the quickest way to raise the needed cash would be to get a part time job and earn the money (as I've adopted a cash vs. credit purchase policy). I figured I could work a few months, get all the equipment I needed, and quit shortly thereafter.
Good plan, I said to myself.
As I walked in my front door, I saw my wife sitting in a classical Seiza pose, as Japanese girls often do. She uttered words of welcome, accompanied by a deep bow. I returned her bow, took off my shoes at the door, sat down cross-legged beside her, and informed her of my intention to find part time work.
My wife, being the kind hearted woman she is, was appalled.
An extra job? Didn't I work long hours already? she asked.
I did indeed, I replied. However, in order to complete my projects (and boost our income) in a timely manner, I would need to finance the needed items. I told her that this would be the best way to do so without resorting to credit.
My young wife would not hear of it. What if I became ill from overwork? There must be a better way.
After much discussion, it was determined that she would work additional hours at her part time job, instead of only working one day a week.
I protested, as I worried about her health and the well being of our unborn child.
You should rest, I told her. But, being Japanese, she politely refused to listen. I asked her repeatedly was she sure this was what she wanted to do. I searched her face (a must when communicating with Asian women, as the eyes never lie) for signs that she was only being polite in her offer to increase her scheduled working hours.
Finally, I was assured that she was sincere when she said that I shouldn't worry about getting a part time job.
The conversation concluded, she rose from her seated position and went into the kitchen to prepare dinner from scratch. I went into the bathroom in order to prepare my nightly bath, as I pondered the feasibility of my plans for world conquest...
So what's yer point? you ask.
The moral here, Dear Reader, is manifold:
a) There are women in the world who love, respect, and appreciate their men enough to support him in a cheerful and loving manner.
b) There are women in the world who think of others instead of thinking only about themselves and their own comfort.
c) There are women in the world who understand that the man that loved them enough to marry them usually has their best interests at heart.
d) There are women in the world who fit the definition of the words wife and helpmate.
American women, in their mad dash to destroy Patriarchy in particular and men in general, have lost sight of the fact that a man, if properly appreciated and encouraged, will move heaven and earth to provide for her and her offspring in a manner that no other institution, such as Fedgov, or the local domestic violence shelter, could ever hope to match.
And as a consequence: Man, woman, child and society are much better off.
By sharing with you a bit of my personal life, I want to convey to my readers the happiness, warmth, kindness and loyalty that the cultivated man and the well groomed woman bring to the table.
Most of all, I want men to know that the woman of their dreams does exist. But unfortunately, thanks to insane feminist brainwashing, the man who seeks a lifelong mate will need to travel far in order to meet her. Women of my wife's caliber are incredibly few and far between in the Feminized West. If you should have such a woman on your team, be sure to take the time to appreciate her.
A real woman is a treasure indeed. Good luck gents, and good hunting!
Polygyny and why it's good for you!
Speaking of wives... Men over the centuries have discovered that sometimes, two (or more) wives are better than one.
An African proverb states:
To have one wife is to be one-eyed.
While I've explained, in detail, my reasons for supporting the ancient practice of Polygyny elsewhere, I do want to take a few moments and share some additional information with you, my Valuable Reader.
(One of the fringe benefits of multiple wives...)
From the National Business Review:
Polygamy key to long life
NBR Staff | Friday August 22 2008 - 03:57pm
New research suggests men from polygamous cultures outlive those from monogamous ones by 12 percent on average, according to a report from New Scientist.
Ecologist Virpi Lummaa from the University of Sheffield, UK, studied men aged 60+ from 189 countries on a monogamy scale of one to four – from totally monogamous to mostly polygamous for her research, presented to the International Society for Behavioral Ecology’s annual meeting in New York.
Lummaa and colleague Andy Russell also removed a country’s gross domestic product and average income to try and weed out the effects of better diet and healthcare from monogamous Western states.
Lummaa took pains to emphasise that their monogamy score is “a crude first stab”, and said they are trying to find different ways to assess marriage patterns – so their conclusions may change with further analysis.
It’s possible men who father children in the 60’s and 70’s take better care of themselves because of their dependents, conversely evolutionary forces may select for longer-lived men in polygamous cultures, according to the report.
Chris Wilson, an evolutionary anthropologist from Cornell University in New York who attended the talk said to New Scientist, "It's a valid hypothesis and good prediction."
He added that enjoying the loving attention of several wives who depend on their aging husband’s position in a social hierarchy may be the best explanation.
"It doesn't surprise me that men in those societies live longer than men in monogamous societies, where they become widowed and have nobody to care for them."
Interesting indeed.
We already know that marriage increases a man's lifespan, and we also know that sexual activity is essential for good mental and physical well-being, in addition to the biological importance of regular sexual activity for men in general.
So then, is a man more likely to have frequent "relations" in the confines of a monogamous or a polygamous marriage? The jury seems to be out on this question, but, as I argued previously, there may be a time in a married relationship when the wife is unable or unwilling to meet the man's very real sexual desires. In that case then, is a man justified if he takes another wife or concubine? And more importantly, should society punish a man who takes a mistress, another wife, or a concubine in his hour of need?
If we look at history, tradition, and religion, cultures across space and time have answered that it is permissible to take additional wives, and no, men should not be punished in draconian fashion for doing so. But in modern day America, the polygamous option, which has benefits (and drawbacks) for both men and women, has been forbidden by Supreme Court fiat.
Now isn't it strange, Dear Reader, that the right of men to take more than one wife, and to even be a part of monogamous married life, has been stripped away by the same corrupt institution?
Have not the Courts, who have ruled that Men are subject to child support slave labor, also decided that adults cannot choose to freely enter into polygamous unions?
Does anyone else see a pattern here?
In my opinion, if legal age, consenting adults wish to enter into polygamous unions, then it is their right to do so, although I do support limits to the practice for the sake of social harmony.
After all, Three's Company, four is a crowd!
In any event, I don't claim that polygamy, as a system, is superior to monogamy or celibacy. What I am saying however, is that for certain individuals, it can be the right lifestyle choice, and to prevent free people from exercising their rights by government decree is just as bad as when the rights of men are stripped away from them by the ignorant majority.
For me, in the final analysis, it's the principle of freedom coupled with responsibility that matters.
Togakure sez...
Be sure to check back next time as we discuss Rugged Men, womanly women, and why being a Punk is bad for your social life!
Peace.
Sunday, October 12, 2008
The Togakure Report: 10-13-2008
Gang,
As I ponder all of the economic doom and gloom that has taken place this week, I grow more and more concerned. While I've always known that our current turmoil would cause Fedgov to eventually give up the ghost, I fear that Uncle Sam will go the way of Iceland, go utterly bankrupt, and be forced into Receivership by it's foreign creditors.
What is Receivership?
According to Wiki:
A receiver is:
Again, this is my concern, not a matter of fact. However when I put all the evidence together, I'm afraid that this is where we are headed: being managed by a Receiver appointed by a coalition of various foreign and international entities which could include the IMF, the World Bank, and foreign creditors such as China and Japan.
Let's look at the evidence.
1) The United States of America is insolvent as I write this.
Dr. Chris Martenson writes:
With the passage of the bailout bill, and the recent expansion of money and credit by the Federal Reserve, it's pretty obvious what decision has been made... Reflation. And if Fedgov doesn't play its cards right (which it won't), Hyperinflation is a distinct possibility.
Consider that Secretary Paulson wants to "recapitalize" the banking system.
Dr Ron Paul, upon being asked what he thought of the plan, asked the critical question... what capital is being used to bail out these financial institutions?
Go back a little bit and click on some of the links provided. Where do you think Fedgov is getting all of these trillions to bail out the banks from? Do we have massive stockpiles of gold that will be sold to finance this transaction? Are we like the Japanese, sitting on billions of currency reserves?
I don't think so.
As Mr. Laurence Kotlikoff points out, the United States is bankrupt; already, today, and right now.
The only reason why our creditors were willing to make nice-nice is because foolish Americans such as myself bought tons of useless crap from foreigners, providing the illusion of growth for their manufacturing-centric economies.
Mr. Joel Hirschhorn writes:
Mr. Hirshhorn makes two very important points:
a) American consumers are 70% (!) of all economic activity in the U.S. Our rampant buying habits fuel economies around the world.
b) The ultimate solution to our economic and other problems will not and cannot come from Washington, it cannot come from McBama, and it certainly won't come from Martial Law or a consortium of International Creditors (more on this later). The solution to this problem requires the American masses to do something they absolutely hate to do...
THINK.
Human beings have all the powers of Heavan and Earth at their command... if only they would accept the responsibility!
Forgive me... I digress. Back to the impending foreclosure of the United States of America.
The almighty American deb... consumer is showing signs that she is tapped out. The wealth has been squandered. The home equity line of credit has been closed, and her credit cards are next. As Mish Shedlock would say... Peak Consumerism has been reached.
The Ponzi scheme is unraveling, and the inevitable downturn in spending will trigger massive losses as the economy slows further. Not even Bernanke and Paulson can reverse this trend.
In essence, no matter what the government does to solve this banking crisis, it won't be enough to prevent the collapse of the dollar, unless we take action right now to turn this ship around.
That means:
a) Chill out with the wars and bring our soldiers home.
b) Eliminate wasteful government spending at Federal, State, and Local levels.
c) Abolish the Fed, return monetary operations to the U.S. Treasury under the strict oversight of Congress, eliminate unconstitutional Federal income taxes on individuals and lower the tax rates on businesses to a low, flat, and competitive rate.
d) Reinforce Constitutional government by repealing the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. By doing so, the financial power of the Federal government will be greatly reduced.
e) Ratify a Constitutional Amendment that states, in no uncertain terms, that the American dollar is to be backed by Gold and silver.
f) Abolish No Fault Divorce and replace it with premarital agreements [aa][bb][cc] that are absolutely binding and enforceable throughout the land, get rid of the current child support system, remove the government from marriage except to enforce laws against marriage of minors and marriage under duress, and repeal all discriminatory domestic violence laws.
g) Mandate that all family related, domestic violence, and permanent restraining order trials, civil or criminal, be trial by jury, and that no action be taken by the government unless the evidence is beyond reasonable doubt and a jury votes to convict the defendant of the crime or offense charged by the State.
Items F and G would go a long way towards strengthening the most fundamental unit of social, human, economic, and political capital, the married family unit. One cannot have a strong economy and a Constitutional Republican form of government when gender trench warfare dominates all aspects of life.
If these steps were taken, I would at once have a more optimistic outlook on America's economic future. Unfortunately, recent actions as undertaken by the Dynamic Duo of Paulson and Bernanke, the President, and the Congress tell me that collapse, pain, and poverty are all but guaranteed.
2) Foreign Creditors have serious skin in the game.
Let's take a moment to find out who America's creditors are, and how much money they have in play.
From the Sydney Morning Herald:
From the China Daily:
From Bloomberg:
From the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel:
Please note that China's Ambassador is keeping a close eye on the financial situation.
Why would they do that unless:
a) Foreign creditor nations are beginning to doubt our ability to repay
b) They have too much riding on this for the Americans to fuck it up now.
If you had over a trillion dollars invested in a shitty enterprise, wouldn't you want to make sure you get paid? What would you do to insure you didn't lose all of your hard earned cash? Is it that far fetched to assume that you, as a creditor, would be interested in exercising your legal rights [1][2][3]
[4][5]?
Please understand that I am not an international attorney. However it appears that there is a framework in place for a creditor nation, such as China, to bring action against the United States in a court of some kind. And one way that China's claims can be satisfied is if the United States is placed in Receivership.
Please remember that in Finance, love and money don't mix. When it comes to trillions of dollars and the general welfare of their people, don't think for a minute that foreign nations are going to cut us some slack just because we Americans are nice guys who are simply down on their luck. The entire system is corrupt, and the gangstas that have lent us these fantastic sums of money aren't gonna take no for an answer.
I can just hear the Saudis and other high roller investors now...
Can I get PAID Muthafucka??
One more thing before we move on... there is a historical precedent for the Receivership of nations. Check out what happened to the African nation of Liberia, and read about Iceland's declared bankruptcy here.
Keep in mind, however, that the world will never see a default as massive as the eventual American bankruptcy... so what will actually go down when it happens is anyone's guess. All hell could easily break loose at that fateful moment.
3) Rumors of takeover abound.
Here lately, I've come across some very interesting pieces that peaked my curiosity enough to write this post.
Jim Willie writes:
Mr. Rob Kirby writes:
Speaking of Martial Law, Mr. Kirby is not alone in sounding the threat.
The Economicrot blogspot notes:
To the author of Economicrot: You won't be alone friend. Togakure has nothing to lose, and everything to gain, by speaking the truth, no matter what happens.
As I said earlier, the People, at all times, have the power, even if they choose not to exercise it. Not even the awesome might of the U.S. Military can withstand it.
To my fellow government officials, police officers, and military serivcemen, who are reading this blog, understand that you have a DUTY to defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic, and you will be called to fulfill that obligation at some point in the future. If you have evidence of your superiors violating the Constitution, and plotting against this nation, it is your duty to speak out and share what you know with as many people as possible. Guilty parties can only bring their plans to fruition if good people like you do nothing.
While International Bankers think that the American People will simply roll over and accept the fact that their government has sold them into debt bondage, and that Martial Law will aid in their efforts to collect on their payments, I would suggest that they think again, as any such unlawful and unconstitutional attempt will meet with justified violent resistance and failure. I have faith that many in government are true patriots who will, when the time comes, side with their brothers and sisters to arrest, try, and imprison the traitors who have brought our country to this dire predicament.
See Argentina as an example of how the will of the people, once angered, cannot be ignored.
4) Conclusion.
Dear Reader,
These are my speculations... I don't claim to be 100% accurate or correct about this issue. However, when one looks at the totality of the evidence, it becomes very plausible that our nation is headed in this direction.
I've often said that feminism is a symptom of a greater illness. And this crisis we find ourselves in is another manifestation of that sickness.
Cheap money and credit, and the overreach of government are also symptoms... they are not the root causes of our suffering.
The true illness that our Republic suffers from is a breakdown of our moral fiber, and the disregard of the Universal principles that lead to liberty, prosperity, and success.
A nation that harbors a "something for nothing" mentality, belittles those who exercise self control and self restraint, that murders children on demand, that fails to uphold the Universal Principles of justice and fairness, or that grants special rights instead of upholding Equal Rights cannot and will not maintain political, economic, or cultural supremacy. This has been the inescapable truth since Ancient Kemet, Classical Greece, Old Rome, and other civilizations that rose and fell on their adherence to, or estrangement from, the laws that govern creation and everything in it.
What Principles are these? Pick up a Bible. Or look in the works of Aristotle. Study the wisdom teachings of Kemet. Read the words of the Founding Fathers. Consult the Confucian Analects. Read works by Adam Smith, or Ludwig von Mises. Listen to seminars given by Napoleon Hill, Earl Nightingale, and others. Ponder the words of the Buddha.
The Principles have been phrased and rephrased by numerous Men of Old. They are not hard to find, if one earnestly seeks them out.
Unless and until we return to the fundamental principles that ensure peace, prosperity, freedom and justice, we will continue our downward spiral into irrelevancy. Success and failure is an effect, and not a cause. Doing the right things will lead to success. Doing the wrong things will lead to failure. It's really that simple.
The future has yet to be finalized... and I continually hope that the People will finally wake up from their slumber, recognize the power they possess, and take the necessary actions to confront and defeat the monsters of tyranny, injustice, and fear.
It's not an impossible task. What's done can be undone. What has been destroyed can be re-created. But first, one must believe as strongly in their right to be free, as much as the bad guys believe they have the right to dominate the entire world.
Time is running out.
Toku.
As I ponder all of the economic doom and gloom that has taken place this week, I grow more and more concerned. While I've always known that our current turmoil would cause Fedgov to eventually give up the ghost, I fear that Uncle Sam will go the way of Iceland, go utterly bankrupt, and be forced into Receivership by it's foreign creditors.
What is Receivership?
According to Wiki:
Receivership is used to denote a situation in which an institution or enterprise is being held by a receiver.
A receiver is:
In law, a receiver is a person "placed in the custodial responsibility for the property of others, including tangible and intangible assets and rights."[1] Three types of receiver appointments exist:[1]
1. a receiver appointed by a (government) regulator pursuant to a statute;
2. a privately-appointed receiver; and
3. a court-appointed receiver.[1] The receiver's powers "flow from the document(s) underlying his appointment – a statute, financing agreement, or court order.
Court-appointed receivers are "the most powerful and independent of the judicially-appointed managers."[2] Unlike special masters and monitors, "the receiver completely displaces the defendants: the receiver makes large and small decisions, spends the organization’s funds, and controls hiring and firing determinations."[2]
Again, this is my concern, not a matter of fact. However when I put all the evidence together, I'm afraid that this is where we are headed: being managed by a Receiver appointed by a coalition of various foreign and international entities which could include the IMF, the World Bank, and foreign creditors such as China and Japan.
Let's look at the evidence.
1) The United States of America is insolvent as I write this.
Dr. Chris Martenson writes:
Prepare to be shocked.
The US is insolvent. There is simply no way for our national bills to be paid under current levels of taxation and promised benefits. Our federal deficits alone now total more than 400% of GDP.
That is the conclusion of a recent Treasury/OMB report entitled Financial Report of the United States Government [a][b] that was quietly slipped out on a Friday (12/15/06), deep in the holiday season, with little fanfare. Sometimes I wonder why the Treasury Department doesn’t just pay somebody to come in at 4:30 am Christmas morning to release the report. Additionally, I’ve yet to read a single account of this report in any of the major news media outlets but that is another matter.
But, hey, I understand. A report this bad requires all the muffling it can get.
In his accompanying statement to the report, David Walker [c][d], Comptroller of the US, warmed up his audience by stating that the GAO had found so many significant material deficiencies in the government’s accounting systems that the GAO was “unable to express an opinion” on the financial statements. Ha ha! He really knows how to play an audience!
In accounting parlance, that’s the same as telling your spouse “Our checkbook is such an out of control mess I can’t tell if we’re broke or rich!” The next time you have an unexplained rash of checking withdrawals from that fishing trip with your buddies, just tell her that you are “unable to express an opinion” and see how that flies. Let us know how it goes!
Then Walker went on to deliver the really bad news:
Despite improvement in both the fiscal year 2006 reported net operating cost and the cash-based budget deficit, the U.S. government’s total reported liabilities, net social insurance commitments, and other fiscal exposures continue to grow and now total approximately $50 trillion, representing approximately four times the Nation’s total output (GDP) in fiscal year 2006, up from about $20 trillion, or two times GDP in fiscal year 2000.
As this long-term fiscal imbalance continues to grow, the retirement of the “baby boom” generation is closer to becoming a reality with the first wave of boomers eligible for early retirement under Social Security in 2008.
Given these and other factors, it seems clear that the nation’s current fiscal path is unsustainable and that tough choices by the President and the Congress are necessary in order to address the nation’s large and growing long-term fiscal imbalance...
With the passage of the bailout bill, and the recent expansion of money and credit by the Federal Reserve, it's pretty obvious what decision has been made... Reflation. And if Fedgov doesn't play its cards right (which it won't), Hyperinflation is a distinct possibility.
Consider that Secretary Paulson wants to "recapitalize" the banking system.
Dr Ron Paul, upon being asked what he thought of the plan, asked the critical question... what capital is being used to bail out these financial institutions?
Go back a little bit and click on some of the links provided. Where do you think Fedgov is getting all of these trillions to bail out the banks from? Do we have massive stockpiles of gold that will be sold to finance this transaction? Are we like the Japanese, sitting on billions of currency reserves?
I don't think so.
As Mr. Laurence Kotlikoff points out, the United States is bankrupt; already, today, and right now.
The only reason why our creditors were willing to make nice-nice is because foolish Americans such as myself bought tons of useless crap from foreigners, providing the illusion of growth for their manufacturing-centric economies.
Mr. Joel Hirschhorn writes:
The Most Powerful People in America
They are not the rich and superrich, nor the politically powerful running the two-party plutocracy, nor the greedy heads of banking and finance companies, and certainly not the media moguls and bloviating pundits.
The most powerful people are US, American consumers that account for over 70 percent of the economy. It is exactly now, when the economy is in the toilet, that consumers hold the maximum power. So why are we the people still deluding ourselves that the path to a better future rests on electing a new president?
We are suckers, conditioned by decades of clever marketing and advertising to believe the lies of politicians, and worst of all to believe that elections and our votes provide us with power. Wrong. Our real power can only be manifest through our spending dollars...
Mr. Hirshhorn makes two very important points:
a) American consumers are 70% (!) of all economic activity in the U.S. Our rampant buying habits fuel economies around the world.
b) The ultimate solution to our economic and other problems will not and cannot come from Washington, it cannot come from McBama, and it certainly won't come from Martial Law or a consortium of International Creditors (more on this later). The solution to this problem requires the American masses to do something they absolutely hate to do...
THINK.
Human beings have all the powers of Heavan and Earth at their command... if only they would accept the responsibility!
Forgive me... I digress. Back to the impending foreclosure of the United States of America.
The almighty American deb... consumer is showing signs that she is tapped out. The wealth has been squandered. The home equity line of credit has been closed, and her credit cards are next. As Mish Shedlock would say... Peak Consumerism has been reached.
The Ponzi scheme is unraveling, and the inevitable downturn in spending will trigger massive losses as the economy slows further. Not even Bernanke and Paulson can reverse this trend.
In essence, no matter what the government does to solve this banking crisis, it won't be enough to prevent the collapse of the dollar, unless we take action right now to turn this ship around.
That means:
a) Chill out with the wars and bring our soldiers home.
b) Eliminate wasteful government spending at Federal, State, and Local levels.
c) Abolish the Fed, return monetary operations to the U.S. Treasury under the strict oversight of Congress, eliminate unconstitutional Federal income taxes on individuals and lower the tax rates on businesses to a low, flat, and competitive rate.
d) Reinforce Constitutional government by repealing the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. By doing so, the financial power of the Federal government will be greatly reduced.
e) Ratify a Constitutional Amendment that states, in no uncertain terms, that the American dollar is to be backed by Gold and silver.
f) Abolish No Fault Divorce and replace it with premarital agreements [aa][bb][cc] that are absolutely binding and enforceable throughout the land, get rid of the current child support system, remove the government from marriage except to enforce laws against marriage of minors and marriage under duress, and repeal all discriminatory domestic violence laws.
g) Mandate that all family related, domestic violence, and permanent restraining order trials, civil or criminal, be trial by jury, and that no action be taken by the government unless the evidence is beyond reasonable doubt and a jury votes to convict the defendant of the crime or offense charged by the State.
Items F and G would go a long way towards strengthening the most fundamental unit of social, human, economic, and political capital, the married family unit. One cannot have a strong economy and a Constitutional Republican form of government when gender trench warfare dominates all aspects of life.
If these steps were taken, I would at once have a more optimistic outlook on America's economic future. Unfortunately, recent actions as undertaken by the Dynamic Duo of Paulson and Bernanke, the President, and the Congress tell me that collapse, pain, and poverty are all but guaranteed.
2) Foreign Creditors have serious skin in the game.
Let's take a moment to find out who America's creditors are, and how much money they have in play.
From the Sydney Morning Herald:
End of America's era - now it is China that calls the tune
SO THE Group of Seven leaders have vowed to "take all necessary steps" to stop the world's financial immolation. That's good news. But first they are doing whatever is necessary to secure for themselves what is left of their toasted assets.
Last week Gordon Brown's priority was to use money laundering and terrorism laws to seize the British vaults of a bankrupt Icelandic bank. He says he will seize more Icelandic assets "wherever is necessary" to secure £20 billion ($52 billion) invested by Britons and British local governments.International insolvency practitioners call it ring fencing - where rich countries, usually the United States, can lock down their borders to seize assets and jump in front of equally entitled but less muscular international creditors. That is why the US will get the lion's share of the leftovers of bankrupt investment banks like Lehmans.
But Iceland and Lehmans are sideshows in the new world of international financial cooperation and brinkmanship. The match-up that matters is between the mother of all debtors, the United States Government, and its primary financier, the Chinese Government.
By now China has accumulated more than $US2 trillion ($3 trillion) in foreign exchange reserves... experts in both China and the US estimate that 70 per cent of China's foreign assets are held in the form of loans to the US Government and its agencies...
From the China Daily:
The authorities are following closely Washington's response to the ongoing financial crisis as the turmoil has affected Chinese investment in the United States, especially the large amount of US bonds being held by the country, Chinese ambassador to the US Zhou Wenzhong has said.
"As China holds large amounts in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares and in US bonds, the financial storm has definitely impacted Chinese investment. So we're paying a good deal of attention to the crisis," said Zhou in a speech on China-US trade relations at the Center for National Policy in Washington DC, on Wednesday.
The China Newsweek magazine reported on Oct 9 that $1.2 trillion of the country's $1.8 trillion foreign exchange reserves are held in the US markets. Nearly half of the funds have reportedly gone to US government housing insurers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, while most of the remaining half are in US bonds...
From Bloomberg:
... The world has a systemic problem that requires a broad solution -- if not a global approach, at least a pan-European one. First, governments must recognize the need for a comprehensive remedy.
Asian Money
Next, they need bucks, big bucks, to recapitalize large swaths of the global banking system -- especially in the West -- by purchasing worthless securities, making shareholders and creditors pay.
For that, as famed American bank robber Willie Sutton said, you go where the money is. Today that's Asia, home to more than 60 percent of the world's foreign-currency reserves. China has $1.8 trillion, Japan holds $971 billion and India has $283 billion. After them come Taiwan with $281 billion, South Korea with $240 billion and Singapore with $170 billion.
From the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel:
... Oil-rich states also became big buyers of U.S. debt. The Treasury tracks a 15-nation bloc of oil-exporting nations like Saudi Arabia, Iran, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates, which collectively own $174 billion of America's debt, making that group the fourth-biggest lender to the United States, behind No. 3 Britain ($291 billion)...
Please note that China's Ambassador is keeping a close eye on the financial situation.
Why would they do that unless:
a) Foreign creditor nations are beginning to doubt our ability to repay
b) They have too much riding on this for the Americans to fuck it up now.
If you had over a trillion dollars invested in a shitty enterprise, wouldn't you want to make sure you get paid? What would you do to insure you didn't lose all of your hard earned cash? Is it that far fetched to assume that you, as a creditor, would be interested in exercising your legal rights [1][2][3]
[4][5]?
Please understand that I am not an international attorney. However it appears that there is a framework in place for a creditor nation, such as China, to bring action against the United States in a court of some kind. And one way that China's claims can be satisfied is if the United States is placed in Receivership.
Please remember that in Finance, love and money don't mix. When it comes to trillions of dollars and the general welfare of their people, don't think for a minute that foreign nations are going to cut us some slack just because we Americans are nice guys who are simply down on their luck. The entire system is corrupt, and the gangstas that have lent us these fantastic sums of money aren't gonna take no for an answer.
I can just hear the Saudis and other high roller investors now...
Can I get PAID Muthafucka??
One more thing before we move on... there is a historical precedent for the Receivership of nations. Check out what happened to the African nation of Liberia, and read about Iceland's declared bankruptcy here.
Keep in mind, however, that the world will never see a default as massive as the eventual American bankruptcy... so what will actually go down when it happens is anyone's guess. All hell could easily break loose at that fateful moment.
3) Rumors of takeover abound.
Here lately, I've come across some very interesting pieces that peaked my curiosity enough to write this post.
Jim Willie writes:
... The events (the ongoing credit crisis) are moving toward some upcoming surprises of historical magnitude. Think default and receivership, with foreign control. The massive rollover and refunding requirements from USTreasury Bonds will put monumental strain on the system, which the monetization US$ printing press cannot alone manage. Unless and until foreign creditors step in, the US financial sector will continue to operate like a crime syndicate, since regulatory bodies and law enforcement officials are all part of the coordinated congame...
... The four primary features that have pushed the United States into a certain position in Third World status are these:
1) globalization with deep Western investment in China
2) insolvency of four pillars of federal, trade, housing, banking
3) export of fraud with mortgage bonds, mainly to China, Europe, Russia, England
4) military aggression and annexation with continuous deceit and propaganda.
The many points describe a system broken without remedy, inviting default and receivership. Both are in progress behind the curtains, but on foreign soil. As Mohamed El-Erian of PIMCO (formerly Harvard Univ) said recently, “The unthinkable is thinkable.” Little known to the majority of Americans, foreign disgust grows. Their desire to isolate the United States is growing, in order to protect themselves from financial collapse and further spread of fraud. The German economics experts are saying “The World Shouldn't Have to Bear the Burden for America's Lapses” in Spiegel Online (click here) in a public article...
... A solution comes from foreign creditors that does not require Congressional approval or vote, constituting an event to pull the rug from under the Americans. The avenue will be via bank channels. A receivership committee is being formed...
Mr. Rob Kirby writes:
...In a related note, back on September 9, 2008 I wrote, The Stars Are Aligning - But For What? Where I highlighted the work of Adrian Douglas, GATA consultant and frequent contributor to LeMetropolecafe.com. Douglas’ work follows the Gold position of Goldman Sachs [a surrogate of the Federal Reserve] on the Tokyo Commodities Exchange [TOCOM]. I stated then:
The activities of Goldman Sachs “shorting gold” on TOCOM [Tokyo Commodities Exchange] was first brought to my attention by Adrian Douglas via Bill Murphy’s daily Midas commentary at Lemetropolecafe.com. on Jan. 10, 2006. Douglas has reported on Goldman’s daily TOCOM gold futures position changes for almost 3 years.
With Goldman Sachs representing a defacto surrogate of the Federal Reserve, it is clear that the Fed is moving from being “overextended short” to flat – or possibly going long gold.
I believe this transition is critically important, much like a fuse burning toward explosives.
When this position crosses over from short to long, as I expect it will sometime this month, I expect that some large deafening bells will be ringing – somewhere.
Well, I’d like to report that last night [as of Sept. 24, 2008], Goldman Sachs has further reduced their “short gold position” by over one thousand contracts on TOCOM to “net” 624 contracts short – from a high water mark of more than 50,000 contracts short a couple of years ago.
I now surmise that the “lit fuse” referred to above, is actually a count-down to the imminent imposition of “RECEIVERSHIP of the U.S.A” by a multi-national group of creditors.
I now expect this RECEIVERSHIP to be fully endorsed by the Federal Reserve and to help implement and enforce the proceedings:
U.S. Army Unit to Deploy in October for Domestic Operations
Washington, September 23 (RHC)-- The U.S. Army reportedly plans to station an active unit inside the United States beginning in October. The deployment marks the first time that an active military team has been given orders to serve as an on-call response unit in times of emergency.
According to media sources, the Third Infantry Division’s 1st Brigade Combat Team has spent 35 of the last 60 months in Iraq, but now the unit is training for domestic operations. The unit will soon be under the day-to-day control of U.S. Army North, the Army service component of Northern Command…..
Can any of you say Martial Law or hear the sound of jack-boots yet?
Speaking of Martial Law, Mr. Kirby is not alone in sounding the threat.
The Economicrot blogspot notes:
The plans to implement martial law in America have been taking shape for decades, hidden behind "Continuity of Government" contingency planning. Now, with public outcry over the banker bailout bill at fever pitch, all of the pieces are in place for the U.S. Army to start policing American citizens.
I have little doubt this economic crisis, if it continues to spiral out of control, will be used as the basis for Martial Law implementation. Additionally, regardless of my 21 years of honorable military service (USAF Retired), I will likely be one of those identified as a domestic terrorist - due to this Blog and my non conformist viewpoints against our banker/corporation controlled government...
To the author of Economicrot: You won't be alone friend. Togakure has nothing to lose, and everything to gain, by speaking the truth, no matter what happens.
As I said earlier, the People, at all times, have the power, even if they choose not to exercise it. Not even the awesome might of the U.S. Military can withstand it.
To my fellow government officials, police officers, and military serivcemen, who are reading this blog, understand that you have a DUTY to defend the Constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic, and you will be called to fulfill that obligation at some point in the future. If you have evidence of your superiors violating the Constitution, and plotting against this nation, it is your duty to speak out and share what you know with as many people as possible. Guilty parties can only bring their plans to fruition if good people like you do nothing.
While International Bankers think that the American People will simply roll over and accept the fact that their government has sold them into debt bondage, and that Martial Law will aid in their efforts to collect on their payments, I would suggest that they think again, as any such unlawful and unconstitutional attempt will meet with justified violent resistance and failure. I have faith that many in government are true patriots who will, when the time comes, side with their brothers and sisters to arrest, try, and imprison the traitors who have brought our country to this dire predicament.
See Argentina as an example of how the will of the people, once angered, cannot be ignored.
4) Conclusion.
Dear Reader,
These are my speculations... I don't claim to be 100% accurate or correct about this issue. However, when one looks at the totality of the evidence, it becomes very plausible that our nation is headed in this direction.
I've often said that feminism is a symptom of a greater illness. And this crisis we find ourselves in is another manifestation of that sickness.
Cheap money and credit, and the overreach of government are also symptoms... they are not the root causes of our suffering.
The true illness that our Republic suffers from is a breakdown of our moral fiber, and the disregard of the Universal principles that lead to liberty, prosperity, and success.
A nation that harbors a "something for nothing" mentality, belittles those who exercise self control and self restraint, that murders children on demand, that fails to uphold the Universal Principles of justice and fairness, or that grants special rights instead of upholding Equal Rights cannot and will not maintain political, economic, or cultural supremacy. This has been the inescapable truth since Ancient Kemet, Classical Greece, Old Rome, and other civilizations that rose and fell on their adherence to, or estrangement from, the laws that govern creation and everything in it.
What Principles are these? Pick up a Bible. Or look in the works of Aristotle. Study the wisdom teachings of Kemet. Read the words of the Founding Fathers. Consult the Confucian Analects. Read works by Adam Smith, or Ludwig von Mises. Listen to seminars given by Napoleon Hill, Earl Nightingale, and others. Ponder the words of the Buddha.
The Principles have been phrased and rephrased by numerous Men of Old. They are not hard to find, if one earnestly seeks them out.
Unless and until we return to the fundamental principles that ensure peace, prosperity, freedom and justice, we will continue our downward spiral into irrelevancy. Success and failure is an effect, and not a cause. Doing the right things will lead to success. Doing the wrong things will lead to failure. It's really that simple.
The future has yet to be finalized... and I continually hope that the People will finally wake up from their slumber, recognize the power they possess, and take the necessary actions to confront and defeat the monsters of tyranny, injustice, and fear.
It's not an impossible task. What's done can be undone. What has been destroyed can be re-created. But first, one must believe as strongly in their right to be free, as much as the bad guys believe they have the right to dominate the entire world.
Time is running out.
Toku.
Sunday, October 5, 2008
Sex and Sensibility.
Please view the video for a preview of today's subject matter...
First Things First.
Before I express my thoughts on everyone's favorite extra-curricular activity, I'd like to briefly mention that YOUR House of Representatives voted in favor of the most useless bailout in history.
(But I'm sure you already know that by now.)
This bill will do nothing to solve our crisis, and indeed, it is nothing more than the beginning of a massive re-inflation campaign that could very well tear the economy to shreds, trigger a massive dollar crisis as foreign investors dump devalued dollars, and doom this nation to third world status.
The best and most thorough explanation I've seen since my undergraduate Money and Banking class (taught by a former member of the St. Louis Federal Reserve) of how the Fed works and how, in partnership with the U.S. Treasury, it will eventually turn the U.S. Dollar into toilet tissue can be found here.
You will come away amazed and enraged. I know I was.
Incidentally, the French are already calling for a real New World Order that will not include America at its head. And, as I've previously surmised, American led efforts such as I-VAWA and CEDAW will be allowed to die a quiet death.
I can just imagine major heads of state saying to themselves behind closed doors:
If those pussy-whipped Americans are capable of squandering the wealth and power of the most prosperous nation in the history of the world, why in the hell should we adopt their screwed up family values? Our women are just fine, thank you very much!
Here's a newsflash for the Marxist-Feminists:
On a worldwide scale; no one gives a fuck about 'chya. Nations do what they do in order to make nice nice with the current Superpower, not because they give a flying fudge about feminist family values. Declining American influence = declining feminist influence.
Case in point: The Russians, having had a heaping helping of Anti-Family Marxist propaganda, aren't trying to adopt Matriarchal Western values, for very compelling reasons.
In any event, there is no possible way that this long overdue economic correction can be avoided. Indeed, with our massive outstanding liabilities for social security, medicare, and the like, our incredible military spending, and the unceasing destruction of the most fundamental unit of economic production, the married family unit, the outcome is certain.
This attempt to keep the good times rolling will meet with failure. When and how the wheels fall off, I can only speculate. But I do know that those in Congress that voted YEA for this bill have betrayed the public trust, and all those who supported this bill should be voted out of office at the earliest opportunity!
(Politicians and Bankers team up to screw the gullible American populace).
Neither Conservative nor Liberal be.
Speaking of congress, we'll be talking about this subject at length today. I've said previously that I'm not a "conservative," and you're getting ready to find out why.
In a nutshell, I am a Classical Liberal who believes that people's private lives are none of my concern, so long as all participating parties are of legal age, consent to their lifestyles without duress or threat of violence, and don't fuck up shit for me and mine.
As a matter of fact, the main reason why I became an MRA is that feminists and power mongers passed a bunch of bullshit laws such as VAWA that threaten my liberties, in addition to slandering my honor as a man. My message to the "Do-Gooders" who brought all of this shit to fruition:
STAY THE F*&K OUTTA MY BITNESS BITCHES; AND DON'T DRAG MY GOOD NAME THROUGH THE MUD!!
In general, I support the right of religious and secular groups of various ideologies to contribute to the overall marketplace of ideas, because no one has a patent on the truth. Sometimes I can be right on one subject, but someone else might be more knowledgeable about another. I can accept that. Plus, I don't know enough about what is going on in the lives of other people to want to control their very human natures like feminists have sought to do.
However, those who would teach moral codes and the like, such as Islamic Supremacists, have no right to impose their teachings upon others.
And indeed, there is no need for moral systems to win converts by the sword, or by deception, as in the feminist/marxist case. If the belief system is in harmony with the Universal Laws that govern creation and human affairs, then people will seek out the teachings by their own accord. As it is written, people tend to be convicted by their own spirit.
For example, I support the right of two men or two women to have a private "marriage" ceremony with the group of one's choosing, make contractual obligations with one another, appoint one another as power of attorney, etc. As a matter of fact, I don't give a S&^T one way or another, because I personally don't hang in homosexual circles. Live and let live.
I don't support laws making "gay marriage" legal, nor do I support laws banning the practice.
Why? Because I personally believe that true and valid marriage, the form that societies base their civilizations upon, that involve men and women and children, are beyond the reach of government. With the exception of preventing forced marriages, or the marriages of adults to minor children, government has no role in marriage, and should stay as far away from it as possible [1][2][3].
In my perfect world, since many religious groups oppose homosexuality on principle, they would, of course retain the right to speak out against gay partnerships, and refuse to perform same-sex ceremonies; while pro-homosexual groups would continue to speak in favor of same sex unions, and gay friendly organizations would continue to "marry" gay couples.
Friendly debate, Yes. Laws supporting or banning same-sex ceremonies, No.
As highlighted above, the conflict between values is a prime example as to why our Constitutional system was designed the way it was. Our system is one that enforces the Rule of Law, and recognizes universal Natural Rights and responsibilities, and is the only way that differing groups of people can live together in peace and relative harmony. This is also the only way that equilibrium in the life of a nation can be maintained because, if the rights and responsibilities of a certain group are violated, be it because of racism, sexism, discrimination because of a certain creed, etc, then the natural reaction of the downtrodden group will be for them to organize and play the game of group politics. As time passes, individuals identify with the group instead of with the nation; and the individual group members may end up supporting a larger agenda that may in fact be against their own best interests.
This is the situation we have now in America... groups bitterly in competition for laws, policies, and programs that benefit their in-group members only, all the while corrupting and weakening the nation as a whole.
Entire classes of people, for example, Men and children, are seeing their Natural, God given rights to life, liberty, property, and the impartial adjudication of disputes trampled upon in order to give more and more rights (and less and less responsibilities) to women.
And, especially in the black American community, many are so fearful that the larger society will not protect their individual rights as people (for obvious historical reasons), that they support "leaders" that are, in reality, pushing agendas that are not in their best interests.
(Harriet Tubman)
(Frederick Douglas)
Instead of carrying on the tradition of self reliance and resistance to injustice displayed by honored ancestors such as Harriet Tubman and Frederick Douglas, many of us have the Great Society and Obamanation outlook of welfarism, underachievement, and bitter gender warfare.
When I say underachievement, I mean this: why are these leaders only offering incentives to make less than a certain income, when black Americans have the potential within themselves to earn as many dollars as they desire?
I don't know about you, but a salary of $250,000 a year is a pittance. I know that I can achieve greater financial success than this. Where are the leaders encouraging us to aim for the stars?
Why is it that black Americans are discouraged from forming the most effective family arrangement known to mankind? Why is it that the single mother family is the predominate arrangement for raising children, when our African ancestors and contemporaries treasure the institution of marriage (monogamous and polygamous) ?
You see, it makes no sense. And yet, it is because of group politics that many are fearful to examine these obvious contradictions, and act to correct them. It's hard to straighten up and fly right when the Great Ark of the Group has already capsized.
Membership in the group is simply too valuable to lose, even if the tribe is sinking in the cold, dark waters of the North Atlantic, just like the Titanic.
This state of affairs is completely unsustainable in the long run, for a host of reasons discussed at length on this blog, and is completely at odds with our traditions of Constitutional Republicanism.
Human beings deserve and should expect equal rights and responsibilities; not SPECIAL rights and waived responsibilities. This is against the Universal Law, and those that violate the Law are always punished.
Anything less than this standard of Equal rights and responsibilities is unjust, tyrannical, and must be challenged, opposed, and defeated, lest the malignant cancer of favoritism spread and kill the body politic.
Forgive me for digressing, but please keep these ideals in mind as I continue with this post.
A Woman's Work.
While surfing the web for interesting material to write about, I found this article entitled, Women's Work:
Ahh... good ol' Prostitution. Is it a social evil?
Some people would answer in the affirmative without hesitation. I take a different view.
My position is simple: Prostitution should be legalized, regulated, and taxed, like any other occupation. Women who are over the legal age of consent, who are free of sexually transmitted diseases, and who are not being forced into sex work, have every right to enter this profession if they so choose.
For those who wish to learn more about sex-work, pornography, and prostitution from someone actively involved in the business, you might want to stop by and check out my good friend Renegade Evolution's SWOP-East Blog.
My commentary will focus on why prostitution should be legal and commercially available to Men, from a Men's Rights perspective.
Our author writes:
The writer also notes:
The journalist, telling us about Prostitution in Amsterdam, remarks:
When you have a moment, check out the entire article.
So you might be asking, what's your point here?
Lemme break it down.
Men who visit prostitutes, especially in the English speaking countries, tend to be looked down upon by polite society. Shaming language such as, "losers", "abusers", "weirdos", "perverts", and other grade school insults are commonplace. Men who decide to bypass today's modern feminist woman and pay prostitutes for sex are urged to "step up their game" and "find a real woman to date", among other retarded advice.
However, the article above tells us that normal men, who have found "real women" to mate with and marry, prefer, for various personal reasons, to pay for sex. These men could be family members, co-workers, friends or acquaintances. And most of the men featured have found out too late that getting married in the West isn't a "death to us part" proposition. Maybe they've figured out by now that life, love, and marriage aren't as simplistic as it's made out to be.
The way I see it, the hysteria surrounding this most intimate of transactions is another example of society brainwashing a man from fulfilling one of his most deep-seated desires at his discretion.
What women (and a good many Manginas) fail to understand is that the vast majority of men are hardwired to be lean, mean, sex machines; so much so that many women aren't in a position to keep up.
Men are not women; we are fundamentally different. And when it comes to love and sex, we process these impulses using quite different operating systems.
(Dr. Louann Brizendine)
Dr. Louann Brizendine informs us in her magnificent book, The Female Brain (highly recommended):
(Compare O'Hare International Airport...)
(... to Greenwood Municipal Airport. Any Questions?)
Dr. Brizendine explains how a woman's sex drive can be easily shut down by other activities, such as caring for an infant:
This last paragraph brings to mind a universally recognized truth for many married couples... the sex stops, or moves to a crawl, once children enter the picture.
Let's take a look at a few examples.
(What she's really thinking...)
From Momlogic.com:
From The Standard:
From Divorce Busting:
There are countless articles, studies, and reports that prove that the average Man desires sex a lot more than the average woman.
And in light of the overwhelming evidence, I will boldly state that the current social arrangement; that men are supposed to grow up, marry only one woman, and confine his sexual activity to that one woman only for the rest of his natural life is not the best lifestyle fit for every man on the planet, and to expect all men to conform to this one size fits all ideal is a recipe for frustration and failure.
Some men are perfectly happy living a totally monogamous lifestyle, and there is nothing wrong with that. However in real life, many men will not be able (or willing) to meet such a standard. And from a historical perspective, when we consider that Prostitution, Concubinage, and Polygamous marriage has been much more common and widespread than our American monogamous model, we come to the conclusion that our current social model is both limited in scope and shortsighted in its understanding of the nature of the Male Sex.
Also when one considers that a married woman is no longer obligated to perform her basic carnal duties, and that if a husband complains about a lack of loving, he is committing an offense akin to marital rape or some other alleged form of "violence," the present state of affairs is completely absurd.
In addition, the fact that prostitution, a traditional outlet of sexual frustration for Men in Western culture [1][2], is illegal doesn't help matters, and the overall expectation of 100% fidelity at all times and in all situations greatly discourages today's modern man from marriage:
A) Why marry if you can get all the Poontang you can get if you remain single?
B) If you get married and sexual peccadilloes occur, are you prepared to lose your property, children, family, livelihood, or even your life?
Now I know some of you might think that I am placing undue emphasis on Sex, as if there are no other considerations such as honoring one's vows, the exercise of self discipline and self control, religious or spiritual principles, among other things.
Indeed, there are many valid arguments as to why sexual restraint is necessary.
As an example of why the male sex drive would need to be subliminated, author Muata Ashby, in his book Sacred Sexuality: Ancient Egyptian Tantric Yoga, explains that:
The author also notes that, on a physical level:
(Napoleon Hill)
Noted writer and success coach Napoleon Hill, in his masterwork of Think and Grow Rich, tells us that:
Mr. Hill also notes that most people do not succeed before the age of Forty because:
(J.A. Rogers)
Author J.A. Rogers, in his classic work Sex and Race volume 3 writes:
(A Greek Hetaira)
(Love in India)
Mr. Joseph Unwin, author of Sex and Culture, bases his entire work on the premise that civilization makes its ascent when the sex drive is channeled into constructive activity and remains highly regulated; and that societies fall when sexual mores loosen, leading to a irresistable landslide of corruption and collapse.
With all that said, I recognize and respect the power of sex. It is the force that engenders life, and reckless handling of this awesome power can bring death, decay, and destruction. A society as sexually promiscuous as ours seems to have thrown caution to the wind, and has turned the Western world into Fuckfest 2008, possibly signifying the end of the Age of Western Dominance.
Ironically, our society only allows near absolute freedom of sexual expression within certain parameters that does nothing to contribute to social stability and long term sustainability, and goes a long way towards undermining it.
If we as a culture are so hellbent on allowing women sexual liberation by any means necessary, why is it that we prohibit them from working in clean, regulated, and safe brothels that would contribute income to the public coffers, lower rates of crime and disease for both the working girls and their clients, and a healthy outlet for the sexual desires of men whom, for various reasons, are unable to obtain satisfaction from the women in their lives?
Where is the Male sexual revolution? No matter how much I read about those damnable men allegedly seducing all manner of naive and innocent young women, from the facts I've gathered, which are in listed in nauseating detail on this blog, from marriage, to divorce, to child custody, and Child Support debt slavery; in every way that truly matters, it seems that Men are punished in a multitude of ways that women are not, if they are careless (or even if they are cautious) in their love affairs. It seems men in the West are getting the short end of the stick every which way.
Indeed, as we are not allowed to take our pleasure for its own sake without a host of conventions, customs, rules, consequences and burdens.
It makes no sense to confine prostitution to the street corner or the anonymous hotel room, which only increases the probability of crime and disease for all parties involved.
It makes no sense for a man in our legal climate to marry, and it's also pretty hazardous, thanks to discriminatory legislation such as VAWA, to shack up with today's modern woman. Indeed, many individuals, feminists and otherwise, have made it perfectly clear that men are dangerous dullards that should take women seriously when they loudly proclaim they need men like fish need bicycles.
And thanks to the marriage and mating strike, its become obvious to even the casual observer that more and more men are heeding that advice. In many cases, it's in a man's best interest to maintain as little contact with women, on and off the job, as possible.
So why is it then that men are forced, due to the lack of legal and safe alternatives, to "harass" this same pool of women just to have their very real physical needs met?
While I understand that excessive indulgence in sex is ruinous for society, and that marriage and family are very important and the building block of a nation, and that celibacy and sex transmutation have their important places, I also recognize the fact that little to no indulgence in intercourse is just as ruinous.
If we are going to live in a society where the sexes are encouraged to go their separate ways, then it would be in everyone's best interests for the sexual needs of both men and women to be satisfied in a safe, economically beneficial manner, in addition to the basic overall premise that legal age adults have the right to make consensual contracts for sexual fulfillment. The blunt truth is that there are plenty of women willing to supply the service if their conditions are met... only social conventions (and ironically, a great deal of feminist criticism) and legal prohibitions deter many of them from entering into the business.
(A brief aside... contrary to popular belief, there are women in the world who love to have sex for its own sake, and would be happy as a clam to provide a multitude of services to men on a professional level and support themselves in the process. Believe me... I've met them. And yes ladies, there are "establishments" just for you, that cater to women only. In Asia, they are known as Host Clubs. Toku does believe in true equality between the sexes. Handle your business.)
In summary,
Prostitution should be legalized because it would be of great benefit to Men, single, divorced, or married. Being able to visit a legal, clean, inviting, and safe Bordello would do much to demolish the current prevailing standard in the US of A that "Real Men" have to either:
A) Put themselves in legal and financial jeopardy by marrying or living with today's Western woman simply to have a normal sexual relationship, unless or until she simply stops upholding her end of the arrangement. And since American men are legally barred from taking extra wives, they either have to become an eunuch, or engage in some sort of scandalous affair that, more often than not, places himself in a worse position (divorce, loss of reputation, etc).
(The wife, upon hearing of her husband's Dirty Dancing, is shocked... absolutely shocked that her husband would dare forage for Hott Sexx from some other gal... never mind that they haven't had "relations" since 1979... Let's gut that Cheatin' Bastard at the Divorce Hearing!!!)
B) Be forced into near celibacy because one does not want to put himself at the mercy of decidedly hostile Anti-Male laws, customs, and cultural norms. Or, put himself in legal jeopardy in the Single Guy's never ending Hunt for Hookups and Phat Coochie... guess you're damned if you do and damned if you don't.
If Prostitution were legal, regulated, and taxed, today's modern man would have an alternative to our present day system of sexual highway robbery. Maybe this is the real reason why the World's Oldest Profession is illegal?
In any event, when you come down to it, a man is going to potentially spend a lot more money, time, and anguish when he wines, dines, mates, and marries good ol' Mary Jane from around the way. But... we don't label giving Mary Jane a diamond ring in exchange for her lifelong sex services "prostitution" because...
Anyway, advanced students will want to browse the writings of the Mighty Marc Rudov to learn more about the terrifying power of the Pussy Cartel.
I don't know about you, but it's about time to...
...Legalize that shit Baby!! 'Cause Pimpin ain't easy.
P.S. If our culture was one that had an enlightened attitude about sex and sensibility, men the world over could enjoy high class service such as this article details.
In Japan, for example, prostitution isn't some dirty word that is to be avoided during polite conversation... but a work of art. Korea ain't no slouch either.
If only we in the West could become so civilized. One of these days, Men are going to wake up and start fighting for what's in our best interests for a change.
Next time on Togakure School... Polygamy and why it's good for ya!
Toku.
First Things First.
Before I express my thoughts on everyone's favorite extra-curricular activity, I'd like to briefly mention that YOUR House of Representatives voted in favor of the most useless bailout in history.
(But I'm sure you already know that by now.)
This bill will do nothing to solve our crisis, and indeed, it is nothing more than the beginning of a massive re-inflation campaign that could very well tear the economy to shreds, trigger a massive dollar crisis as foreign investors dump devalued dollars, and doom this nation to third world status.
The best and most thorough explanation I've seen since my undergraduate Money and Banking class (taught by a former member of the St. Louis Federal Reserve) of how the Fed works and how, in partnership with the U.S. Treasury, it will eventually turn the U.S. Dollar into toilet tissue can be found here.
You will come away amazed and enraged. I know I was.
Incidentally, the French are already calling for a real New World Order that will not include America at its head. And, as I've previously surmised, American led efforts such as I-VAWA and CEDAW will be allowed to die a quiet death.
I can just imagine major heads of state saying to themselves behind closed doors:
If those pussy-whipped Americans are capable of squandering the wealth and power of the most prosperous nation in the history of the world, why in the hell should we adopt their screwed up family values? Our women are just fine, thank you very much!
Here's a newsflash for the Marxist-Feminists:
On a worldwide scale; no one gives a fuck about 'chya. Nations do what they do in order to make nice nice with the current Superpower, not because they give a flying fudge about feminist family values. Declining American influence = declining feminist influence.
Case in point: The Russians, having had a heaping helping of Anti-Family Marxist propaganda, aren't trying to adopt Matriarchal Western values, for very compelling reasons.
In any event, there is no possible way that this long overdue economic correction can be avoided. Indeed, with our massive outstanding liabilities for social security, medicare, and the like, our incredible military spending, and the unceasing destruction of the most fundamental unit of economic production, the married family unit, the outcome is certain.
This attempt to keep the good times rolling will meet with failure. When and how the wheels fall off, I can only speculate. But I do know that those in Congress that voted YEA for this bill have betrayed the public trust, and all those who supported this bill should be voted out of office at the earliest opportunity!
(Politicians and Bankers team up to screw the gullible American populace).
Neither Conservative nor Liberal be.
Speaking of congress, we'll be talking about this subject at length today. I've said previously that I'm not a "conservative," and you're getting ready to find out why.
In a nutshell, I am a Classical Liberal who believes that people's private lives are none of my concern, so long as all participating parties are of legal age, consent to their lifestyles without duress or threat of violence, and don't fuck up shit for me and mine.
As a matter of fact, the main reason why I became an MRA is that feminists and power mongers passed a bunch of bullshit laws such as VAWA that threaten my liberties, in addition to slandering my honor as a man. My message to the "Do-Gooders" who brought all of this shit to fruition:
STAY THE F*&K OUTTA MY BITNESS BITCHES; AND DON'T DRAG MY GOOD NAME THROUGH THE MUD!!
In general, I support the right of religious and secular groups of various ideologies to contribute to the overall marketplace of ideas, because no one has a patent on the truth. Sometimes I can be right on one subject, but someone else might be more knowledgeable about another. I can accept that. Plus, I don't know enough about what is going on in the lives of other people to want to control their very human natures like feminists have sought to do.
However, those who would teach moral codes and the like, such as Islamic Supremacists, have no right to impose their teachings upon others.
And indeed, there is no need for moral systems to win converts by the sword, or by deception, as in the feminist/marxist case. If the belief system is in harmony with the Universal Laws that govern creation and human affairs, then people will seek out the teachings by their own accord. As it is written, people tend to be convicted by their own spirit.
For example, I support the right of two men or two women to have a private "marriage" ceremony with the group of one's choosing, make contractual obligations with one another, appoint one another as power of attorney, etc. As a matter of fact, I don't give a S&^T one way or another, because I personally don't hang in homosexual circles. Live and let live.
I don't support laws making "gay marriage" legal, nor do I support laws banning the practice.
Why? Because I personally believe that true and valid marriage, the form that societies base their civilizations upon, that involve men and women and children, are beyond the reach of government. With the exception of preventing forced marriages, or the marriages of adults to minor children, government has no role in marriage, and should stay as far away from it as possible [1][2][3].
In my perfect world, since many religious groups oppose homosexuality on principle, they would, of course retain the right to speak out against gay partnerships, and refuse to perform same-sex ceremonies; while pro-homosexual groups would continue to speak in favor of same sex unions, and gay friendly organizations would continue to "marry" gay couples.
Friendly debate, Yes. Laws supporting or banning same-sex ceremonies, No.
As highlighted above, the conflict between values is a prime example as to why our Constitutional system was designed the way it was. Our system is one that enforces the Rule of Law, and recognizes universal Natural Rights and responsibilities, and is the only way that differing groups of people can live together in peace and relative harmony. This is also the only way that equilibrium in the life of a nation can be maintained because, if the rights and responsibilities of a certain group are violated, be it because of racism, sexism, discrimination because of a certain creed, etc, then the natural reaction of the downtrodden group will be for them to organize and play the game of group politics. As time passes, individuals identify with the group instead of with the nation; and the individual group members may end up supporting a larger agenda that may in fact be against their own best interests.
This is the situation we have now in America... groups bitterly in competition for laws, policies, and programs that benefit their in-group members only, all the while corrupting and weakening the nation as a whole.
Entire classes of people, for example, Men and children, are seeing their Natural, God given rights to life, liberty, property, and the impartial adjudication of disputes trampled upon in order to give more and more rights (and less and less responsibilities) to women.
And, especially in the black American community, many are so fearful that the larger society will not protect their individual rights as people (for obvious historical reasons), that they support "leaders" that are, in reality, pushing agendas that are not in their best interests.
(Harriet Tubman)
(Frederick Douglas)
Instead of carrying on the tradition of self reliance and resistance to injustice displayed by honored ancestors such as Harriet Tubman and Frederick Douglas, many of us have the Great Society and Obamanation outlook of welfarism, underachievement, and bitter gender warfare.
When I say underachievement, I mean this: why are these leaders only offering incentives to make less than a certain income, when black Americans have the potential within themselves to earn as many dollars as they desire?
I don't know about you, but a salary of $250,000 a year is a pittance. I know that I can achieve greater financial success than this. Where are the leaders encouraging us to aim for the stars?
Why is it that black Americans are discouraged from forming the most effective family arrangement known to mankind? Why is it that the single mother family is the predominate arrangement for raising children, when our African ancestors and contemporaries treasure the institution of marriage (monogamous and polygamous) ?
You see, it makes no sense. And yet, it is because of group politics that many are fearful to examine these obvious contradictions, and act to correct them. It's hard to straighten up and fly right when the Great Ark of the Group has already capsized.
Membership in the group is simply too valuable to lose, even if the tribe is sinking in the cold, dark waters of the North Atlantic, just like the Titanic.
This state of affairs is completely unsustainable in the long run, for a host of reasons discussed at length on this blog, and is completely at odds with our traditions of Constitutional Republicanism.
Human beings deserve and should expect equal rights and responsibilities; not SPECIAL rights and waived responsibilities. This is against the Universal Law, and those that violate the Law are always punished.
Anything less than this standard of Equal rights and responsibilities is unjust, tyrannical, and must be challenged, opposed, and defeated, lest the malignant cancer of favoritism spread and kill the body politic.
Forgive me for digressing, but please keep these ideals in mind as I continue with this post.
A Woman's Work.
While surfing the web for interesting material to write about, I found this article entitled, Women's Work:
Prostitution, some say, is the oldest profession in the world.
Having existed in nearly every culture, every continent and every century for which we have a historical understanding, women who perform sex acts in exchange for money have alternately endured scorn, stigma, intolerance and indifference, while being almost universally viewed as having “fallen” from decent society.
Here in America, our legal and moral responses to “the great social evil” have remained relatively unchanged for more than a hundred years, and these fallen women have remained on the margins of nearly every community.
At the beginning of the 21st century, however a combination of sexual liberty and modern technology is democratizing prostitution without waiting for it to be decriminalized...
Ahh... good ol' Prostitution. Is it a social evil?
Some people would answer in the affirmative without hesitation. I take a different view.
My position is simple: Prostitution should be legalized, regulated, and taxed, like any other occupation. Women who are over the legal age of consent, who are free of sexually transmitted diseases, and who are not being forced into sex work, have every right to enter this profession if they so choose.
For those who wish to learn more about sex-work, pornography, and prostitution from someone actively involved in the business, you might want to stop by and check out my good friend Renegade Evolution's SWOP-East Blog.
My commentary will focus on why prostitution should be legal and commercially available to Men, from a Men's Rights perspective.
Our author writes:
Go to any large American city, or any number of small ones. Find the poorest of neighborhoods. The one where drugs are easy to come by and gun violence is impossible to get rid of. Look for women who appear to have few, if any, options. Odds are you can get a blowjob for just a bit more than you can a Big Mac.
But if you want to ensure a successful night, you might consult a local Web site before you go:
“Cruised both East and West 10th Street this afternoon and saw a couple very heavy BSW [black streetwalkers] on the Eastside but nothing worth picking up. Think the heat was a little high for them today.”
“Was out early Thursday morning 1-3 a.m. Picked up a WSW [white streetwalker]. Jenny, blonde, looked to have a nice body, in her 20s, pretty girl, OK [oral sex] skills.”
“Sunday 6:30ish I saw a tall, slim blonde standing on East Washington. Not sure what intersection but it was a few blocks west of Euclid. I made a second pass and this girl was pretty cute. Almost too good to be true...”
... You don’t have to know about the Web site to know where to find streetwalkers in Indianapolis, but it certainly helps. At least that’s what one local cabdriver named Mike believes. He frequently procures the services of prostitutes and he is one of the most frequent posters on the site.
Thirty-two, divorced and the father of three boys under 11, Mike drives a cab at night and works at a restaurant during the day. He’s been posting on the site since he found out about it from another cab driver two years ago. Even though he’s rather non-committal about whether or not prostitution should be a crime, he’s adamant that the social networking aspect of the Web site is a good thing...
The writer also notes:
... Like Mike the cab driver, Jerry is another Indianapolis man who uses a local Web site to post reports of his successes and failures in his business dealings with escorts.
“I’m very careful,” he says over lunch in Broad Ripple. “I’m clean, and I expect the women I deal with to be clean also. I’m not just looking for sex. I’m looking — and willing to pay for — an experience.”
In his mid-40s, Jerry is divorced and the father of two teenagers. He owns his business, one that affords him the luxury of spending quite a few hours and hundreds of dollars for the company of women each month.
“I’m happy being single,” he says. “I’ve got my business, my kids and a good relationship with my ex-wife. I have no interest in having a girlfriend, or being in a serious relationship right now. But that doesn’t mean I don’t want to have sex.
“Look, I’ve tried being honest with women I’ve dated,” he says when asked why he chooses to pay for sex rather than just date like most single adults. “I tell them I don’t want a relationship; they say they understand; a couple weeks or months go by and pretty soon they want more. And I don’t want to give them more.
“This way,” he says, “nobody gets hurt...”
The journalist, telling us about Prostitution in Amsterdam, remarks:
... The Dutch government runs a pretty tight ship where prostitution is concerned; it is a $1 billion industry for the country and accounts for 5 percent of the GDP. Presumably, these women are all legal residents, they are all of consent age, they are all licensed and regularly provided medical exams, which they must pass in order to remain in business.
These women are all here by choice. They are all consenting adults. And they earn their living thanks in no small part to American men, from the hordes of frat boys who trip through the streets each summer, to men like an Indianapolis financier named David who recently confided in me that he frequently travels to Amsterdam for “sex vacations.”
Nearing 60, married for nearly 30 years and otherwise completely faithful to his wife and mother of his children, David has been coming to Amsterdam to legally have sex with prostitutes off and on for nearly two decades.
“It started by accident,” he tells me in a conspiratorial whisper. “I have a client with offices in Amsterdam, and I started traveling there about once a year on business; now, I just build in an extra few days for non-work activities.
"My only goal is to have sex with all the women I want to,” he offers as a vacation itinerary. “Sometimes it’s only three or four; once it was more than 10. Last time, I was there for only two days and found one girl to spend both of them with. Cost me $5,000, but it was worth every dime.”
At the end of his confession, David explains that he wouldn’t risk paying for a prostitute in the United States. And that he believes it should be legal. To punctuate his point, he quotes George Carlin: “I don’t understand why prostitution is illegal. Selling is legal, fucking is legal. So why isn’t it legal to sell fucking?...”
When you have a moment, check out the entire article.
So you might be asking, what's your point here?
Lemme break it down.
Men who visit prostitutes, especially in the English speaking countries, tend to be looked down upon by polite society. Shaming language such as, "losers", "abusers", "weirdos", "perverts", and other grade school insults are commonplace. Men who decide to bypass today's modern feminist woman and pay prostitutes for sex are urged to "step up their game" and "find a real woman to date", among other retarded advice.
However, the article above tells us that normal men, who have found "real women" to mate with and marry, prefer, for various personal reasons, to pay for sex. These men could be family members, co-workers, friends or acquaintances. And most of the men featured have found out too late that getting married in the West isn't a "death to us part" proposition. Maybe they've figured out by now that life, love, and marriage aren't as simplistic as it's made out to be.
The way I see it, the hysteria surrounding this most intimate of transactions is another example of society brainwashing a man from fulfilling one of his most deep-seated desires at his discretion.
What women (and a good many Manginas) fail to understand is that the vast majority of men are hardwired to be lean, mean, sex machines; so much so that many women aren't in a position to keep up.
Men are not women; we are fundamentally different. And when it comes to love and sex, we process these impulses using quite different operating systems.
(Dr. Louann Brizendine)
Dr. Louann Brizendine informs us in her magnificent book, The Female Brain (highly recommended):
The Great Sexual Divide
"The sex-related centers in the male brain are actually about two times larger than parallel structures in the female brain. When it comes to the brain, size does make a difference in the way women and men think about, respond to, and experience sex.
Men, quite literally, have sex on their minds more than women do. They feel pressure in their gonads and prostates unless they ejaculate frequently. Males have double the brain space and processing power devoted to sex as females. Just as women have an eight-lane superhighway for processing emotion while men have a country road, men have O'Hare Airport as a hub for processing thoughts about sex whereas women have the airfield nearby that lands small and private planes... Male brain systems for sex are on alert with every waft of perfume and every female that walks (pp 91-92)."
(Compare O'Hare International Airport...)
(... to Greenwood Municipal Airport. Any Questions?)
Dr. Brizendine explains how a woman's sex drive can be easily shut down by other activities, such as caring for an infant:
"Often mother love and breast feeding replace or interfere with a new mother's desire for her partner...
... like all women who are in skin to skin contact with babies and breast feeding- has a brain that marinating in oxytocin and dopamine making her feel loved, deeply bonded, and physically and emotionally satisfied. It's no wonder that she has no need for sexual contact. Many of the positive feelings she usually gets from sexual intercourse are evoked, several times daily, by meeting the basic physical needs of her young children (p. 106-107)."
This last paragraph brings to mind a universally recognized truth for many married couples... the sex stops, or moves to a crawl, once children enter the picture.
Let's take a look at a few examples.
(What she's really thinking...)
From Momlogic.com:
10 Tricks for Moms to Avoid Sex
Monday, October 6, 2008
Forget the cliche "Not tonight honey, I have a headache" excuse for getting out of doing the deed.
Like it or not, when you have kids, sex often takes a back seat to other items on our "to do" lists. When it comes down to it, given the option of "getting it on" or house cleaning (so we're not forced to outfit the family in protective Hazmat suits) -- we choose the latter. Heck, we only have a limited amount of time, something's gotta give.
Often, we moms end up going through the motions. Recently our post "What Moms Think About During Sex" made it clear just how tired and distracted many of us can be while fulfilling our "wifely duties." How do we get into that (missionary) position in the first place? Tired old avoidance ploys like "Not tonight honey, I have a headache," simply don't work anymore -- especially with the invention of Advil.
Here are some handy ways to get out of "doing it" -- if you just can't fit sex into your schedule...
From The Standard:
Published on 06/10/2008
Differences in sexual appetite may be driven by evolution.
A woman’s sex drive begins to plummet once she is in a secure relationship, according to research. Researchers from Germany found that four years into a relationship, less than half of 30-year-old women wanted regular sex. Conversely, the team found a man’s libido remained the same regardless of how long he had been in a relationship.
Writing in the journal Human Nature, the scientists said the differences resulted from how humans had evolved. For men, a good reason their sexual motivation remained constant was to guard against being cuckolded by another male.
The researchers from Hamburg-Eppendorf University Hospital interviewed 530 men and women about their relationships. They found 60 per cent of 30-year-old women wanted sex "often" at the beginning of a relationship, but within four years of the relationship this figure fell to under 50 per cent, and after 20 years it dropped to about 20 per cent. In contrast, they found the proportion of men wanting regular sex remained at between 60-80 per cent, regardless of how long they had been in a relationship...
From Divorce Busting:
Sex Drives: His and Hers
By Michele Weiner-Davis
Hi Michele,
I'd like to ask your advice about sex. My husband and I have very different sex drives. For him, everyday would be great, and twice a day would be greater. For me, once a week, but to accommodate him, I'd have sex twice a week. I don't think I'm abnormal, but he asks, "What's wrong with you?" I say it's normal for a couple to have sex once or twice a week. He says he doesn't care about 'normal', it's not enough for him. He has a point, but everyday and even every other day is too much for me. We've been married almost 20 years and have both built up a lot of resentment towards each other. He, because of the sex, and me, for a whole lot of other marital problems. I never did have a high sex drive, even before we were married. Neither of us know how to solve this problem, but it's a big one.
Kathy
Dear Kathy,
I am very glad that you are asking for feedback about your sexual relationship with your husband because the patterns in your marriage are so common that others reading your letter and my response might benefit greatly.
First of all, know that testosterone, one of the hormones responsible for sex drive, is 20-40% higher in men than women. Though it is not always the case, it is very common for men to desire sex more often than their wives. This gender difference often creates problems in marriages, particularly when people blame each other for being different. Men think their wives are passionless and women think their husbands are sex maniacs. (I write about this in Getting Through to the Man You Love). Blame is the thing that destroys marriages, not differences in libido.
When men and women have substantially different sex drives, something interesting happens. Most women need to feel close to their partners emotionally to desire sex. Women need to spend time with their partners, to communicate on a deep level and feel like they're team mates in regards to housework and kids and so on. All this has to be in place for most women to really desire their men.
Men, on the other hand, generally need to feel close to their partners physically before they invest a great deal of energy into their relationships. So she's waiting for him to be more intimate emotionally and he's waiting for her to be more tuned into him physically and the resentment that results in this waiting game is so huge, it's beyond belief.
That being said, it's really important for both of you to become more understanding of each other. This means you both need to try to imagine what it would be like to live in each others shoes for a while. He probably walks around feeling that if you loved him more, you would be more sensitive to his needs. He undoubtedly feels hurt and rejected and might even question his sex appeal...
There are countless articles, studies, and reports that prove that the average Man desires sex a lot more than the average woman.
And in light of the overwhelming evidence, I will boldly state that the current social arrangement; that men are supposed to grow up, marry only one woman, and confine his sexual activity to that one woman only for the rest of his natural life is not the best lifestyle fit for every man on the planet, and to expect all men to conform to this one size fits all ideal is a recipe for frustration and failure.
Some men are perfectly happy living a totally monogamous lifestyle, and there is nothing wrong with that. However in real life, many men will not be able (or willing) to meet such a standard. And from a historical perspective, when we consider that Prostitution, Concubinage, and Polygamous marriage has been much more common and widespread than our American monogamous model, we come to the conclusion that our current social model is both limited in scope and shortsighted in its understanding of the nature of the Male Sex.
Also when one considers that a married woman is no longer obligated to perform her basic carnal duties, and that if a husband complains about a lack of loving, he is committing an offense akin to marital rape or some other alleged form of "violence," the present state of affairs is completely absurd.
In addition, the fact that prostitution, a traditional outlet of sexual frustration for Men in Western culture [1][2], is illegal doesn't help matters, and the overall expectation of 100% fidelity at all times and in all situations greatly discourages today's modern man from marriage:
A) Why marry if you can get all the Poontang you can get if you remain single?
B) If you get married and sexual peccadilloes occur, are you prepared to lose your property, children, family, livelihood, or even your life?
Now I know some of you might think that I am placing undue emphasis on Sex, as if there are no other considerations such as honoring one's vows, the exercise of self discipline and self control, religious or spiritual principles, among other things.
Indeed, there are many valid arguments as to why sexual restraint is necessary.
As an example of why the male sex drive would need to be subliminated, author Muata Ashby, in his book Sacred Sexuality: Ancient Egyptian Tantric Yoga, explains that:
"... the true identity of a human being is not sexual, not the body, mind, senses or anything which is in the realm of time and space because the realm of time and space is the realm of duality and illusion (p. 101)..."
The author also notes that, on a physical level:
"Through celibacy, right action and spiritual study, a deeper feeling can be discovered wherein the very source of one's true being can manifest. This is why the ancient spiritual texts of all faiths exhort all followers to keep chaste and devoted to the Divine... The practice of celibacy allows spiritual energy to flow into an elevated process of mental development rather than the degraded thoughts of lust which rob the mind of its peace, contentment and inner creative ability (p. 154)...
... It must be clearly understood that the purpose of sexuality is procreation and not recreation. It is a sacred act to engender life and is not designed for the purpose of daily, weekly, or yearly practice... Anyone who does not control the sexual urge cannot expect to evolve spiritually since the sexual activity itself disrupts the hormones of the body and the mind's ability to see clearly... it drains the physical and mental energy of the person (p. 171)."
(Napoleon Hill)
Noted writer and success coach Napoleon Hill, in his masterwork of Think and Grow Rich, tells us that:
"The human mind responds to stimulation!
Among the greatest and most powerful of... stimuli is the urge of sex. When harnessed and transmuted, this driving force is capable of lifting people into that higher sphere of thought (genius level) that enables them to master the sources of worry and petty annoyance that beset their pathway on the lower plane (p. 153)."
Mr. Hill also notes that most people do not succeed before the age of Forty because:
"...study disclosed that the major reason why the majority of people who succeed do not begin to do so before the age of forty to fifty is their tendency to dissipate their energies through overindulgence in physical expression of the emotion of sex. Most people never learn that sex has other possibilities, which far transcend in importance that of mere physical expression. The majority of those who make this discovery do so after having wasted many years when the sex energy is at its height, prior to the age of forty five to fifty. This is usually followed by noteworthy achievement (p. 154)."
(J.A. Rogers)
Author J.A. Rogers, in his classic work Sex and Race volume 3 writes:
"The intellectual, the artist, and the business man all have a tendency to shun the material woman and her simpler, often nagging ways, for the fast woman-the type with the cocktail glass, the cigarette and the abundant display of well-stockinged legs, the kind that shuns maternity. "The attraction towards prostitutes," says Bloch, "is one of the most remarkable phenomena in the psyche of modern civilized man; it is the curse of the evolution of civilization..."
(A Greek Hetaira)
(Love in India)
... "The preference of the cultured Greeks, Hindus, and Romans for the company of the hetaira, or intellectual prostitute, is well known. Rome, Greece, Corinth, Ephesus, ended their days in a glorious outburst of licentiousness (p. 191)..."
Mr. Joseph Unwin, author of Sex and Culture, bases his entire work on the premise that civilization makes its ascent when the sex drive is channeled into constructive activity and remains highly regulated; and that societies fall when sexual mores loosen, leading to a irresistable landslide of corruption and collapse.
With all that said, I recognize and respect the power of sex. It is the force that engenders life, and reckless handling of this awesome power can bring death, decay, and destruction. A society as sexually promiscuous as ours seems to have thrown caution to the wind, and has turned the Western world into Fuckfest 2008, possibly signifying the end of the Age of Western Dominance.
Ironically, our society only allows near absolute freedom of sexual expression within certain parameters that does nothing to contribute to social stability and long term sustainability, and goes a long way towards undermining it.
If we as a culture are so hellbent on allowing women sexual liberation by any means necessary, why is it that we prohibit them from working in clean, regulated, and safe brothels that would contribute income to the public coffers, lower rates of crime and disease for both the working girls and their clients, and a healthy outlet for the sexual desires of men whom, for various reasons, are unable to obtain satisfaction from the women in their lives?
Where is the Male sexual revolution? No matter how much I read about those damnable men allegedly seducing all manner of naive and innocent young women, from the facts I've gathered, which are in listed in nauseating detail on this blog, from marriage, to divorce, to child custody, and Child Support debt slavery; in every way that truly matters, it seems that Men are punished in a multitude of ways that women are not, if they are careless (or even if they are cautious) in their love affairs. It seems men in the West are getting the short end of the stick every which way.
Indeed, as we are not allowed to take our pleasure for its own sake without a host of conventions, customs, rules, consequences and burdens.
It makes no sense to confine prostitution to the street corner or the anonymous hotel room, which only increases the probability of crime and disease for all parties involved.
It makes no sense for a man in our legal climate to marry, and it's also pretty hazardous, thanks to discriminatory legislation such as VAWA, to shack up with today's modern woman. Indeed, many individuals, feminists and otherwise, have made it perfectly clear that men are dangerous dullards that should take women seriously when they loudly proclaim they need men like fish need bicycles.
And thanks to the marriage and mating strike, its become obvious to even the casual observer that more and more men are heeding that advice. In many cases, it's in a man's best interest to maintain as little contact with women, on and off the job, as possible.
So why is it then that men are forced, due to the lack of legal and safe alternatives, to "harass" this same pool of women just to have their very real physical needs met?
While I understand that excessive indulgence in sex is ruinous for society, and that marriage and family are very important and the building block of a nation, and that celibacy and sex transmutation have their important places, I also recognize the fact that little to no indulgence in intercourse is just as ruinous.
If we are going to live in a society where the sexes are encouraged to go their separate ways, then it would be in everyone's best interests for the sexual needs of both men and women to be satisfied in a safe, economically beneficial manner, in addition to the basic overall premise that legal age adults have the right to make consensual contracts for sexual fulfillment. The blunt truth is that there are plenty of women willing to supply the service if their conditions are met... only social conventions (and ironically, a great deal of feminist criticism) and legal prohibitions deter many of them from entering into the business.
(A brief aside... contrary to popular belief, there are women in the world who love to have sex for its own sake, and would be happy as a clam to provide a multitude of services to men on a professional level and support themselves in the process. Believe me... I've met them. And yes ladies, there are "establishments" just for you, that cater to women only. In Asia, they are known as Host Clubs. Toku does believe in true equality between the sexes. Handle your business.)
In summary,
Prostitution should be legalized because it would be of great benefit to Men, single, divorced, or married. Being able to visit a legal, clean, inviting, and safe Bordello would do much to demolish the current prevailing standard in the US of A that "Real Men" have to either:
A) Put themselves in legal and financial jeopardy by marrying or living with today's Western woman simply to have a normal sexual relationship, unless or until she simply stops upholding her end of the arrangement. And since American men are legally barred from taking extra wives, they either have to become an eunuch, or engage in some sort of scandalous affair that, more often than not, places himself in a worse position (divorce, loss of reputation, etc).
(The wife, upon hearing of her husband's Dirty Dancing, is shocked... absolutely shocked that her husband would dare forage for Hott Sexx from some other gal... never mind that they haven't had "relations" since 1979... Let's gut that Cheatin' Bastard at the Divorce Hearing!!!)
B) Be forced into near celibacy because one does not want to put himself at the mercy of decidedly hostile Anti-Male laws, customs, and cultural norms. Or, put himself in legal jeopardy in the Single Guy's never ending Hunt for Hookups and Phat Coochie... guess you're damned if you do and damned if you don't.
If Prostitution were legal, regulated, and taxed, today's modern man would have an alternative to our present day system of sexual highway robbery. Maybe this is the real reason why the World's Oldest Profession is illegal?
In any event, when you come down to it, a man is going to potentially spend a lot more money, time, and anguish when he wines, dines, mates, and marries good ol' Mary Jane from around the way. But... we don't label giving Mary Jane a diamond ring in exchange for her lifelong sex services "prostitution" because...
Anyway, advanced students will want to browse the writings of the Mighty Marc Rudov to learn more about the terrifying power of the Pussy Cartel.
I don't know about you, but it's about time to...
...Legalize that shit Baby!! 'Cause Pimpin ain't easy.
P.S. If our culture was one that had an enlightened attitude about sex and sensibility, men the world over could enjoy high class service such as this article details.
In Japan, for example, prostitution isn't some dirty word that is to be avoided during polite conversation... but a work of art. Korea ain't no slouch either.
If only we in the West could become so civilized. One of these days, Men are going to wake up and start fighting for what's in our best interests for a change.
Next time on Togakure School... Polygamy and why it's good for ya!
Toku.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/silver/t24_ag_en_usoz_2.gif)
![[Most Recent Exchange Rate from www.kitco.com]](http://www.weblinks247.com/exrate/24hr-jpy-small.gif)
